Question:
Why doesn't the MSM show us all the numbers on Obamacare?
GEORGE B
2013-09-28 10:39:53 UTC
Let's have a look at some charts and numbers and opinions for the cost of Obamacare.

Insurance premiums before Obamacare and after Obamacare:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BVN8C2HCEAEQxKK.jpg:large

Biggest growth sector caused by Obamacare will be government:
http://d1ovi2g6vebctw.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/oact-nhe-2011-1024x610.jpg

If not changed this will eventually consume 100% of your income..... by government edict and confiscation:
http://static5.businessinsider.com/~~/f?id=4a6e1028ac3ec54a4899d702

Estimated higher rates due to Obamacare:
http://coverusa.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Screen-shot-2013-08-29-at-8.37.42-AM.png

For younger citizens Obamacare will become more and more expensive as time passes:
http://www.investors.com/image/FPart_130805.png.cms

Why do people stay on welfare? Because government makes it more financially attractive to stay on welfare than to be employed:
http://danieljmitchell.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/welfare-trap.jpg

Evolution of Obamacare:
http://danieljmitchell.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/obamacare-cartoon-5.jpg?w=500

Obamacare sinkhole:
http://danieljmitchell.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/obamacare-cartoon-6.jpg?w=500

Baby Obamacare:
http://danieljmitchell.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/obamacare-cartoon-3.jpg?w=500

Bend Over America:
http://www.maggiesnotebook.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Cartoon_Obama_D-Gator_25.jpg
Eleven answers:
?
2013-09-28 10:48:39 UTC
If that is the case, why are the Obamacare rates 15% less than even what the government expected? There are rates that are under $100 a month. Many states are reporting reduction of premiums of over 50% over what they were before ObamaCare. Even before it is fully implemented, ObamaCare is lowering the yearly inflation of medical costs to 4% versus double digits previously. You also forget that ObamaCare is FULLY FUNDED, has no effect on the budget, and has actually helped reduce the deficit.

.

As far as welfare with benefits, your own chart shows that the government benefits taper off instead of a cliff as you state. The average welfare receipient is a single mother with at least one child and most of them are off welfare within a year. z

.

@Westward Wind: Wendy Davis successfully filibustered on abortion and did not talk about anything other than abortion. The Texass legislature was forced to adjorn due to a time limit that was set. Ted Cruz was given a set time and barely talked about the continuing resolution (the bill that was being considered). And he did not answer the question that America wants to know: "If you get sick of green eggs and ham, would it be covered by ObamaCare?" BTW, the answer is yes.
titania_woodland_fairy_queen
2013-09-28 11:00:00 UTC
There are charts all you have to do is look.



Do you even see the hypocrisy in talking about how mainstream media doesn't tell us something then you post crap from alternative media that says nothing and contains no actual facts.



None of your linked "sources" charts show actual numbers, demographics, years, or anything else of reference they are worthless.
marvinsussman@sbcglobal.net
2013-09-28 13:31:19 UTC
Q1: Does the US taxpayer have a real “national debt”?

A1: No, our “national debt” is a cruel hoax lacking all three of the essential qualities of a real debt.



1. A real debt must be repaid. The “national debt” has never been repaid and will never be repaid.



Yes, Treasuries are redeemed at maturity, but the “national debt” is the total value of outstanding Treasuries (TVOT). In our history, we have rarely had even a modest annual budget surplus. No serious politician today has any plan whatsoever for a budget surplus. The TVOT must grow with the economy. An economy without an adequate supply of risk-free interest-bearing Treasuries is unthinkable!



We leave our grandchildren not debts but assets: infrastructure! Schools, environment, and an energy supply. We must fully employ our unemployed resources as did Lincoln (railways, telegraph, land-grant colleges), “Teddy” Roosevelt (National Parks, Panama Canal), and FDR (TVA, PWA, WPA, CCC, etc.).



2. A real debt must be a significant burden. The “national debt” is not a significant burden on taxpayers.



The Treasury redeems securities by selling securities, which it creates with a few keystrokes. If needed, the Fed can create an artificial shortage by buying securities on the open market with a few keystrokes.



