Question:
Why do people hate bush?
Foodaholic
2006-11-12 20:46:49 UTC
Ok, when 9/11 happened, people were all like, "YEAH, BUSH!!! He's so cool!" What the heck happened? Bush did something that I think most people would've been afraid to do. Do you think Al Gore would've declared war on Iraq? I don't think so. When he announced it, everybody was happy. Now what? I fell bad for the guy. he didn't do anything wrong or bad as far as I'm concerned, and I want to know why people hat him.
46 answers:
Cinner
2006-11-12 21:08:43 UTC
Wow, it looks like some of these people are a little (or alot) kooky. Don't feel alone, there are many of us out here who feel as you do. He did not start the war based on a lie. There were intelligence reports from MANY countries that all said the same thing. He doesn't hate Mexicans...geez, he wants to give the illegals a break for God Sake! The war is not about oil if it was why aren't we paying .50 a gallon. Iraq needs to use that money to rebuild and support it's people. He is not murdering women and children. He is not Satan. I believe he is a sincere man who is doing the best he can. The media also plays a big part in people's perceptions of him. Anyone who says the media is not a liberal propaganda machine is a liar. Then there are those who believe whatever Alec Baldwin, the Dixie Chicks, Barbra Streisand, David Letterman, Jon Stewart etc. tell them to believe. They are all so well educated you know!

Keep your head up....don't let these freaks get to you. You are the sane one NOT them.
spareo1
2006-11-12 21:11:39 UTC
In general I thought he was OK and the war was a necessary evil. The last 2 yrs it seemed obvious that our troops were out-numbered and out-armed thus resulting in so many unnecessary deaths. On C-SPAN Book, many vets have been interviewed and one said it was 5 to 1 in favor of terrorists. Another described the tribal warlords as fierce when they started b4 Christ and when they got 'Allah's' word to kill, they were like to the square more terrible. A vet's dad called in and said his son had head wounds from war but had a ruff time w/the VA-others said the same. One said they had bad communication and were sent in when no one was said to be there, but they were wrong. A British reporter w/the troops revealed a secret op in his paper putting everyone in danger and simply said he asked their permission but they didn't respond. They saw 9 spec op guys die due to a bad decision. I've heard at least a handful of govt people remark recently that the troops are short handed. It seems such an injustice all around no wonder 99% of the guys are mentally injured, but none of them actually stated their stories as a complaint just a fact. Booo on this negligence(and I'm not speaking politically).
Action
2006-11-12 21:01:25 UTC
They would have hated Bush even MORE if he had done NOTHING after 9/11.



A lot of reference is being made to his perceived poor presentation at times, so I sense a little regional culture prejudice in this country and it bothers me. Give the guy a break.
dharmabear
2006-11-13 00:41:18 UTC
Foodaholic...Don't take this the wrong way but i find it sort of ironic and amusing that you feel sorry for George Bush.....especially by the fact that you tied it in with 911. I truly believe that George Bush and the administration knew about the plan on 911 before it happened and did have something to do with it! i think that they allowed it all to happen to get as in a war in the middle east. This is why I people hate him. I personally don't HATE him but I would like to see him face justice for war crimes against humanity.
2016-11-29 07:18:05 UTC
i replaced into all in favour of Bush highly after 9/11, idea he began a very good interest in Afghanstan, yet he desserted that and went to Iraq lower than pretend motives and then i began to compared to him, said by quite a few failed polices and many adjustments in how he replaced into going to run issues, the Katrina mess the shortcoming of doing something for the monetary device formerly it befell and then his entire smartassness in those variety of circumstances. if Obama makes similiar mistakes i am going to experience an similar way about him.
2006-11-12 21:01:11 UTC
I know what you mean, perhaps he was the right president at the right time.



However he has less diplomatic skills than some of his predecessors. He is a very strong speaker which is a good quality.



Remember that just under 50% of people that voted did not vote for him and therefore will most likely oppose his decisions.



