Is this What american allies and american funded governments are like?

Question

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7690490.stm

The link above just mentions the wave of war crimes in columbia, it is only the tip of an iceberg.Also just recently a massive mass grave was found in columbia where the bodies of over 20.000 people were found, hands tied behind thier backs and shot.Another mass mass grave just discovered in South korea where the remains of over 200,000 people have been found,the people found there too had thier hands tied behind thier backs and shot,the people were murdered by the americans and south koreans in the korean war, and they had kept the location of this massive mass grave quiet.Proves who the nazis realy are.

Answer 1

The developed, post-industrial nations of the world "require" resources from the rest of the world--natural resources, labor resources, and strategic resources. Most in recent history have espoused a moral standing over international affairs. For instance, the USSR claimed it supported humanistic, worker centric egalitarianism, and the USA claimed it supported democratic, human rights focused reforms.



Despite these claims, most, if not all, of the "great powers" follow what is known as realpolitik, a German political science term that means a view of international politics emphasizing national self-interest. In other words, all nations inherently act in ways to increase their own power, and therefore, all nations must act in this way, lest a competitor take power and opportunity for itself at the expense of others.



Nations do not view their actions as either moral or immoral, but rather "amoral," or morality simply does not apply. In the examples provided in the question, it is not so much that the United States views its policy as supporting ruthless dictators and regimes in South America or the Middle East, but rather that it supports whatever situation will supposedly provide easiest access to resources the United States wants.



The pendulum swings the other way, as well. For instance, post-war Germany and Japan received much support from the United States in forming new regimes and rebuilding, and now, both live up to high standards of human rights and democracy. Still, this is not completely out of high ethical standards, but rather as a way to create bulwarks against Soviet and Chinese ascendancy.



The spectrum of governments that have received or are receiving US support covers the entire range from the best to the worst. In nearly all cases, the things that tie them all together are political, material, and strategic gain for the United States. Unfortunately, this is the truth behind virtually every "great power" in history. It is not a question only the United States has to ponder, but, indeed, the entire community of nations.

Answer 2

Is this What american allies and american funded governments are like? (Answer is Yes, 11 killed by Columbian Army)

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/america...

The link above just mentions the wave of war crimes in columbia,...

But Then You go on to State...

"Also just recently a massive mass grave was found in columbia where the bodies of over 20.000 people were found, hands tied behind thier backs and shot.Another mass mass grave just discovered in South korea where the remains of over 200,000 people have been found,the people found there too had thier hands tied behind thier backs and shot,the people were murdered by the americans and south koreans in the korean war, and they had kept the location of this massive mass grave quiet.Proves who the nazis realy are."



Well since the Nazi's believed in the Big Lie, it must be you who are the Nazi. Where is your BBC link for the Big Lie.

Answer 3

it is all hypocrisy, my buddy. And all that American double-universal that the U. S. be conscious to different countries. what variety of super judgment is it, that its mentioned as an act of conflict while different countries do it, and yet while the U. S. does a similar element, its not an act of conflict?. for the duration of the Soviet-Afghan conflict (1979-1989), the U. S. provided palms and funds to the Afghan mujahedeens (that risk-free the Taliban and the gang of Osama Bin weighted down) who have been battling against the Soviet troops on the time. isn't this an act of conflict?. for the duration of the Iran-Iraq conflict (1980-1988), the U. S. provided palms (that risk-free fighter aircrafts, floor-to-air missiles and chemical weapons) to Saddam Hussein, which he used against Iranian troops. isn't this an act of conflict?. for the duration of the Arab-Israeli conflict (Yom Kippur conflict, 1973), the U. S. provided aircrafts, missiles, and weapons to Israel. This US help for Israel made Saudi Arabia impose an oil-embargo that led to extreme gasoline rationing interior the U. S.. Wasn't this US action an act of conflict?. in case you keep an open strategies and evaluate what the Iranians are doing now and what the U. S. have been doing interior the previous, do you notice any distinction?. Now, take a closer examine out the information, then ask the question back to your self. And to the poster above me who's attempting to justify US previous movements by ability of pointing out that proposing palms to countries with a "status national military" isn't an act of conflict, nicely... his reasoning is warped and defies person-friendly experience. in case you bear in mind the "Iran-Contra Deal" of the late 80's, the place the U. S. offered weapons to Iran and use the money to finance the Contra rebels of Nicaragua. The Contras are rebels or insurgents (and not Nicaragua's status national military). And the extra severe certainty is that the U. S. offered weapons to Iran (which the U. S. had already earlier declared as a antagonistic usa and usa of america's sworn enemy). How could you justify such movements?.

Answer 4

Don't believe a word But seeing that the U K controlled Zimbabwe and south Africa and Iraq at one time just goes to show all what Nazis you are

The last thing I heard on your BBC was English troops were needed in the states to keep the yanks from killing the Indians and we didn't want to pay for it There well never be a fertilizer shortage in that part of the world I feel it's y'all biggest export

Y'all did invent the WC showing once again that necessity is the mother of invention

Answer 5

That could be one example; The Bushes and Bin Ladens were friends for over 20 years...

Answer 6

The BBC is one of the most respected reporting authorities in the world. They laugh at us for our media which allows us to completely ignore viewpoints we don't like.



I'm not anti-American, but I'm anti-American Ignorance.



Get out of your bubble, there's a whole world out there. Don't be shocked if someone doesn't agree with you once in a while.

Answer 7

If we want to play the history game,the British have a few of their own

atrocities to answer for. The British Empire wasn't all about peace and love,now was it?

Answer 8

Sounds like the type of government supported when the right retains control of our government, yes.

If you notice right-wingers are all about purges of liberal philosophy.



Do a little research on this guy:

http://www.nndb.com/people/813/000044681/

Answer 9

And you're actually trying to blame America for this? Ei yi yi. Honey, you need to rest more before you post questions, you're still recovering from your frontal lobotomy.

Answer 10

"Proves who the nazis realy are"



This gets my vote for logical leap of the year!

Answer 11

The BBC is anti-American.



If you read them regularly, you'd know that.