Does it seem like the Democrat presidents & candidates are more physically attractive than the repubs?

Question

John Edwards, Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, John Kennedy, Jimmy Carter,

compared to
reagan, bush, the other bush, eisenhower, john mccain

Answer 1

The things liberals focus on just blows my mind...



No wonder Obama was elected.

Answer 2

All of Bush's distant places coverage judgements have been an unmitigated catastrophe for this us of a and the international. None of those terrible acts could have been executed by skill of any of the applicants. in spite of if is is putting bases and hobnobbing with dictators interior the former Soviet Union, to leaving at the back of the Geneva and Kyto and Anti-ballistic treaties to ignoring Bin encumbered which extra approximately 9-11, to the comprehensive failure to any non violent relatives interior the middle East, the withdrawal of Syria from Lebanon, the merchandising of nuclear technologies for Mangos in India, for doing no longer something on commerce with China. yet by skill of a ways, the homicide of million Iraqis is quite the superb of Bush blunders and one that marks him as between the worst presidents interior the historic previous of our us of a. all the applicants will pull out troops. some applicants elect to pass away some troops in, inspite of the undeniable fact that it can be a small tension. Biden's physique of concepts for federalism is now looking like the only real looking answer. not one of the Democrats will initiate a war with Iran. on the different hand, Bush is for invading Iran. He won't, by using fact he realizes he's purely too inept and has lost all his political help. He has no military experience, no physique of concepts, no diplomatic skills or wisdom of the folk or historic previous of the region. he's an utter failure on his very own words, and the folk of the middle East hate him and could in no way enable him or his surrogates to rule.

Answer 3

Definitely, kinda funny you pointed it out... of course, Mitt Romney was a classicly good looking guy.. Giuliani is no stunner though... mmm I dunno, yeah as a whole Democratic major politicians are a bit younger, stronger, and more handsome lately... Palin was the hottest though :D (too bad she'd be a horrible VP, wouldn't mind seeing her on tv all the time)



*Edit* you didn't say Presidential candidates, you said "candidates"

Answer 4

I'm not bowled over by any of them, to be honest. I don't think one of them is handsome.



I don't think Obama's ugly, but he's no Omar Epps (OK, so I have a thing for Omar Epps! Sue me!). In fact he looks like a cousin of mine who I don't really like.



I don't find a single one you named attractive. But now I'm curious because there are a lot of past presidents whose looks I'm not acquainted with. I'll have to check 'em out.

Answer 5

Thats because republicans are generally older. Not everyone, but a lot of them are because they have accumulated more money and most tend to get a little more conservative as they get older. Older=not as attractive. It's a logical reason.



I knew that everyone would bring up sarah palin, she is ONE good looking republican politician.. anyone else?

Answer 6

So...you troll around the internet all day, naked in front of the computer to see which of the presidents will give you a rise ?





Have you considered admitting yourself to a psych ward?

Answer 7

Why did you leave out Sarah Palin? And besides you don't run a nation on looks as many of you examples prove.

Answer 8

Kennedy is the only cute one there, but yes I agree!

Answer 9

And yet the very best looking person this year was Republican Sarah Palin. Hands down the greatest looking candidate of all time.

Answer 10

Hmm. is that why Dems cheat?

But what about Hillary(woof) and Palin(hottie)

Answer 11

PLEASE TELL ME YOU ARE KIDDING?!



"Slick Willy" CLINTON???? "Jimmy Peanut" CARTER???? "Barry Elephant-Ears" OBAMA??? LMAO!!!!