Also it is illegal since the formation of the united nations to declare war on any particular country. So Bush has not declared war on Iraq. He declared war on the corrupt regime of Saddam Hussein. This war was a success. Unfortunatley the troops are left overseas defending Iraq and trying to help rebuild. Many people are now thinking that it is time to try and bring the troops home and let them get a good hold of their own country.



It has now been quite some time since the success of the defeat of Saddam Hussein so now all that is seen is the deaths of troops by random attacks by terrorists.



Also consider that Bush is making a larger moral decision than a political decision and is taking the heat for it because he believes it is the right thing to do. This also shows great character strength, but unfortunately many view it as weakness.
nebtet
2006-11-12 21:06:20 UTC
well, i NEVER trusted GW Bush, not even as he stood in front of the rubble of the Twin Towers with a megaphone but after 9/11 i was upset and ready to back the actions that would catch the perpetrators of that mass murder. and then he went in to Iraq. and it's not just that he went into Iraq... he went into Iraq in a big hurry. he wouldn't let the weapons inspectors finish their job. and he racketed up the WMD rhetoric to a scream, the mushroom clouds, the yellow cake. for many years secular Saddam had no truck with religious zealots and had been watched and kept under control. now suddenly he was training terrorists and was an immediate threat. i just did not buy it.

and no. i doubt Gore would have invaded Iraq, at least not until the weapons were finished and he had some kind of consensus with the world community.

you don't think GW did anything bad or wrong because you haven't done your research and you aren't an Iraqi sitting in the pile of broken rocks that was your home holding the bloodied body on one of your beloveds and you're not a veteran of the Iraq occupation sitting an a wheelchair without your arms and legs.
wonderme
2006-11-12 21:00:15 UTC
Well there is so many reasons for it that I just don't have the time to put them down but I think more than anything else he will be remembered as a President who not only degraded the office of the President of the United States but also his tactics in the war on terror took away the "fear" of United States as being the Super Power.



It is not a coincidence that countries like, Iran, North Korea, Venezuela talk eye to eye with America.
AD
2006-11-12 21:02:08 UTC
If you are saying 9/11 was not a direct reason for declaring war. Could you more elaborate, or at least hive some hyperbolic analysis of your question.

Thank you
2006-11-12 21:03:28 UTC
Why do people hate Bush?



Well, aside from the fact that the man is a bonafide idiot... and I'm not being insulting here, I'm not exaggerating to make a point... he's an actual idiot (and I don't blame him for that. It's not his fault that he's an idiot)...aside from that... it took him HOW long to get help to the Hurricane victims in New Orleans? And where were the weapons of mass destruction that he used to justify the war? And how many thousands of innocent people has he killed in the war? And what has happened to the U.S. economy since he's taken power? And what has he done to stem terrorism in the world? And what is his plan to deal with Bird flu? And where is Bin Laden? And why did he allow Rumsfeld to stay on this long? And how many of his inept friends has he given jobs to? And the list goes on and on and on...



People hate Bush because he's done a great deal of harm and obsolutely no good. He's an embarrassment domestically and internationally. He's, singularily, the most foolish man who's occupied the oval office since the White House was erected.



And to top it off... he can't speak coherent english.
Mike F
2006-11-12 22:29:57 UTC
the people that hate President Bush are the liberals. That's because they're afraid of doing what had to be done. At least Bush had the balls. It's as simple as that.
dakota29575
2006-11-12 21:05:58 UTC
I think the people who say they hate President Bush are the people who would have hated any Republican President.

I can understand not agreeing with the President, but hating him?

