Would you agree with voluntary funding for government assistance programs?

Question

Would you agree with changing the funding for government assistance programs by making it voluntary to fund them?

On you income tax return, there will be a box you can check to decide how much of your income you want to contribute toward funding government assistance programs. The box would look like this:

What portion of your AGI would you like to contribute toward funding government programs to help the needy?
a. Zero (0%)
b. One tenth (10%)
c. One quarter (25%)
d. Your fair share (40%)
e. One half (50%)
f. Other (fill in a percentage):_____%


Government assistance programs would be funded only by money that was contributed voluntarily. Applicants would be ranked according to their level of need, and only the neediest applicants will qualify for assistance until the available funding is depleted.

Would you agree with this?

Answer 1

No, and here's why..



Charity is best administered in the private sector through voluntary donations to private charities. Those 'local' charities can best identify who is genuinely in need of help (a hand up) and not a useless, good for nothing, lazy moocher (a hand out).



As with anything the federal grubberment sticks its nose in, they just have a 'one size fits all' approach that not only supports, but encourages a womb to tomb useless moocher lifestyle (be it welfare recipients or grubberment workers- NEITHER of which produce anything of value)

Answer 2

I like the idea. I'd actually like to have all our taxes that way. Not voluntary, but we get to select where our tax dollars go.



So maybe I want:



20% for defense.

15% for transportation

15% for education

20% for military vets

15% for welfare programs

5% for environment/parks

10% for general fund (which they can use for whatever, or to cover any shortages).



Maybe you want 50% military, 30% transportation, and 20% health care. Maybe another person doesn't care, so all their money goes to the general fund. Maybe someone else wants to give equally to each department, but doesn't want any of their tax dollars to support the military. This way, spending reflects our values as a nation.

Answer 3

She is the in elementary words candidate up to now that has proposed an monetary plan. business enterprise and wall st like her because she is customary and he or she has been in the back of extremely some the sensible monetary strikes that bill Clinton did besides the very undeniable actuality that some human beings do not prefer to hearken to that. the wide previous Bush deficit growing a important surplus probable the biggest reversal in this usa's heritage. She has many of the knowledgeable and modern advisers of the former administration plus many extra years of journey than in the previous. actual it may in elementary words bypass up from the following. Plus as you comprehend the president is purely no longer operating the country otherwise what do you imagine might want to have occurred the perfect 7 years if Bush changed into extremely in value of each and every thing! i might want to assert enable's provide our woman a probability. :)

Answer 4

Only if I can voluntarily fund the military. No one asked me if I wanted to fund that obscenity known as the Iraq war. Therefor have no interest in hearing complaints from the right about our funding of programs to help our fellow Americans here at home. What we spent on the Iraq war could fund the SNAP (Food Stamps) program for 20 years.

Answer 5

It would never work, all of those caring and concerned liberals would be wallowing in their cash as people starved in the streets and as crime sky rocketed due to single mothers trying to find the money to feed their children and the baby daddy looking for his next gin and juice and sack of weed.



It how ever would be a good way to force the government to address the fraud and abuse issues in most "social" programs.

Answer 6

It is the duty of each individual to minimize taxes paid, consistent with the law.



It is the duty of each individual to choose representatives who will make wise choices about the tax laws and the expenditure of government resources.



It is the duty of each individual to abide by the laws, not to seditiously undermine those aspects of tax law and government with which he disagrees.

Answer 7

No I would not. The only reason I would not is because the government can NOT be trusted to spend our money. They prove that over and over. I do give to the poor on a regular basis, however.

Answer 8

That is not government, it is charity. If you think we should fund assistance programs that way, how about throwing in the military too?

Answer 9

Yes. This would force the greedy government to prioritize and manage taxes better.

Answer 10

No, I also would not with the voluntary paying of taxes.

Answer 11

No, sounds fishy

Answer 12

NO!!