?
2015-01-17 09:45:58 UTC
These critics quickly point out that tax dollars must pay for the classes, yet they ignore the investment.
The majority of people go to school because they realize it is an investment in their future. There are significant up-front costs, but over the long run an education leads to higher salaries and more stable jobs.
Yet cons ignore this. Why? Are they simply unable to grasp this concept? Or perhaps their knee-jerk opposition to Obama clouds their judgment?
Taxpayers directly benefit from this. First - taxpayers themselves will be able to attend community college (if they choose). Second - an educated society spurs innovation and leads to less social spending.
Why are conservatives anti-investment?