Question:
If President Bush had committed an impeachable offense..Then why haven't the Democrats in Congress not acted.
Dina W
2007-06-21 19:36:26 UTC
Do you people who really think Bush should/could be impeached not think that Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi would be on the television every night until they received the votes they needed from the other Congressmen and Senators to do it.

Please, start using some common sense, and come up with some questions that are realistic.
Sixteen answers:
YahooAnswersIsFun
2007-06-21 19:40:06 UTC
TWO WORDS:



Dick........Cheney
justgetitright
2007-06-22 02:48:29 UTC
I hear a lot of debate on this forum about how both Bush

and Cheney have committed impeachable offenses. I

have also said that if this were true then why hasn't the

Democrats filed the charges, I have come up with a few

possible answers on my own on why they would not file.

I had to come up with my own answers because not a

single person could give me one. Here they are.



1.) There are no impeachable offenses against either Bush

or Cheney.



2.) There are against Bush, but they don't want Cheney to

be the President.



3.) There are offenses against both but they don't want

Nancy Pelosi in charge



Of course the obvious answer is #1 otherwise they would

have filed impeachment charges against both, and then just

lived with Pelosi for 1 year and give her no backing.



EDIT: Note to George W B, if Clinton did not lie during the

investigation, was he then lying when he came out publicly

and said "I did in fact have sex with Monica Lewinksi"



Note to The real Ed-Mike

And just where is this worthless piece of paper now?

it certainly in not sitting in the House Judiciary.
jl_jack09
2007-06-22 02:48:37 UTC
Get a clue. Impeachment starts in the House and ends in the Senate, Democrats do not have the votes in the Senate. That never stopped Republicans. The investigations and impeachment hearings will start about Oct. or Nov. 2008. After hearings on the long list of crimes in office Republicans may support the impeachment, either way Democrats will use the investigations before Nov. 2008.. Now have some more cool aid..
anonymous
2007-06-22 02:58:28 UTC
The democrats have not tried to impeach W for two reasons:



1) The are gutless, spineless cowards.



2) In the game of Realpolitik, the democrats don't play to win...which is why W is in office right now.



Believe me, W deserves to be impeached...W, Dicky, Rummy...all of them...
Enigma
2007-06-22 02:46:31 UTC
First they have to prove he is guilty of an impeachable offense. Thats what they have been trying to do but they have to start at the horse's a$$ by going after Alberto Gonzales to get to Dick Cheney to get to Bush. You get the picture. Its a tough row to hoe when Gonzales just testifies under oath "I don't recall, I don't remember that." Then you have all the deleted e-mails blah blah blah. The Democrats just got there about 4 years to late to get the evidence they need. I still keep hoping though.
Chi Guy
2007-06-22 02:41:44 UTC
Does it take a majority of the reps to pass? How is the process initiated?



Not to mention with his admin cronies committing perjury, losing emails, and selectively losing their memory, is Impeachment possible?



A good answer would be that considering the war in Iraq, unlike the neo-cons, the Dems may feel that the nation has enough on its plate as it is.
George W. B
2007-06-22 03:44:04 UTC
cuz the Dems stated they wouldn't bother dragging the country thru all that mess and cost.....unlike the total witch hunt the Repugs did on Clinton.



Do you even recall the "original" impeachable offense the Repugs claimed on Clinton?



Do you recall how many of these bogus claims they had to come up with and burn out on before they were able to find one....a BJ...?



Do you realize they impeached him for actually telling the truth?

Of course not, they all just scream he lied under oath.



Read the transcripts, he did NOT lie.



What do they claim he lied about?

Having "sexual relations" with Monica.

The Repugs own definition of "sexual relations"?

"Intercourse"



They never, NEVER had "intercourse" and thus "sexual relations".

So legally (and Clinton is/was a lawyer) he answered the question correctly when he answered "no, I did not have sexual relations with her"...cuz he didn't...they didn't have intercourse, she gave him a freakin BJ.



