2010-05-08 03:35:23 UTC
excerpt...
“Individuals could be required to provide the new agency with written answers--under oath--to any question posed by the bureau regarding their personal financial information.”
Democrats saw no problem with the broad information-collecting powers in their bill. Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.) said that there “wasn’t any 4th Amendment issue” in allowing the government to collect any financial data it wants.
The 4th Amendment protects against “unreasonable searches and seizures” by the government. Reed said that the nation “desperately” needs to have the government monitoring the inner workings of the financial industry, arguing that if government couldn’t collect any information it thought it needed, regulators would be “flying in the dark.”
Sen. Bob Casey (D-Pa.) told CNSNews.com that if privacy issues arose as a result of the new collection powers, then Congress would deal with them at that time.
“I agree [with Reed]. I don’t see it,” Casey said. “If we get a bill passed, and it gets implemented and an issue arises that someone believes is an infringement on privacy, we’d certainly consider that and analyze that.”
CNSNews.com pressed Casey about exactly what activities would be prevented under the bill, pointing out that fraud is already illegal under federal law. Casey could not name any specific banking practice that the new bill would put a stop to or protect consumers from.
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/65427