Question:
How come the 2008 and 2012 elections are not controversial 21st century elections but 2000 and 2016 are?
2018-04-01 22:16:09 UTC
Libertards literally consider every election why not Democrat losers controversial automatically.
Five answers:
Vincent G
2018-04-01 22:33:24 UTC
In 2008 and 2012, the winner actually had the most votes.
Mike
2018-04-02 00:22:03 UTC
2000 Candidate that won the popular vote IS NOT PRESIDENT...Gore lost

2016 Candidate that won the popular vote IS NOT PRESIDENT...Hillary lost



Liberals BLAME the Electoral College when the wisdom of the founders does not give them the results they want.
?
2018-04-01 22:26:02 UTC
You forgot 2004.
mustagme
2018-04-01 22:22:27 UTC
There were massive amounts of voter fraud and intimidation during those years.
2018-04-01 22:18:14 UTC
It's racist to point out that an illegal alien was elected President in 2008 and 12.


ⓘ
This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...