The fact is Bush declared war on terror because he believed it was the right thing to do, based on the Intel he received from England and the CIA. If you had lost loved ones on 9/11 wouldn't you want all of the culprits found? It was reported many times how Sodom gave funding to Al Qaeda, and we did find chemical weapons which are weapons of mass destruction. I won't fall for the tricks again and give web addresses so you can report me for spam.
Brianne
2006-11-12 20:55:34 UTC
The liberals and Democrats weren't happy that he won the 2nd time around in a historical election.He won both electorial and popular vote!! They were on their way to the big bashing feast when 9/11 hit. Of course this brought everyone togeather for a time but it didn't take long for the libs and demo's to forget and pick up where they left off challanging Bushs every move if it didn't agree with them. I'm glad to see you have compassion for him because he's had a real tough job trying to do the right thing with 9/11, the war and the division of this country. As for Al Gore, Clinton or any of the others they could of done exactly as Bush and been applauded. It's a sad state of affairs.
spongeworthy_us
2006-11-12 21:06:26 UTC
He and his administration are war criminals, just like the Nazis and the Japanese military during WWII.



If there is any justice in this world, everyone in his administration having to do with the "war on terror" (including but not limited to Dubya, Cheney, Rice, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Alberto Gonzales, Ashcroft, Libby and Rove) should suffer the same fate as the war criminals of WWII - hanging by the neck until they are dead.
Franklin
2006-11-12 21:10:55 UTC
Is it really that hard to understand? The war on terror is a joke. The war in Iraq is a mess. And his domestic policies are horrible.



Time to figure out that people change their minds. Republicans call it flip-floping...Americans call it thinking.
2006-11-12 20:55:49 UTC
because bush doesn't actually care what the majority of the people want, I hated the guy because I knew he was going to follow in his fathers footsteps and I hated him before we got attacked. republicans always seem hell bent on destroying the economy and us going to war, well unless you come from a rich and ignorant stuck up family you really don't see what is going on, we are never going to capture Osama Bin Laden, he has no intentions of that, we are over there right now so we can control the oil, and that is all this war is about,that and the fact that we are still entitled to having our own opinions is exactly why people hate him, but I am sure if George Bush could control that he would as well, by the way were you aware that his approval ratings are down to around 30% right now? Yeah so about 70% of us hate him now, what I want to know is why there are any people out there that support him at all, oh and to notyou311 response of they did not have weapons of mass destruction, well yes they did and there was a reason they were so sure that they had them, they knew that they had them because they were given to them by us when his father was running the show, you must have missed out on that one, it's cool though, happy to be the one to inform you of this
2006-11-12 21:08:26 UTC
In your your question you said "When he announced it(the war), everybody was happy." If you think 'everybody' was "happy" when he announced the war you are living in a dream world and I am not going to waste any time trying to burst your bubble.



You are a child and need to expand your information sources.

It is statements like yours that make me shake my head in wonder and dispair.
2006-11-12 21:11:55 UTC
You would be hard pressed to find a liberal lesbian that does not love Bush. Just a factual statement that must drive them crazy!
navdeepkaur
2006-11-12 20:53:47 UTC
Look. Let me give you the lowdown here.

HE's a politician.

WE are the american public.

Its our JOB to talk crap about him.



Plus, I think that he could have handled a few situations a little better. Just a little.



And some of us don't exactly hate him.

We just very strongly dislike him.
notyou311
2006-11-12 20:53:19 UTC
Do you live in a cave or something? Do you still not understand that the war was based on a lie? Iraq did not attack us and they did not have weapons of mass destruction. You feel bad for a guy who got us into a war for no reason that killed over 200, 000 of our troops and almost a million Iraqis? What about running up the biggest deficit in history that your kids and grandkids will have to pay off? Don't forget how he left people to die in New Orleans either. To top it off, he protected people like Mark Foley and Jack Abramoff. Much more is yet to come out about corruption in this adminstration which is worse than Nixon's.

Here is the man you admire:



http://www.cutepiggy.com/george_w_bush.html
Carol May
2006-11-12 20:58:16 UTC
1. Bush and his oligarchic companions sabotaged American democracy so they could pillage taxpayer resources.