The Treasury auctions bonds only because Congress requires that the proceeds cover the annual budget deficit. This requirement was suspended during World War II (during which the Fed bought Treasuries) (http://neweconomicperspectives.org/2013/08/mobilization-and-money.html#more-6200) followed by 35 years of strong economic growth without harmful inflation. Thus, “borrowing” to cover the deficit, a relic of the former gold standard regime, was and remains absolutely unnecessary for a prosperous economy.



Under our fiat currency and floating foreign exchange rate regime, which we have had since 1971, budget deficits can again be financed only by keystrokes while balancing full employment against inflation.



Inflation? Deficit spending NEVER causes inflation during a recession. During prosperity, bank lending ALWAYS causes inflation, creating over $30 of credit for every deficit dollar spent. Regulate the banks!



3. A real debt bears a significant interest. The “national debt” bears no significant interest for taxpayers.



Yes, the bond-holders receive interest payments, but the Treasury pays the interest by simply auctioning more bonds, which it creates with a few keystrokes. The bond-buyers pay the interest! Economists recognize this by declaring that our “primary” annual budget deficit does not include debt interest payments because they never consume physical resources and have no economic effect.



Q2. Could people stop buying Treasuries?

A2. Yes, when people no longer want insurance, annuities, pensions, 401(k)s, or other investments.



Q3: Could investors make a run on Treasuries?

A3: Yes, when investors can get risk-free returns from the Wall Street casino or corporate, state, and municipal bonds. Safety is not everything. Safety is the ONLY thing!



Q4: Could investors prefer foreign sovereign bonds?

A4: Yes, indeed! So far, over 60% of the world’s reserve currencies are in dollars and half of all US Treasury bonds are held by foreigners. But that could change if China’s sovereign bonds become safer than ours. And that could happen only if China’s infrastructure (and so its productivity) becomes better than ours. And that could happen only if US voters worry more about our “national debt” / TVOT than they worry about China’s fast-growing infrastructure and our falling bridges and bursting sewers.



Q5: Won’t we need higher tax rates to pay for infrastructure?

A5: Our money tree does not need our taxes for spending. Congress first creates money and spends it. Then, only to avoid inflation, the IRS repossesses and destroys almost all the money. (Cash payments are shredded!) Think about it: where and how did the first tax payer get money for the first tax payment?



Every federal dollar that is spent and not repossessed by the IRS is saved by the private sector. Our annual budget deficit is exactly equal to the annual private sector savings increase. Yes, DEFICITS = SAVINGS! No deficits, no savings! Our so-called “national debt” is really our Total Private Sector Savings (TPSS). The scary “Debt Clock” is really the “Savings Clock”! The “national debt” scare is a corrupt fraud!



Since bank loans must be repaid with interest, budget deficits are the ONLY source of private sector savings. We need to DOUBLE our “national debt” / TVOT / TPPS / Investment to guarantee prosperity! Our ratio of “national debt” plus total bank deposits to GDP is less than half of the comparable figure for China. Our M2 (money supply) / GDP ratio is half of Switzerland’s ratio and one quarter of Hongkong’s.
dakotaviper
2013-09-28 11:27:31 UTC
Because Liberals know that it is easier to believe a lie than the truth.
2013-09-28 12:19:56 UTC
http://kaiserfamilyfoundation.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/early-look-at-premiums-and-participation-in-marketplaces.pdf?vm=r the corporate media does not focus on this.
Edward
2013-09-28 10:42:35 UTC
http://www.fool.com/retirement/general/2013/07/07/obamacare-explained-what-it-means-for-those-who-al.aspx
2013-09-28 10:42:32 UTC
Two reasons.

It would take over 10,000 pages to get the report made.

The liberals don't want people to find out what is in it until it is too late.
2013-09-28 14:42:12 UTC
All people have to do is look.



liberty-minded.blogspot.com
2013-09-28 10:40:30 UTC
All those things would have increased without ObamaCare.
Rondi
2013-09-28 10:41:37 UTC
because the MSM is in love with Obama and supports him one hundred percent, they don't stop to think how this will hurt the country because to them Obama can do no wrong.
2013-09-28 10:47:04 UTC
because if they DID nobody would support it!


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...