Is it wrong of me to "get my money's worth" from the Census?

Question

They sent me a letter telling me they werre sending me a letter. If I don't respond, they'll have to hire someone, train them, then send them to my house to get the answer (I'm only giving them one answer anyway, out of all the questions they're asking). If I'm not at home, or I don't give the answer the first, or second time, they'll have to keep sending someone out.

So, by not answering, I'm creating or saving a job.

Is NOT answering the census the most patriotic thing we could do right now?

Answer 1

Nope! I am going to do that too! Then I will tell the Census worker to f**k off!

Answer 2

I understand your point, but let's not waste any more of our money than the Democrats and Obama already have. I'm still supremely ticked off at that idiotic $2.5 million Super Bowl commercial.



As to the census being Constitutionally required, that's correct But the purpose of a census is to count people in each district. That's it. Other than that, they have no right to any further information. I'll check the questions and will answer those that I believe are pertinent.



By the way, I worked as a county census taker in Virginia back in 1980. Had more than one gun pointed at me and more than a few doors slammed in my face. Back then, we HAD to go door to door. There was no 'voluntary mailer'. But then, I could pretty much answer most of the questions for the person I was 'counting'. Not so much any more.

Answer 3

If the Census are going to spend the money anyway, you aren't saving anybody one freaking nickel. You can't hide from the government. As far as I'm concerned, running from the Census Bureau is cowardice.



They sent you a letter proving your mailing address is still valid. The Post Office would have rejected the letter if the address was bad.

Answer 4

it truly is an somewhat thrilling topic it really is been debated because the previous due 1800's. initially, it grow to be many times theory that money grow to be traded for ability and time with the intention to purchase what grow to be had to live to inform the tale then human beings began to acquire more desirable than they had to live to inform the tale and could purchase "luxuries" that weren't needed for survival. Now, it style of feels that we compete for and hoard money for money's sake. money has lost it truly is connection to the "stuff" which may be bought with it. So, relying on which philosophy someone holds, sure, there's a level the position the quantity of money someone has is adequate and previous that aspect is "more desirable than adequate". there is yet another, a lot larger, problem with the buildup of more desirable money than someone needs for survival or for "luxuries". those with huge quantities of money to make investments who favor to make more desirable money with it create the ambience necessary for the style of "imaginitive" investments and mass hypothesis that destabilize the monetary gadget. also, as money passes into fewer and a lot less palms, get entry to, impression and ability bypass into those similar palms. this can nicely be achieveable to the concept of representative democratic authorities in which ability is residing with the human beings as an entire and by no skill interior the few. there's a reason that one and all human societies have had and proceed to have mechanisms which promote the stream of wealth for the time of society.

Answer 5

Statistical analysis of the 2000 census indicated that the pre-census letter and post-census postcard increased the number of people who mailed their forms back in by 6 points, to 67 percent



For every percentage point of households that mail their forms back in, the Census Bureau estimates it saves $85 million, thanks to not having to send people to their door to record their information.



Edwards said census workers will visit a home up to six times in the two to three months they are going door-to-door before giving up, and the average cost to gain the information from each household that does not send in its forms is an extraordinary $57.



http://www.the-dispatch.com/article/20100315/ARTICLES/3154006/1010/LIVING02?p=2&tc=pg



So your money's worth of the census pre-mailing letter was 44 cents and you will cost the government $56.56 more by not sending back the census. If you complain about government spending, don't do your part to make them spend over 13000% more for your census.

Answer 6

LOL



So you're a patriot for breaking constitutional law?



Let's go over this one more time. You are actually arguing that it is our PATRIOTIC duty to ignore the constitution.



LOL



Article 1 Sec 2 states: "Enumeration shall be made within three Years after the first Meeting of the Congress of the United States, and within every subsequent Term of ten Years, in such Manner as they shall by Law direct."



The current law that directs the census is Article 13 of the US Code.

Answer 7

Yes, it is wrong. Fill it out and send it in, took me about three minutes.



Brian - I read an article about that letter, cost us taxpayers $40 million for something we were already aware of.

Answer 8

NO ... your state gets money based on the census and your number of Representatives sent to Washington DC are based on the Census.

Answer 9

I wonder how many of these people that claim you are sidestepping the Constitution are concerned about the obvious violation of the Tenth Amendment the health care bill is trying to do. I'll have a lot more respect for that argument if the Supreme Court kicks it out. Meanwhile, most of congress obviously does not care about the Constitution now-why bug us little people about it? Did *we* take an oath to defend it? All we are guilty of is being born here.

Answer 10

I would prefer you answer promptly but I do wonder how much was wasted on the first letter telling you that you would be getting another letter soon..

Answer 11

The US Constitution declares there shall be a census every 10 years. Why you believe it is patriotic to directly subvert the constitution, is beyond me.

Answer 12

Yeah, but some of those census takers you don't want coming to your door.

Answer 13

I dont get what your problem with a census is?

Answer 14

Your next question will be bitching about government spending.

Answer 15

For a member of ACORN under a new title.

Don't let them in your house. They will be casing it.



Census is now a tool to promote racism, not simply count the people.

Answer 16

WHAT ARE YOU HIDING????