2. Bush and his cabal of henchmen lied to the American people about Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq, and they continue to obfuscate the truth while their companies cash in, Iraqis suffer and American soldiers die.

3. Bush is bad for business and the economy. He is only interested in enriching himself and his friends.

4. Bush is bad for the future. He is compromising the prosperity of tomorrow's America by shortchanging today's children.

5. Bush is bad for the environment.

6. The Bush Administration has manipulated the media to the point of undermining the Constitutional guarantees of a Free Press.

7. Bush has tried to undermine the United Nations, a democratic institution created in large measure by Presidents Eisenhower and Truman. Without even understanding what the UN does, Bush has called it "irrelevant" when it fails to fall in line with his dictates.

8. Bush is inarticulate and projects a stereotype abroad of Americans being ignorant and myopic.

9. Bush torpedoes global agreements on everything from racism and global warming to biological weapons and land mines, and then expects the world to line up behind him.

10. Bush took positive patriotism and global support in the wake of 9/11 and forced it behind his own narrow self-interest in Iraq. He hijacked 9/11 for his own benefit.

11. Bush stands against everything America stands for.
sparkletina
2006-11-12 20:56:28 UTC
Because democrats/liberals have been trained in college by liberal professors to accept what the party tells them without questioning. They hear the leaders and mouths like Al Franken and Michael Moore talk hate and assume it is true. Watch and see how many accuse the Republicans of the same thing. The difference is Republicans/conservatives will attempt a dialogue but liberals will start name calling before long.
2006-11-12 20:55:52 UTC
I don't like bush because it gets stuck in my teeth and I think chicks should trim the bush. Everyone's happy with bush until it get's too thick.
2006-11-12 20:49:32 UTC
i can only speak for myself, but for me it is because although I believe the war on terror is a good thing, the war on American freedom and rights is bad, and aimed at more firmly establishing a dictatorship.

And soccer , the US government don't hate Mexicans, they hate illegals taking American jobs, you know those the lazy Americans wont do because foreign labor keeps the pay scale to low to live on
Huevos Rancheros
2006-11-12 21:04:01 UTC
They hate him because a big fat pig named Michael Moore made a movie for the liberals. Liberals wanted this movie made because they hated the fact that Bush was so popular and it scared them. They knew they had to do something before their agenda (abortion, gay marriage, embryonic stem cells) would be destroyed. So they made a little movie to make people pissed of at him and his administration. What better subject than 9/11. Make Bush look responsible for what happened, and BAM....instant hate for Bush.
2006-11-12 20:49:37 UTC
No were not all stupid thank you. I hate bush because i think he could have done a better job with 9/11 and with katrina, and a couple other things. HE just all around sucks and i can't wait to get him out of office.
thedeadintheworld
2006-11-12 20:52:51 UTC
1. I hated Bush before it was cool to hate Bush

2. You're right, Al Gore wouldn't have declared war on Iraq, because he isn't an idiot
rosbif
2006-11-12 20:50:35 UTC
One major flaw with your question is that Iraq (Saddam Hussein) had absolutely nothing to do with the events of 9/11.

