Question:
The national debt is past $8,340,000,000,000 . How can Bush and the republicans get away with this?
lip11
2006-06-17 16:27:54 UTC
That's $8.34 trillion. About $28,000 for every US citizens. It increases almost $1.74 billion every day!

See http://zfacts.com/p/318.html , and many other websites highlighting what should be a crime. They are stealing our money!

And don't come back with the old " you liberals spend too". See the graph showing national debt increasing or decreasing with administrations for the last 60 years. Republicans are far more responsible for this catastrophe than democrats, who are bad enough.
24 answers:
Matthew C
2006-06-17 16:31:27 UTC
"Hey! Look at the queers over there!!" ... that's how.
MrCool1978
2006-06-17 23:50:59 UTC
The National Debt also went up under Clinton.



Besides that when ya look at all the different positions that exist in the Govt you cannot blame the President for everything but I swear considering how a lot of ignorant people are I think we should consider having a King and Prime Minister.
viking_transplant
2006-06-17 23:43:33 UTC
How can they get away with this? By diverting our attention away from the fact that our economy is being run like some 3rd world banana republic to important "moral" issues like gay marriage.



The thing that really gets me is that they sell themselves as moral leaders when the most important moral issue of our day involves reconstructing our economy such that it is sustainable for future generations.



Who gives a sh1t about gay marriage because not too far in the future we will hit peak oil (10-15 yrs), our healthcare system will collapse (costs going up 2.5X our ability to pay for them) and foreign investment will be withdrawn, plunging us into a depression?



At least the Bush and Cheney households will be provided for considering the fact that oil prices have skyrocketed since the war and Halliburton grabs outrageously inflated government contracts. They can all move to China while we clean up their mess.
blairs_smirking_revenge
2006-06-17 23:36:01 UTC
There is something overlooked by many nations and many of the citizens of America when considering their ludicrous spending, especially considering the money given to the war.



America is the last juggernaut the West has to defend itself. It has been that way since after WW2 when Europe could not afford to rebuild its military might with the reconstruction effort going on.



They spend billions of dollars on the war - borrowed from China that your grandchildren's children will be paying off - because the West is becoming complacent in its peace. Meanwhile Russia's military is losing manpower while compensating with new US technologies, and China is consistently building their military with the obvious intent of hegemony from the Ukraine to Japan.



Meanwhile, who's standing up to them with things other than diplomacy? No one. And we all know that diplomacy only works when the two partners are fully willing. Why would people who would gain from the fall of America and Europe possibly commit themselves to a diplomatic treaty if only to keep America in its place while they build their arms.



Europe is not part of Russia today because of the United States. Much of Asia is not under the control of China because of the United States.



Now, though, we only have one military power and that -one- military power is calling all the shots - even the stupid ones. There's no one to challenge America for giving arms and weapons technologies to their greatest threats.



It is time for all countries of the Western Hemisphere to build up their militaries appropriately. America is taking far too much of the burden and they are cracking under it while we enjoy the peace that will only last as long as America's military superiority.
rempuh
2006-06-18 00:02:29 UTC
When Clinton was in office, he managed to reduce the debt from 5.7 trillion to about 5.3 trillion. Then along came Bush who increased it to what it is today - close to 8.4 trillion. http://www.brillig.com/debt_clock/



The main reason for this appears to be spending on the War of Aggression on Iraq - a war that the United Nations consider to be illegal and should not have started. It is simply a war of expansion - capturing and controlling other people's land. America is not known to be "protective" of other countries. It is expansionist, unlike China.



