Question:
Should Federal Government Force States To Accommodate Sharia Law?
?
2011-01-07 05:18:42 UTC
Oklahoma voters do not have the right to ban Sharia law in their courts, thanks to liberal Federal Judge LaGrange.

Do liberals support the Federal government forcing states to adopt Sharia law?
Nine answers:
Johnny Conservative
2011-01-07 05:21:08 UTC
Absolutely NO.
?
2017-01-08 08:17:15 UTC
ok human beings, i'm an lawyer, an Oklahoman, a conservative, & a Christian - so the following is the interior song. a million. No, that's not purely something FOX ma de up. In very last Tuesday's election, Oklahoma exceeded a state constitutional modification pointing out that in undemanding words US guidelines would nicely be seen in Oklahoma courts. besides the actual shown reality that the modification reported Sharia regulation, it applies to all overseas guidelines. the former day, a federal decide in Oklahoma imposed a momentary injunction prohibiting enforcement of the regulation pending an finished listening to. 2. The case remains pending and has not been determined with the aid of a lengthy shot. 3. certain, we've a huge Islamic community in Oklahoma. It changed into really a form of who filed the lawsuit. 4. The federal courtroom has not mandated using Sharia regulation; it has purely reported that, contained in the right case, it may nicely be used. i'm not commenting on no matter if I agree or disagree; notwithstanding, i visit assert, that that's no diverse from what we ought to cope with purely about on a daily basis at the same time as it is composed of Indian (as in close by American) regulation. often times, the courtroom's jurisdiction and/or the regulation it ought to judge in Oklahoma is ruled with the aid of guidelines ruled with the aid of our relationship with different tribes. regularly those situations contain significant different and toddlers situations the position one member of the kin is close by American or company ventures in which a tribe is in contact. 5. more desirable than something, this would come right down to a state's rights question & it really is why such quite some Oklahomans are disillusioned, even those who voted antagonistic to the modification.
qncyguy21
2011-01-07 05:48:25 UTC
They don't have the right to ban it because of the US Constitution guaranteeing religious freedom, not because of a liberal federal judge.

Do you people not know anything about the country you pretend to love so much?



Sha'ria law is becoming more like American civil law but with a religious twist. It isn't staying the same as in ultra conservative nations where reactionaries fight us daily in order to prevent change.
anonymous
2011-01-07 05:37:55 UTC
that judge needs to be removed from the bench as the constitution specifically says that congress shall make no law regarding religion sharia law is supposedly a religion affiliated law. so it should be banned from all court houses
?
2011-01-07 05:27:43 UTC
No and they don't. Have you ever heard of people using arbitration and agreeing to abide by that decision. After that, the agreement is formalized in court. Happens all the the time. The state of OK can't pick and choose who you go to for arbitration.
anonymous
2011-01-07 05:32:01 UTC
Nobody saw that coming. It isn't like immigrants from the middle east haven't been warning people forever about Islam and Sharia law.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ox7OdSQxDO0
A Voice of Reason
2011-01-07 06:05:54 UTC
I don't think she ruled it unconstitutional. I think she just blocked it until a hearing can be held to test its constitutionality.
Mr. Wolf
2011-01-07 05:20:43 UTC
Due to the 1st Amendment we do not have to worry about that.
Pelosi's Stinky Pu ssy Cat
2011-01-07 05:25:54 UTC
no


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...