Bush is incompetent and is slowly but surely screwing your country into the ground
ramz
2006-11-12 20:52:54 UTC
For having sent troops to kill innocent people like women and children in Irak while troops are being ambushed by terrorists. At the same time he is thinking that poor innocent illegal immigrants are invading which they don't. They just come to work. So tell me??? Why hasn't Bush sought Bin Laden??? Why does he have to mess up our fate and even worse, those women and children. Do u still feel sympathy???
CumQuaT
2006-11-12 20:49:01 UTC
I think it's just because he seems so clumsy and reckless. He jumps into situations like a cowbow, with guns blazing and making all these ridiculous statements that end up just making him look stupid. In short, I think people hate Bush because he is everything that the general public DON'T expect a politician to be.
brian2412
2006-11-12 20:50:46 UTC
He calls himself a Christian, yet employs men such as Karl Rove who run viscous smear campaigns on his opponents (ask John McCain). He comes off as very arrogant and self-centered. He refuses to admit mistakes nor does he seem to listen to other viewpoints. Thats why I don't have much respect for him.
Abbey Road
2006-11-12 20:52:29 UTC
I just hate anyone who encourage war, and even more if in his hands there is a power to stop it. Hundreds of americans and arabians and people in general, are dying every once in a while, and why, because some people say that they want to stop terrorism, pleaseeeeeeee
nobudE
2006-11-12 20:53:20 UTC
i think people dislike bush because he says dumb sounding things and he reeks of boozey frat boy who's dad bought him his whole life. he seems like a puppet,and they don' see him having a hand in any decision that's been made. and these are just as good and valid as your reasons to hate clinton, which i think are bullsh*t.
ML
2006-11-12 20:52:46 UTC
Because the country is full of people with attention deficit disorder.
Kellisimo
2006-11-12 20:50:48 UTC
Kanye West-"George Bush does not care about black people" LOL
Betty Boop
2006-11-12 20:48:07 UTC
He caused a war without evidence....
sngozig
2006-11-12 20:50:13 UTC
people don't hate bush. He just needs to get his fact and priorities straight before he jump to make life threatening decisions
Joe D
2006-11-12 20:50:07 UTC
because the media can say what they want about him because we have the freedom of speech and the press, so what sells is to talk down about him, and all we hear is what the media says about him.
2006-11-12 20:52:53 UTC
No Gore would have put his tail betwine his legs and run off to some island.

the liberals do not like anyone that will stand up for human rights . they want the world to fall apart so that they can run everyones lives like they do in the social welfare system
yupchagee
2006-11-12 20:51:47 UTC
Some people just like to hate. It's what they do.
2006-11-12 20:50:12 UTC
Hey jousting!! "They hate Bush because they're too stupid to know that democrat propaganda is just that."



If its just THAT SIMPLE than you have to admit that some of the same "stupids" who voted democrat this time also voted BUSH the first two times!! >:P'
007
2006-11-12 20:53:08 UTC
because the secular left wing idiots don't like the fact that he is religious. And for that reason they will negotiate with the devil to cross him. In this case the devil is terrorist
jmt4127
2006-11-12 20:48:01 UTC
I cant believe your asking this question...........
joustingwindmills
2006-11-12 20:47:42 UTC
They hate Bush because they're too stupid to know that democrat propaganda is just that.
2006-11-12 21:24:24 UTC
I think it is a certainty that Gore would not have attacked Iraq. He is far too smart and cares too much about America to do something that was, simultaneously, outrageously stupid and wholly detrimental to the best interests of the United States.



The neocons tried to pressure both the first president Bush and then Clinton to invade Iraq and try to implement there plan to spread the American way through military conquest. However, they both were too smart to go for it. Former President G.H.W. Bush, in his book ‘A World Transformed’ detailed why invading Iraq would inevitably turn into exactly the quagmire mess in which we now find ourselves.



In fact, almost every Middle East expert in the world predicted the same thing. Colin Powell even told Bush to his face , “if you break it, then you own it”. However, that did not penetrate Bush’s thick skull either. Unfortunately, slow-witted George came along and then 9/11 gave them the perfect opportunity.



Then there is the Republican Senate’s report on Iraq prewar intelligence (September 2006), which makes it clear that:



•There were NO terrorists in Iraq before Bush invaded;

•There was no connection between Iraq and Bin-Laden, Al-Qaeda, or any terrorist organization;

•Hussein did not provide training camps to terrorists;

•Hussein hated AQ before we did;

•Hussein did not hide al-Zargawi he tried to have him arrested.



And, of course, there were no weapons of mass destruction.



Bush has lost Afghanistan. The Taliban is stronger than ever there, and opium production is a record levels providing funding for terrorist organizations. Bush has lost Iraq (he had to lose there since it was never winnable). He has destroyed honor and dignity in the world community.



