Teabags, you say you have no leader, but I say your leader is some abstract delusional entity?

Question

Who usually goes by the name of God™ ? Other more recent pseudonyms are, Free [Anarchist] Market™, Supreme [non-statist] Authority™ (yeah right, no oxymoron here), Jesus™, America™ The Christain Nation™, and many others.


Please defend yourselves.


How do I know this?

1. Because you constantly project your notions of leadership 'requisite' onto everyone else. Everyone really has a leader, right teabags? Except you of course. Yeah right.
2. You are so hell bent on gaining power for someone you think is just like you, so they can lead you.
3. You don't care at all when this abstract delusion is invoked. Do you really think that once in power, your precious teabag libertard leaders will be content to let people displease their God™? Hell they can't even handle it now. Look how desperate they get when you attack the God™ of the Free Market.
4. You think collectivism is great, but only if everyone collectivizes over the worship of your God™ or its pseudonyms. Any other 'collectivism' or 'team', no matter how freely joined thoroughly disgusts you.

Answer 1

I don't think the Tea Party movement is any of the things you describe. It has more to do with paying for the stuff you buy than with any refference to God or other such identifiers.



This is a movement about a fundemental idea. They are willing to elect nut jobs because the typical multi millionsares we sent to washington so far have gotten us nowhere. Why not take a single idea and elect anyone from any party who will uphold that idea?

Answer 2

With the exception of Scott Brown, whom most the Tea Party seem to dislike now.. all of the candidates they support, seem to be fundamentalist Christians that have a wacked out view of what most Americans want. The Tea Party is for anything other than ensuring our liberties, they want the nanny state more than any other group, yet continue to deny it while their votes and supporters here obviously continue to state their desire to end the country of what they consider immorality through law. Whilst at the same time an incredibly large amount of them are for fighting in the Middle East, and spending ridiculous amounts of money securing our border.



Their delusion of a smaller government is laughable, as the costs involved and the man power to ensure their nanny state remains in place will by far surpass every government program they plan to abolish.

Answer 3

by way of fact he had 0 kit for the activity. He had no govt experience, no employer experience, and no armed forces experience. Hillary Clinton and John McCain pointed this fact out repeatedly, yet American electorate of their stupidity voted for Obama. he's in excess of his head. He does no longer have .what it takes to steer. He spouts off issues others write. he's no longer something yet an orator, and communicate is decrease priced. the project is that Obama is on considered one of those great ego holiday he would not even comprehend he's a failure.

Answer 4

It's about the ideas the started this country to begin with, Cut out the BS of the RINOs and liberal/progressives. It's not beyond repair, get behind the idea.

Answer 5

You are so far off, and so full of misinformation there isn't the time or space to correct all of your misconceptions. Don't believe what you hear, just do a bit of research.

Answer 6

What do you mean no leader? Rush, Hannity, Palin, Beck..



@Rocco - why would this question be deleted? Do you so quickly assume that all conservatives will report a question they don't like?

Answer 7

Congrats - this question should be deleted in under 5 minutes. Gotta be a new record.

Answer 8

their leader is either Lipton or Nestea

Answer 9

Been sniffing your own chloroform?

Answer 10

Another liberal opens their mouth..

Another liberal looks like an idiot..