Would Government Health Care for women would be just like this?

Question

NEW YORK -- For many women, getting a mammogram is already one of life's more stressful experiences.

Now, women in their 40s have the added anxiety of trying to figure out if they should even be getting one at all.

A government task force said Monday that most women don't need mammograms in their 40s and should get one every two years starting at 50 -- a stunning reversal and a break with the American Cancer Society's long-standing position. What's more, the panel said breast self-exams do no good, and women shouldn't be taught to do them.

http://www.kmbc.com/health/21636030/detail.html

"I have two young children," said Amber Smart, a 47-year-old mother in Agoura Hills, Calif. "There's a lot of years left that they need me." She's been having mammograms every six months, since she was 44, to make sure that certain dense areas of her breasts aren't cancer.

"I think it's kind of sad that they're basically saying, 'We can't afford to pay for the few people who may have it in their 40s, so a few people are going to die,'" Smart said.

AH! The Governments politicians have many ways to spin. Maybe not today maybe not tomorrow but who will be directing what and when YOU have any Rights?

Answer 1

At 26 I was diagnosed with stage 3 breast cancer and had no warning symptoms so I would have died if I had to wait till 50 for a mammogram.

TO V2: Nope I am 31 now and get a mammogram every 6 months.

Answer 2

how unsurprising that the government cares so little about women's rights... I suppose "my body, my choice" doesn't apply to mammograms, then?

Answer 3

of direction no longer! that could desire to be the main ridiculous element ever invented! people might desire to take care of their damn self's! in case you incredibly necessary an abortion, you may arise with the money. Why ought to I might desire to offer my no longer undemanding earned funds to kill someones toddler?!

Answer 4

to little78....



But you waited until age 40, right?