More importantly, if Clinton or Gore had been president in 2000, 9/11 might never have happened.



Only weeks after Clinton took office in 1993 (following 12 straight years of Republican presidents), terrorist scum tried to bring down the towers.



What did Clinton do?



•within a month, four people were arrested,

•they went on trial that September,

•the trial lasted 6 months, and

•they were all convicted



Are you aware that Clinton stopped eight 9/11-size attacks, despite a Republican Congress that tried to stop his every move?



Are you aware that the very first thing that Clinton did, as he was leaving the White House and Bush was moving in, was to tell Bush that the single greatest threat to the safety of the American people was Osama Bin-Laden. He had his staff stress to Bush’s staff that this was the most important thing Bush needed to know now that he was President.



Are you aware that on August 6, 2001, Bush received a PDBM (President's Daily Briefing Memo) warning that:



- OBL was planning an attack inside the United States, and

- that he might use airplanes, and

- that the targets would be politically important (DC) and major metropolitan centers (NYC)?



Are you aware that Bush, Rice, and the rest of the Bush administration ignored the memo?



Are you aware that the Bush administration abandoned the Israeli – Palestinian issue?



Here’s a brief summary of the differences in how Clinton and Bush dealt with America’s terrorist threat:



Clinton vs. Terror, Republicans vs. Clinton

-------------------------------------------------------



President Clinton led the fight against terrorism over strong opposition from Republicans in Congress and the pro-Republican Media. Here's a partial - yet incredibly long - list of accomplishments against terrorism for which the Clinton Administration gets almost no credit or even recognition. President Clinton:



•sent legislation to Congress to TIGHTEN AIRPORT SECURITY. (Remember, this is before 911) The legislation was defeated by the Republicans because of opposition from the airlines.



•sent legislation to Congress to allow for BETTER TRACKING OF TERRORIST FUNDING. It was defeated by Republicans in the Senate because of opposition from banking interests.



•sent legislation to Congress to add tagents to explosives, to allow for BETTER TRACKING OF EXPLOSIVES USED BY TERRORISTS. It was defeated by the Republicans because of opposition from the NRA.



When Republicans couldn't prevent executive action, President Clinton:



•Developed the nation's first anti-terrorism policy, and appointed first national coordinator.



•Stopped cold the planned attack to blow up 12 U.S. jetliners simultaneously.



•Stopped cold the planned attack to blow up UN Headquarters.



•Stopped cold the planned attack to blow up FBI Headquarters.



•Stopped cold the planned attack to blow up the Israeli Embassy in Washington.



•--Stopped cold the planned attack to blow up Boston airport.



•Stopped cold the planned attack to blow up Lincoln and Holland Tunnels in NY.



•Stopped cold the planned attack to blow up the George Washington Bridge.



•Stopped cold the planned attack to blow up the US Embassy in Albania.



•Tried to kill Osama bin Laden and disrupt Al Qaeda through preemptive strikes (efforts denounced by the G.O.P.).



•Brought perpetrators of first World Trade Center bombing and CIA killings to justice.



•Did not blame Bush I administration for first World Trade Center bombing even though it occurred 38 days after they had left office. Instead, worked hard, even obsessively -- and successfully -- to stop future terrorist attacks.



•Named the Hart-Rudman commission to report on nature of terrorist threats and major steps to be taken to combat terrorism.



•Tripled the budget of the FBI for counterterrorism and doubled overall funding for counterterrorism.



•Detected and destroyed cells of Al Qaeda in over 20 countries



•Created a national stockpile of drugs and vaccines including 40 million doses of smallpox vaccine.



•Robert Oakley, Reagan Counterterrorism Czar says of Clinton's efforts "Overall, I give them very high marks" and "The only major criticism I have is the obsession with Osama"



•Paul Bremer, Bush's Administrator of Iraq disagrees slightly with Robert Oakley saying he believed the Clinton Administration had "correctly focused on bin Laden. "



•Barton Gellman of the Washington Post put it best, "By any measure available, Clinton left office having given greater priority to terrorism than any president before him" and was the "first administration to undertake a systematic anti-terrorist effort."



