Question:
Dirty politics: Democrats release Palin's social security information... hasn't it gone too far already?
2008-09-02 18:48:50 UTC
http://www.redstate.com/diaries/redstate/2008/sep/02/breaking-democrats-release-sarah-palins-soc/
Nine answers:
2008-09-02 19:07:20 UTC
I say Ph*uck that bigotted website! They are full of $hi+ !
Electronherdsman
2008-09-03 02:00:33 UTC
After everything that has been thrown at Palin in the last 4 days nothing surprises me. I'll just add this to the list. I cannot believe how desperate the left is to destroy this woman. She must really scare the crap out of them.
Vaughn
2008-09-03 16:34:27 UTC
Actually, Politico.com released the information, not "the Democrats." We assume that someone working at Politico happens to vote Democrat or Independent, as surely as we assume someone who writes for Redstate.com votes Republican, but that doesn't make this a move by "The Democrats."



And thank goodness, because you're right. That kind of information is way beyond anyone's need-to-know, despite that Politico apparently redacted part of the number. (Doesn't make it right, but it's an important part of the story nevertheless).



EDIT: Speaking of dirty tricks? I just went to Politico.com--which your source cites as the ones who published this information-- and there isn't a single mention of this supposed "leaked document."
Kitten,Doc
2008-09-03 02:04:15 UTC
Does it not amaze you that day before yesterday there were hundreds of links to Sarah and her daughters baby and it was "gospel truth" , Now if it is against the Dem's it is slanderous trash to smear someones "good" name. It just completely amazes me. That no matter what reputable proof you offer now it holds no grounds. They have nothing on her as they did the first day she was announced they have been called on it by there shepherd and now they are conching at the bid, they cant desecrate.
Huey Freeman
2008-09-03 02:00:09 UTC
You know I'd really like an explanation as to how these "Democrats" could have gotten her SSN legally. If your story is the least bit true, whatever it is, that's a criminal act. If you have any supporting evidence, any at all, please attach it to your "reliable source."
smsmith500
2008-09-03 01:54:31 UTC
I don't see where that information has any relevance.
2008-09-03 01:54:27 UTC
AGAIN I CAN POST A LINK THAT SAYS MCCAIN IS OSAMA BIN LADENS GRANDPA ...JUST BECAUSE ITS IN PRINT DONT MEAN ITS TRUE
waruibuff
2008-09-03 01:53:31 UTC
the republicans crossed that line a long time ago! Deal with it!
shina
2008-09-03 01:53:40 UTC
Not credible - lie.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...