Go read it for yourself.
Dona A
2007-06-22 02:41:51 UTC
I think it's nice that someone is listening to the American public. I think the majority of people made it clear that they didn't want impeachment so the Democrats listened.



The Republican Party could learn something from them. Listen to "We the People" for a change.
diamond_kursed
2007-06-22 02:45:09 UTC
All public figures could be impeached.
Plumbingfool
2007-06-22 02:41:07 UTC
They are benefiting from the same system, as he is. It doesn't take a genius to look at the many reasons for impeachment.
and socialism
2007-06-22 02:42:56 UTC
Bush did nothing illegal!! So he cannot be impeached!!! It is that simple.
anonymous
2007-06-22 02:41:26 UTC
There are NO reasons for impeachment of this President!!!! and they bloody well know it!
Kristin
2007-06-22 02:40:26 UTC
he's done nothing to be impeached. the end.

pelosi is a joke.
Lindsey G
2007-06-22 02:43:15 UTC
THEY NEED A MAJORITY OF REPRESENTATIVES!
anonymous
2007-06-22 02:40:31 UTC
nobody, and i mean NOBODY wants Cheney
The real Ed-Mike
2007-06-22 07:24:14 UTC
H. Res. 1106

Articles of Impeachment against George Walker Bush, President of the United States of America, and other officials, for high crimes and misdemeanors.

_____________________________

IN THE HOUSE OF

REPESENTATIVES

DECEMBER 8, 2006

Ms. McKINNEY introduced the following Resolution:

_____________________________

RESOLUTION

Resolved, that George Walker Bush, President of the United States, is impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors, and that the following Articles of Impeachment be exhibited to the United States Senate: Articles of Impeachment exhibited by the House of Representatives of the United States of America in the name of itself and of all the people of the United States of America, against George Walker Bush, President of the United States of America, and other officials, in maintenance and support of its impeachment against him for high crimes and misdemeanors.



Be it resolved by the House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled that:



ARTICLE I. FAILURE TO PRESERVE, PROTECT AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION



In violation of the oath of office, which reads: “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States,” George Walker Bush, in his conduct while President of the United States has demonstrated a pattern of abuse of office and of executive privilege, and disregard for the Constitution itself. This conduct includes the following:



Manipulating Intelligence and Lying to Justify War.

In violation of the separation of powers under the Constitution and his subsequent obligation to share intelligence with the Congress, George Walker Bush, while serving as President of the United States of America, in preparing the invasion of Iraq, did withhold intelligence from the Congress, by refusing to provide Congress with the full intelligence picture that he was being given, by redacting information by, for example, removing portions of reports such as the August 6, 2001 Presidential Daily Brief, and actively manipulating the intelligence on Iraq’s alleged weapons programs by pressuring the Central Intelligence Agency and other intelligence agencies to provide intelligence such that “the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy” as revealed in the “Downing Street Memo.”



To this end, President George Walker Bush and Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld created the Office of Special Plans inside the Pentagon to override existing intelligence reports by providing unreliable evidence that supported the claim that Iraq’s alleged weapons of mass destruction posed an imminent threat to the United States of America. By justifying the invasion of Iraq with false and misleading statements linking Iraq to the attacks of September 11, 2001, and falsely asserting that Iraq had a nuclear weapons program for which it was importing aluminum tubes and uranium, these assertions being either false, or based on “fixed” intelligence, with the intent to misinform the people and their representatives in Congress in order to gain their support for invading Iraq, denying both the people and their representatives in Congress the right to make an informed choice, George Walker Bush, President of the United States, did commit and was guilty of high crimes against the United States of America.



ARTICLE II. ABUSE OF OFFICE AND OF 3 EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE.



In violation of his oath to “faithfully execute the office of President of the United States,” George Walker Bush, in his conduct while President of the United States, has consistently demonstrated disregard for that oath by obstructing and hindering the work of Congressional investigative bodies and by seeking to expand the scope of the powers of his office. This conduct includes the following:



Failure to Uphold Accountability.