To find out the truth about what's going on in this war, instead of the propaganda that is spread through American media, read: http://www.uruknet.info/?p=-6
normy in garden city
2006-06-17 23:43:23 UTC
Free trade agreement. It's one sided. All that money is leaving the country and it's not comming back. You aint seen nothing yet. The ripple is only starting as hundreds of businesses are going under every day. Sell imports so cheap that the American counterpart can't compete and when they go under then jack the prices back up.
se_roddy
2006-06-17 23:56:13 UTC
I think what really gets me is that the Republicans blame the Democrats for this. However Clinton was the only president in US history to ever balance the budget, and lower the deficit.
2006-06-17 23:31:25 UTC
No good bleating about it - the majority of you Americans voted for a Republican government. Now you have to wait until their term is up and do something about it. But like most countries when it comes to voting, the turn out is low and memories are short.
skifaster6
2006-06-17 23:30:16 UTC
Maybe Bill Gates should donate some of his $26 BILLION to the cause. How can one man acumulate so much wealth? Share the wealth my friend.

Don't worry, once we take over Iran and start getting a percentage of the oil sales from Iraq they will start paying it off....
obviously_you'renotagolfer
2006-06-17 23:54:18 UTC
They have a really, really good credit card.



And don't worry. With as much money as you Demo's claim he is stealing in oil money, I'm sure he'll just pay it off with some pocket money the day before he leaves office. Or maybe he and Cheney will ro-sham-bo to see who pays.
Calee
2006-06-17 23:35:15 UTC
Hopefully, it's just a matter of time, before the revolution.

But the book is out for the name of todays generation:

Generation Debt - need I say more?
sentrasersr20de
2006-06-17 23:30:40 UTC
The same way that the Democrats did when they controlled congress for 40years. Spend, spend, spend. Two wrongs dont make a right.
Emmature
2006-06-17 23:31:54 UTC
Most Americans are too oblivious to wrap their minds around the first three zeros, much less the last seven. As long as they have cheetos and reality tv they'll be happy, satisfied and apathetic.
playtoofast
2006-06-17 23:38:42 UTC
i will tell you all a secret invest in gold and silver it will soon take off like the stock market did for 20 yrs but it will jump in a matter of months as the economy colapses as the dollar is worth less and less on the world market.
2006-06-17 23:32:06 UTC
The same way they're dealing with the war. They're passing it on to the next administration (and generations).
shehawke
2006-06-17 23:30:34 UTC
If they could go after Clinton for getting a ********, why don't they impeach the shrub for this alone? Gosh, he is the KING of dweeb monkeys.
clementine_cup
2006-06-17 23:29:51 UTC
They are the government, they dont care. They just keep the inflation going and keep borrowing money they dont have. They probably didn't do very well in economics.
sfavorite711
2006-06-17 23:32:25 UTC
It is easier to get votes with spending programs then cutting programs. Everyone wants spending reduced but they don't want and programs cut.
Stan H
2006-06-17 23:34:19 UTC
It's called "Smoke and Mirrors". Cut taxes and increase spending, get it???
JUNK MAN
2006-06-17 23:32:58 UTC
Somebody has to pay for illegals health care and school.
shasha
2006-06-17 23:41:43 UTC
I agree Bush has got to go!!!
javier r
2006-06-17 23:29:41 UTC
because they can so shut up you liberal beatch
impeachgwb
2006-06-18 00:09:47 UTC
Articles of Impeachment



of



President George W. Bush



and



Vice President Richard B. Cheney,

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice,

Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld, and

Attorney General Alberto Gonzales



The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors. - - ARTICLE II, SECTION 4 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA



President George W. Bush, Vice President Richard B. Cheney, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld, and Attorney General Alberto Gonzales have committed violations and subversions of the Constitution of the United States of America in an attempt to carry out with impunity crimes against peace and humanity and war crimes and deprivations of the civil rights of the people of the United States and other nations, by assuming powers of an imperial executive unaccountable to law and usurping powers of the Congress, the Judiciary and those reserved to the people of the United States, by the following acts:



1) Seizing power to wage wars of aggression in defiance of the U.S. Constitution, the U.N. Charter and the rule of law; carrying out a massive assault on and occupation of Iraq, a country that was not threatening the United States, resulting in the death and maiming of over one hundred thousand Iraqis, and thousands of U.S. G.I.s.



