How come Obama shuts down the Jobs Council, yet his Job Czar Jeffy Immelt managed to send jobs to China?

Question

GE CEO Jeffrey Immelt, The Head Of Obama’s Jobs Council, Is Moving Jobs And Economic Infrastructure To China At A Blistering Pace

Apparently, this is all part of a "plan to invest about $2 billion across China" over the next few years. But moving core pieces of its business overseas is nothing new for GE. Under Immelt, GE has shipped tens of thousands of good jobs out of the United States. Perhaps GE should change its slogan to "Imagination At Work (In China)". If the very people that have been entrusted with solving the unemployment crisis are shipping jobs out of the country, what hope is there that things are going to turn around any time soon?

http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/ge-ceo-jeffrey-immelt-the-head-of-obamas-jobs-council-is-moving-jobs-and-economic-infrastructure-to-china-at-a-blistering-pace

Answer 1

Why would any one expect any less?



It doesn't surprise me at all that the minions of socialism who complained about 5.5% unemployment during the Bush years now could seem to careless now that Obama is doing nothing to promote jobs at 7.8% after four years of promising to get it under 4%. It also seems that the nationalist media has taken the spotlight off it and thrown a shroud over this issue altogether. Bring in the next shiny object: "guns" "gay marriage" "Palin" "Beyonce" etc.



The more and more you learn about them, the more and more progressives are exposed as simply useful idiots to the latest incarnation of National Socialism.

Answer 2

merely step exterior your political self for a minute and splendor this question. Can a President extremely have an considerable effect on activity creation? The political events say they'll create jobs however the inner maximum sector for the main area employs us all. the place is the flexibility for a President then to extremely exchange inner maximum companies habit and cause them to hire people? (Taxes is with regard to the only way it and that takes time and an act of Congress) If a individual with a organization would not like the outlook they gained't hire could you? even however this sitting President, like numerous sitting President gets blamed for the financial gadget he extremely have little or no interior the way of controlling it. The expenditures of pastime are close to 0, tarp the two saved us or destroyed us counting on the type you seem at it, quantitative easing thank you for the inflation, yet all designed to game the gadget to no avail he has performed the only element he can as we talk do, throw money on the subject the place did that get him? Tea occasion backlash is approximately all. it is user-friendly to deconstruct an element greater good to layout it and placed it at the same time. which skill blame is user-friendly factor the finger how approximately we try to sparkling up the subject an user-friendly question what can we as a people going to do? it remains a Democracy, a representative one by using the flexibility flows from the people does it no longer, he's an extension people on the 2nd it is our government. in this present day era this President or any sitting President is a sitting duck for deconstruction. you obtain to guard the quarterback..............till the instructor takes him out.

Answer 3

Corporations may be people, but they're not Americans. GE is a global entity with loyalty to no one, and they're going to invest where they see the greatest return.



Jeffrey Immelt may have been a poor choice to serve on the Jobs Council.

Answer 4

FYI GE is a company, not the government. Capitalism at its finest!

Answer 5

Sounds like you are against capitalism.

Answer 6

He did it to annoy you.