When Ken Starr started investigating sex, should Clinton have fired him?

Question

Ken Starr was hired to investigate Whitewater, but moved on to Monica.

Should Clinton have fired him at that point?

Answer 1

Only if Clinton switched to the Republican party first.

Answer 2

Yes, because anyone pleading the 5th is obviously guilty, right.........Flynn and Trump have said so countless times.



and then of course, asked for immunity and plead the 5th, .....



but hey, that's my American RIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



except when a democrat does it......then it means they're guilty as sh*t.



Ya gotta love all the blazing hypocrisy out of the right.

Answer 3

Bill Clinton was happy that Ken Starr backtracked and hired Monica Lewinsky instead of Ken Starr because it allowed Billy C to have an affair with Monica Lewinsky and have sex with her in 1998, leading to him using a cigar on her privates.

Answer 4

No, because through a circuitous route the two were related. When you start an investigation, you don't know where it ends up. Nixon was forced to resign not because of a botched burglary, but because of his paranoid missteps to cover it all up.



McDuck will find the same of course, probably faster because he enjoys randomly sharing evidence that's totally not favorable to him. His idiot son took three months off the investigation by pointing a smoking gun at his head. Clinton was far better at managing the whole Lewinsky nonsense, and it was totally nonsense. Every cheating husband lies about cheating. And as infuriating as it was, legally it did matter what the definition of "is" was. And he knew that, which is why he barely could keep from chuckling when he said it.