2) Lying to the people of the U.S., to Congress, and to the U.N., providing false and deceptive rationales for war.



3) Authorizing, ordering and condoning direct attacks on civilians, civilian facilities and locations where civilian casualties were unavoidable.



4) Instituting a secret and illegal wiretapping and spying operation against the people of the United States through the National Security Agency.



5) Threatening the independence and sovereignty of Iraq by belligerently changing its government by force and assaulting Iraq in a war of aggression.



6) Authorizing, ordering and condoning assassinations, summary executions, kidnappings, secret and other illegal detentions of individuals, torture and physical and psychological coercion of prisoners to obtain false statements concerning acts and intentions of governments and individuals and violating within the United States, and by authorizing U.S. forces and agents elsewhere, the rights of individuals under the First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and Eighth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.



7) Making, ordering and condoning false statements and propaganda about the conduct of foreign governments and individuals and acts by U.S. government personnel; manipulating the media and foreign governments with false information; concealing information vital to public discussion and informed judgment concerning acts, intentions and possession, or efforts to obtain weapons of mass destruction in order to falsely create a climate of fear and destroy opposition to U.S. wars of aggression and first strike attacks.



8) Violations and subversions of the Charter of the United Nations and international law, both a part of the "Supreme Law of the land" under Article VI, paragraph 2, of the Constitution, in an attempt to commit with impunity crimes against peace and humanity and war crimes in wars and threats of aggression against Afghanistan, Iraq and others and usurping powers of the United Nations and the peoples of its nations by bribery, coercion and other corrupt acts and by rejecting treaties, committing treaty violations, and frustrating compliance with treaties in order to destroy any means by which international law and institutions can prevent, affect, or adjudicate the exercise of U.S. military and economic power against the international community.



9) Acting to strip United States citizens of their constitutional and human rights, ordering indefinite detention of citizens, without access to counsel, without charge, and without opportunity to appear before a civil judicial officer to challenge the detention, based solely on the discretionary designation by the Executive of a citizen as an "enemy combatant."



10) Ordering indefinite detention of non-citizens in the United States and elsewhere, and without charge, at the discretionary designation of the Attorney General or the Secretary of Defense.



11) Ordering and authorizing the Attorney General to override judicial orders of release of detainees under INS jurisdiction, even where the judicial officer after full hearing determines a detainee is wrongfully held by the government.



12) Authorizing secret military tribunals and summary execution of persons who are not citizens who are designated solely at the discretion of the Executive who acts as indicting official, prosecutor and as the only avenue of appellate relief.



13) Refusing to provide public disclosure of the identities and locations of persons who have been arrested, detained and imprisoned by the U.S. government in the United States, including in response to Congressional inquiry.



14) Use of secret arrests of persons within the United States and elsewhere and denial of the right to public trials.



15) Authorizing the monitoring of confidential attorney-client privileged communications by the government, even in the absence of a court order and even where an incarcerated person has not been charged with a crime.



16) Ordering and authorizing the seizure of assets of persons in the United States, prior to hearing or trial, for lawful or innocent association with any entity that at the discretionary designation of the Executive has been deemed "terrorist."



17) Engaging in criminal neglect in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, depriving thousands of people in Louisiana, Mississippi and other Gulf States of urgently needed support, causing mass suffering and unnecessary loss of life.



18) Institutionalization of racial and religious profiling and authorization of domestic spying by federal law enforcement on persons based on their engagement in noncriminal religious and political activity.



19) Refusal to provide information and records necessary and appropriate for the constitutional right of legislative oversight of executive functions.



20) Rejecting treaties protective of peace and human rights and abrogation of the obligations of the United States under, and withdrawal from, international treaties and obligations without consent of the legislative branch, and including termination of the ABM treaty between the United States and Russia, and rescission of the authorizing signature from the Treaty of Rome which served as the basis for the International Criminal Court.
dawn h
2006-06-17 23:31:17 UTC
INHERITED !!!!!


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...