Third largest religion of the world and no land of our own. How does it feel ?

Question

Third largest religion of the world and no land of our own. How does it feel ?

Answer 1

Some americans have commented that religion doesnt matter! I only got one thing to say, "Look who's talking!". America is perhaps the biggest liar in this regard because they possibly involve religion in every thing. Be it the obama's swearing in ceremony or movies. In movies, they are always made portraying missionaries as saviours, god sent messengers. Walk the streets of india and you'll come to know what kind of saviours we are dealing with.



The best example of american missionary movement is perhaps the american (Couldnt find his name) who got arrested for terrorist attacks in india but apparently it was later discovered that his computer was hacked by islamists. He was arrested but later it was also discovered that he ran a cult christian agency involved in conversion business. Even when he had orders not to leave the country-officially, he was let off-unofficially by sonia!



He is now comfortably sitting on his couch in america. Mind you, this guy was a normal michael or john kind of character who worked 9 hrs in a company. Imagine, how many of them like him are already roaming the god damn streets.. Vampires.. Hooligan missionaries..

Answer 2

So i presume you say you are hindu and lament at not having a seperate land of your own.

My answer is we hindus are by nature innocent and have never looked to conquer others territory. The gay brahmins have filled people with fear about papa and bad karma catching up. So our heroes have all been tame when it came to occupying newly conquered territories.



(Be it Lord Rama installing Vibhishana in Lanka or Indira Gandhi gifting unworthy bangladeshis freedom,



BTW have a look at my question about congress and you will know what a meek surrender we hindus have done:

https://answersrip.com/question/index?qid=20090512222456AAjNqpV )

Answer 3

Although I am also hindu, but sorry to say that Hindu's cant escape of the real answers that the present situation is built by themselves only.



Hindus are tolerant, innocent.....so on rubbish.

Fact is that Hindu's do not have enough enough power or sense to protect themseleves, other wise there was no reason of such questions on net. Have you seen such debates for Muslims or any other religion on net....



Hindu in India is a middle class man who spent his whole life, in earning, providing living to his family and die in calmn.

Answer 4

You mean India.

Answer 5

HINDU NATION FREE FROM MENACE OF ISLAM IS BIRTH RIGHT OF EVERY HINDU



I STATE WE HINDUS ARE STILL SLAVES OF BRITISH FOUNDED MUSLIM MINDED CONGRESS

FOR MR K

I THINK U R A MUSLIM

HAVE U READ UR HISTORY

U PEOPLE ARE NOT EVEN LOYAL TO UR FATHERS AND MOTHERS

THERE WERE SEVERAL CASES WHEN SON MURDERED HIS FATHER OR FATHER MURDERED SON FOR SELFISH REASONS

U R NOT COMPETENT TO TALK ABOUT BRAHMINS WHO HAVE A GLORIOUS PAST SINCE PARSHU RAM DAYS

BRAHMINS ARE WARRIORS, POLICE MEN

THEY EVEN TAUGHT KHASHATRIYAS

FOR UR INFO

SIKHS AND HINDU S ARE SAME & SHARE COMMON CULTURE AND DONT NEED A MUSLIM MIND FOR INTEPRETATION

I AM SURPRISED TO KNOW THAT MANMOHAN SINGH THE PM OF INDIA FOR TWO TERMS IS NOT TREATING HIS FELLOW SIKHS WELL

Answer 6

there are 2 pauli kam guys side by side - V reincarnated ( probably got blocked because of his senseless statements about Brahmins ) and Steelboy ( A Khalistani Sikh whose bum probably was taken by a Brahmin - so he hates Brahmins )



Look what V has to say - .............i live by my katana, you are welcome to challenge! The only price is death for the loser! I live by the sword and honour death in battle! That is the Brahmin way! ...........................HO HO HO HO - Internet warrior !!!



One thing is for sure, India with all its diversity is a ready made circus. Why do you want a boring one religion country ?

Answer 7

your question is not very encouraging for a unified india.i agree with rang de instead because he seems to be targeting the culprits rather than targeting all people.i am a true follower of christ and i have seen evil things committed by the church members.they have destroyed the message of christ.conversion for them has become a trade.i hate people of god not the god.

