He is trying to rewrite history, or should I say he thinks that the American public is to dumb to understand that SS was marketed as an insurance policy for retirement.
The old saying History is written by the victor does NOT apply here, as Obama is not wearing the flag of a victor any longer, and he did not have any part of the start of Social Security.
But his base is so uninformed and so conditioned to believe that everything is an entitlement rather than a savings account.
SS is a sort of savings/insurance system and it had better NOT become "means tested"
For if it does we should all quit paying into it.
Means testing is a way to make SS only pay those who need the money.
But it was never designed as a welfare type retirement fund, it was a forced insurance policy for retirement regardless of necessity, and they have robbed it several times as a slush fund.
But that cannot, or lets say cannot ethically call it something that should be means tested as in leading up to that idea through saying it is for Widows and Children.
Don't Means Test Social Security
http://politics.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2010/01/29/dont-means-test-social-security-lets-not-kill-the-golden-goose-.html
No "Means Testing" for Social Security
http://moneyandsuch.blogspot.com/2010/07/no-means-testing-for-social-security.html
James Clyburn Supports Means Testing for Social Security
http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2010/05/28/james-clyburn-supports-means-testing-for-social-security/