Liberals,what is easier for you? Attacking Palin or Defending Obama?

Question

Liberals,what is easier for you? Attacking Palin or Defending Obama?

Answer 1

Whats really funny is that the Dems in here are all admitting that theyre attacking her and not debating her credibility.



EDIT to PRAGUE: Prove that she has no credibility...my guess is you cant.



Looks like I guessed right ; ) Prague is the typical Palin hater, offers no credible factual basis for his hatred whatsoever, simply claims she has no credibility without offering to debate the facts or offering to provide facts to support his accusation.

Answer 2

I don't feel that Obama needs defending. Look at where our economy was a year ago and look at where it is today. We as a nation are coming around. Bush dropped his fly and pissed on everything for 8 years, the smell is starting to fade slowly.



Palin doesn't need to be attacked, every time she opens her mouth she sprews out just how little she knows about politics and our government. Although Bush did the same thing and made it into office (without winning the popular vote).

Answer 3

Both.



Attacking Palin because she's an easy target and doesn't stick up for herself--is a favorite past time for some liberals.



Defending Obama from the likes of you is just the icing on the proverbial cake. We now that the right lies constantly about Obama and doesn't have any morals or ethics whatsoever.



Just fear and ignorance. Fear and ignorance...

Answer 4

/ The ONLY reason Obama didn't want Palin's daughter's pregnancy to be dwelt upon is because... Obama's mother was unwed, 17 years old, and pregnant with him in Nov. 1960. In Feb, '61 his mother wed his father, and in Aug. '61 Obama was born. The term thrown around by the Dem's was, "Trailer Trash" and that hit too close to home for Obama to take. Palin didn't dish on Obama's personal life, only his political. She is to tough for Obama or Biden to overtake, but she didn't cross the line (lucky for Obama).

Answer 5

The other thing I do is defend ideals that I believe in. I think that is more effective. Name calling just makes people look ignorant of the issues.



How clever does this look:

Conservative: Your health care plan is unconstitutional. The government does not and should not have that authority!"

Liberal: "Yeah well Sarah Palin is an idiot!"



Both sides do it and neither side looks good doing it.

Answer 6

Defending Obama. I don't worry about Palin, she is not smart enough to be a threat. The stuff I say is true when defending Obama, and half of the stuff republicans say about him are just insane.

Answer 7

This is indeed a wonderful question! Too bad you won't get an honest answer.





Mr NiceGuy^3 said:

"Obama can defend himself, he's a big boy."



Yeah, BO's idea of that is, sealing his records so no one can see them. I've called a 4 year old a big boy before too.

Answer 8

Obviously attacking Palin. All they have to do is repeat the long-proved lies the guy on their TV keeps feeding them or pretend they believe she actually said the things used in comedy sketches. (They aren't pretending, are they?)

Defending Obama is literally impossible.

Answer 9

Attacking you, Palin and Obama Haters :)

Answer 10

I would say it would have to be attacking Palin as there isn't anything Obama has done that can be legitimately defended.

Answer 11

The easiest is sitting back and watching the new Republican Party destroy itself. Nobody has to do anything, every time the majority of them open their mouths, it is some off the wall, paranoid, illogical whine. They are a disaster unto themselves!!!

Answer 12

Attacking Palin. Defending Obama is impossible.

Answer 13

Attacking is easier, Defending is harder, but attacking is more fun because you people just blow your tops when someone criticizes your beloved mother Theresa.

Answer 14

Neither; I go straight for the Conservative Republicans. Why f**k around with talking heads?

Answer 15

Dem's hate it when a common person has a voice. They believe only the elites should have a voice. Remember it was Dem's behind the Jim Crow laws in the south, and the 3/5ths rule only giving African Americans 3/5 a vote.

Answer 16

libs can't defend their messiah They are ashamed of electing such a loser and failure!!!!!!

Answer 17

Repeating dumb things Palin says and does is not attacking her.

Obama can defend himself, he's a big boy.

Answer 18

Liberals just wish they had cute women like Palin on their side, Lets face it , all they have to look at is Pelosi, Clinton , and feinstein, YUK.

Answer 19

attacking Palin is sooo much more fun!

Answer 20

Both. =)

Answer 21

Attacking Palin is so hilariously easy. Attack on, my friends.



If anyone thinks that Sarah Palin is qualified to run anything other than a beauty pagent, you need a huge dose of reality.





"Liberals just wish they had cute women like Palin on their side, Lets face it , all they have to look at is Pelosi, Clinton , and feinstein, YUK."





So that proves that republicans really are only sexist, bigoted pigs who don't care about anything but her looks. Political experience and intelligence really don't matter to you, do they? Why am I not surprised?

Answer 22

attacking Palin

why?

Because she's a threat to the Democratic Party

she's a fresh new face that can actually be related to by citizens

and the liberals and liberal media know it

Answer 23

lol it is easy for them to think up smut. but terrible hard to find anything good Barry has done.

Answer 24

I hate liberals......im a conservative not a republicrat........altho republicans r better then democrats....