When is the US government going to approve a highspeed rail linking east coast to west coast?

Question

Wouldn't this help our oil dependancy?

Wouldn't this give an alternative to people who dont wanna fly?

Wouldn't this boost the economy?

Wouldn't this mean people getting to and fro work way faster?

Wouldn't this mean that we have an alternative in transport?

Wouldn't this mean better integration?

Answer 1

Because of the distance that you can travel in the US I cannot see many people leaving airline travel to go from the west to east coast, remember the planes travel at 400 to 450 mph and the fastest trains go around 190 to 250 mph.



I think the person who replied that high speed train travel is a waste of time is a fool he has probably never travelled this way in Europe and the UK it works fine but the distance is shorter than the US and Europeans are used to train travel not many americans are

Answer 2

Rail travel in the United States is a different issue compared with densely populated countries like Japan or Britain.

3000 miles of track at an average speed of 150 mph would take 20 hrs to get from coast to coast and this would only cover a very small percentage of the population. A comprehensive system of branch lines to feed the main line would be a huge undertaking.

Unfortunately it would do little to reduce the large amount of energy spent on driving and flying. Flying is quite an efficient means of transport - less than 4 litres of fuel per 100 passenger km according to KLM for a full flight or about 1 US gallon per 60 passenger miles. It would be more effective to improve the high fuel consumption of many US cars.

Answer 3

Also it would increase economic activity along the route



Housing, shops, sports venues, industrial parks There would be a whole lot of activity going on that would be connected with a high-speed rail line.



Only the government can handle the infrastructure at first, because private money cant afford it, but once it's get's going sell it to the private sector



Everybody wins.

Answer 4

When all the airplanes fall out of the sky. Then people will travel by car and bus. Trains are for freight.

Answer 5

do no longer carry your breath. initially, in the previous any national severe velocity rail community could desire to be geared up, smaller close by networks might could desire to be time-honored. they might connect rather close by city factors with severe site visitors quantity (e.g. lines connecting the enormous cities of the northeast, different lines via California and the enormous southwestern cities, and so on.) construction those lines will take billions of greenbacks and a variety of of alternative years. in basic terms after this became into finished might all people evaluate increasing the connections to a countrywide point. yet extra importantly, i in my view do no longer think of it quite is going to ever make experience to construct a countrywide community. Even the utmost velocity trains are plenty slower than jets. for numerous reasons, there's a decrease to how briskly all people will ever could desire to make a practice pass - we are already coming near that decrease. So if the quickest trains in basic terms finally end up going 500-six hundred km/h (that's plenty swifter than cutting-edge trains in provider, and doubtless swifter than will ever be put in provider), you're taking double the time to commute enormous distances as you will possibly in a jet. no person in all their actual innovations might commute this way go-united states. further to that's the low inhabitants density west of the Mississippi river. Trains require severe density to make financial experience, so it quite is doubtful that there might ever be plenty tension to construct a severe velocity line able like Kansas. Now your particular questions: -help oil dependency? relies upon, yet usually, any mass transport decision can tend to shrink oil dependence because of the fact it quite is extra efficient than having a lot of vehicles on the line. -decision to non-fliers? particular, yet in basic terms for shorter distances (2-3h holiday), as i've got defined above. -improve financial device? particular, IF geared up in factors that choose it. in any different case, it quite is merely the thank you to blow public funds. -speedy commuting? particular.

Answer 6

1848

Answer 7

We don't need the government to tell us where to spend our money. There is no need for high speed rail projects.

Answer 8

Hopefully never. High speed rail is a waste of money

Answer 9

Never.

No

Yes

No

No

Yes

No

Answer 10

Hopefully never.



Beaver is that you?

Answer 11

no,to all of your answers

Answer 12

NEVER, if Cons have their way.