Here, in stark contrast, is part of the Bush-Cheney anti-terrorism record before September 11, 2001:



oBacked off Clinton administration's anti-terrorism efforts.



oShelved the Hart-Rudman report.



oAppointed new anti-terrorism task force under Dick Cheney. Group did not even meet before 9/11.



oCalled for cuts in anti-terrorism efforts by the Department of Defense.



oGave no priority to anti-terrorism efforts by Justice Department.



oIgnored warnings from Sandy Berger, Louis Freeh, George Tennant, Paul Bremer, and Richard Clarke about the urgency of terrorist threats.



oWatered Down 1996 Clinton Anti-Terrorism Bill, Thanks to Lott & Hatch



oHalted Predator drone tracking of Osama bin Laden.



oDid nothing in wake of August 6 C.I.A. report to president saying Al Qaeda attack by hijack of an airliner almost certain.



oBush - knowing about the terrorists' plans to attack in America, warned that terrorists were in flight schools in the US - took a four week vacation.



oBy failing to order any coordination of intelligence data, missed opportunity to stop the 9/11 plot as Clinton-Gore had stopped the millennium plots.





--------------------------------------

An Excuse-Spouting Bush Is Busted by 9/11 Report



As early as May 2001, the FBI was receiving tips that Bin Laden supporters were planning attacks in the U.S., possibly including the hijacking of planes. On May 29, White House counter-terrorism chief Richard Clarke wrote national security advisor Condoleezza Rice that when these attacks [on Israeli or U.S. facilities] occur, as they likely will, we will wonder what more we could have done to stop them.



At the end of June, the commission wrote, "the intelligence reporting consistently described the upcoming attacks as occurring on a calamitous level." In early July, Atty. Gen. John Ashcroft was told "that preparations for multiple attacks [by Al Qaeda] were in late stages or already complete and that little additional warning could be expected." By month's end, "the system was blinking red" and could not "get any worse," then-CIA Director George Tenet told the 9/11 commission.



It was at this point, of course, that George W. Bush began the longest presidential vacation in 32 years. On the very first day of his visit to his Texas ranch, Aug. 6, Bush received the now-infamous two-page intelligence alert titled, Bin Laden Determined to Attack in the United States. Yet instead of returning to the capital to mobilize an energetic defensive posture, he spent an additional 27 days away as the government languished in summer mode, in deep denial.



"In sum," said the 9/11 commission report, "the domestic agencies never mobilized in response to the threat..."

http://www.globalissues.org/Geopolitics/WarOnTerr [...]



If only he HAD done nothing, but he actually made the situation worse.



Soon after inauguration, Bush quietly ended the Cole investigation and withdrew the team of over 100 FBI and JTTF (Joint Terrorism Task Force) agents that Clinton had sent to Yemen to investigate the Cole bombing.



Then, in March of 2001, when the task force sent the White House their final report, which implicated bin Laden and named al Qaeda operative Khalid Shaikh Mohammed as the architect of the bombing, Bush and Rice simply shelved the report and took no action against al Qaeda. Mohammed went on to be the chief architect of the 9/11 attacks.



Later, after Mohammed was captured in Pakistan, he told his American interrogators that it was specifically Bush's failure to follow through with the Cole investigation - and particularly his failure to come after Mohammed - that convinced him that al Qaeda could mount the 9/11 attacks and get away with them.



It will always be a moot question whether White House diligence and attention could have prevented the 9/11 attacks, but it is a given that failure to act against the Cole bombers and failure to heed the multiple warnings about future attacks simply opened our doors wide to attack and made bin Laden's task simple.
soccer kisses!!!!!!!!
2006-11-12 20:48:48 UTC
HE DONT LIKE MEXICANS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...