In abrogation of his responsibility under the oath of officeto take care that the Laws be faithfully executed, by which he agreed to act in good faith and accept responsibility for the overall conduct of the Executive Branch, a duty vested in his office alone under the Constitution, George Walker Bush, failed to take responsibility for, investigate or discipline those responsible for an ongoing pattern of negligence, incompetence and malfeasance to the detriment of the American people.



Those whom George Walker Bush, as President of the 23 United States of America, has failed to hold to account include but are not limited to the following top-level officials in his administration:



(a) Richard Cheney. In violation of his oath of office to support and defend the Constitution, Richard Cheney, Vice President of the United States of America, played a key role in manipulating intelligence in the interest of promoting the illegal invasion of Iraq by pressuring analysts at the Central Intelligence Agency to “fix” their intelligence estimates of the danger posed by Iraq in relation to weapons of mass destruction, whereby Richard Cheney, Vice President of the United States, did commit and was guilty of high crimes against the United States of America.



(b) Condoleezza Rice, In violation of her Constitutional duty to share and provide accurate and truthful intelligence information with the Congress, as former National Security Advisor to the President, did play a leading role in deceiving Congress and the American public by repeating and propagating false statements concerning Iraq’s alleged weapons of mass destruction program, including false information that the purchase of aluminum tubes demonstrated that Iraq was pursuing a nuclear weapons program, false information that Iraq was seeking to purchase uranium and false information that Iraq sought help in developing a chemical and biological weapons program; whereby Conoleezza Rice, Secretary of State of the United States of America, did commit and was guilty of high misdemeanors against the United States of America.



By neglecting to superintend the conduct of these officials and to hold members of the Executive Branch responsible for their negligence or violations of law, George Walker Bush, President of the United States, did commit and was guilty of high misdemeanors against the United States of America.



Wherefore, by their aforementioned conduct, George Walker Bush, Richard Cheney and Condoleezza Rice warrant impeachment, trial and removal from office.



ARTICLE III. FAILURE TO ENSURE THE LAWS ARE FAITHFULLY EXECUTED



In violation of his duty under Article II, Section 3 of the Constitution of the United States of America to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed,” George Walker Bush, during his tenure as President of the United States, has violated the letter and spirit of laws and rules of criminal procedure used by civilian and military courts, and has violated or ignored regulatory codes and practices that carry out the law.



This conduct includes the following:



Illegal Domestic Spying.

In violation of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) [50 USC Chapter 36], George Walker Bush did clandestinely direct the National Security Agency and various other intelligence agencies, in secret and outside the lawful scope of their mandates, for purposes unrelated to any lawful function of his offices, to conduct electronic surveillance of citizens of the United States on U.S. soil without seeking to obtain, before or after, a judicial warrant, thereby subverting the powers of the Congress and the Judiciary by circumventing the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) courts established by Congress, whose express purpose is to check such abuses of executive power, provoking the presiding judge of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to file a complaint and another judge to resign in protest, the said program having been subsequently ruled illegal (ACLU vs. NSA); he has also concealed the existence of this unlawful program of spying on American citizens from the people and all but a few of their representatives in Congress, even resorting to outright public deceit as on 20 April, 2004, when he told an audience in Buffalo, New York: “any time you hear the United States government talking about wiretap, it requires . . . a court order. Nothing has changed, by the way. When we're talking about chasing down terrorists, we're talking about getting a court order before we do so,” whereby said George Walker Bush, President of the United States, did commit and was guilty of high crimes against the United States of America.



In all of this, George Walker Bush has repeatedly and unapologetically misled the American people and has sought to undermine the system of checks and balances established by the Founding Founders. Wherefore George Walker Bush, by such conduct, and in the interest of saving our Constitution and our democracy from the threat of arbitrary government, warrants impeachment and trial, and removal from office.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...