First of all, you're not even comparing numbers from the same time period, the GDP growth numbers were from Q1 2014 (Jan, Feb, Mar). Today's jobs numbers were from April, and indicate, to some extent, an improving economy, after a disappointing winter.
Secondly, yes, GDP growth is an overall, general measure of the growth rate of the economy, and economic indicators tend to move, to some degree, in sync, but they don't always, and there's not a direct link between GDP and employment. When one rises or falls the other tends to as well, but it's not assured. The economy is a complex beast, and economic indicators sometimes move in opposite directions.
The US adding 200,000 jobs per month is not unfeasible, nor is it particularly dramatic, given the size of our economy and workforce. It's not inconsistent with a modest growth in GDP.
Finally, all these indicators that you are referring to are statistical estimates. There is noise and innacurracy in any data set. They don't count one-by-one every job created or every transaction in the economy, they survey, estimate, and project. They're subject to revision, sometimes significantly so. That doesn't mean they're "false" it means they're statistics, not counts.
So, yes, the economic numbers released recently are a mixed bag. Some indicators are positive, others less so. All in all, they suggest an economy that's moving ahead in fits and starts, with some bright spots, yet a long way to go. They suggest we had a tough winter economically, but that initial indications are that things may be improving. But you can't read too much into one month's numbers.