Why do people refuse to acknowledge the significance in Hillary’s use of a private email server?

Question

When Comey possessed conclusive evidence that Hillary Clinton intentionally used a private email server he choked and people praised him for his lack of action. Now that metadata on Huma’s computer was found to be linked to Hillary’s private email server the FBI has reopened their case, people are up in arms because they are convinced there is a conspiracy.

My questions are:

1. Why do people choose to ignore the significance of Hillary’s intentional and illegal use of a private email server?
2. How can anyone vote for an existing government official, who carelessly opted to put your life in danger?

I am interested in hearing your perspective.

Answer 1

We've known for a long time she used a private server, that wasn't illegal then. If it had been it would have been simple to bring a case and win. She even said she did.

The emails on Huma's laptop were not of classified materials.

The FBI closed the case, again, the day before the election.

Answer 2

1. Use of a private email server is not "illegal".

2. SecState predecessors Condi Rice and Colin Powell both used private email servers and advised Clinton to do the same. They are not under investigation because they are Republican's.

3. There is ZERO evidence Mrs. Clinton's private email server put anyone's life in danger. That is sky-high hyperbole.



Please revise your premise using actual facts and try again.

Answer 3

Putin has a private server too

So does Assange



Admit Trumps hypocrisy first

Answer 4

Because there is no evidence of any crime. The investigation is over, and there is no evidence of any crime, the server was not illegal. . Also, the Benghazi investigation is over, also with no evidence of any crime.



This is a dead horse. The election is over. Time for people like you to get a hobby.

Answer 5

People have placed way too much significance on it. There is no evidence that her server was breached and was up to date on all the security patches.



The law she "broke" was not criminal and had no punishment attached, so to call it "illegal" is a stretch of the definition of that word.

Answer 6

Because morons like Cantankerous exist. They only believe what they are spoon fed by Clintons.

Answer 7

Only the democrat faithful refuse to do that.

Answer 8

emails were real