Answer 8

ASK this question to th BJP...

"At our office-bearers meeting two days back, two eminent colleagues of ours affirmed their faith in Hindutva but cautioned against any narrow, bigoted, anti-Muslim interpretation being put on it," --senior BJP leader L K Advani.



His reference was to BJP leaders Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi and Shahnawaz Hussain who had contended even at the executive meeting that Gandhi's speech had cost the party dearly in the elections.



The political resolution adopted at the meet too sought to disagree with the contention of Gandhi, which has been derisively being referred by his detractors in the party as

"Pilibhit brand of Hindutva."



"Theocracy or any form of bigotry is alien to our ethos. Hinduism or, Hindutva is not to be understood or, construed narrowly confined only to religious practices or expressed in

extreme forms," the resolution said.

Answer 9

This is our land which is occupied. We are a people under seige.



@ EVERYBODY. Plz. dont fight among ourselves when our goal is same and enemy is common.



Have you all forgotten why Sikhism was created? How Gurus were persecuted by Mughal rulers?



@ Steelboy, have you forgotten Partition? Does not common suffering bring us together? Hindus and Sikhs have common grief and common injustice done to them in 1947.



@bmk, Ram installing Bibhishana in Lanka was a diplomatic step. It was not possible to rule Lanka from North India. It was not weakness by any means.



@V, BMK probably does not mean the Brahmin community by "gay". He means Gandhi who taught us to accept injustice without protest.



Hinduism has always justified violence in self-defence and to protest against injustice. There are lots of Brahmin kings in history who took to arms. No brahmins prevented Ram from attacking Lanka. Infact, brahmins did puja for success of kings' victory in wars.



There is no history of Mahatma Gandhi's so-called non-violence in Hindu scriptures & epics. Gandhi borrowed it from Budhhism and tried to pass it off as Hinduism.



Hinduism says: Those who accept injustice without protest are worse than those who do injustice.

Answer 10

correct me if I am wrong

but isn't Hinduism the dominate religion in India?

and since when does a religion have a right to

it's own nation/state?

Answer 11

Hindus in majority do not know how they happen to be Hindus. It is their connection with this land which gave them the name "Hindu". The people who are living in this land Bharat Varsha are all Hindus. Sikhs too. This is all due to minorities.



But the negligence and education under foreign influence is responsible for Hindus not aware of their identities. Now in future you will see more and more people of this land will claim they are allergic to the word Hindu. The mass conversions (shame on Government Inaction) and missionaries are also responsible for erosion of Hindu Culture.



All I can say is:



Hindu once was the largest common and most developed in the world and this land from Himalayas to Ocean floors was their land. The thought was even spread wide open across the globe.



And the fault is of Hindus of becoming weak, disunited and failing to keep the land under their influence. They failed in saving their brethren from being slaved by invading cultures who in reality are inferior.



So this Hindu nation became one secular plus two Islamic nations. The secular one is fighting to remain so but in near future you will see Hindus will not even have a secular land too. You all are doomed to be circumcised you coward race (under the influence of Gandhi), and for the sin you committed by worshiping the villains and forgetting the heroes.



And no one gives you a land. You have to keep your land. And if you think some land as Christian or Islamic, that land was not so 2000 years back and 1400 years back. They won that land and converted to Christian or Islamic Land.



Most conceited race of all races (can not confirm the supremacy of thier faith even in majority). Every hindu leader is running to Tantriks, Astrologers and Temples at the time of elections and then afterward becomes a secular. They are even betraying their idols.



I know one former INC MP (ex-minister) who when caught by CBI for keeping Rs. 4 Crore under the walls of his house. He organized an अनुष्ठान for saving him from Jail. and Pandits (I call them Butchers) recited mantras for him. And his national agenda is always to keep communal forces out of power. And Hindus voting for these cow-eaters. All of them are मलेच्छ in reality. They have no right to have their land.



And personally I want to be Hindu for every Incarnation of mine. Because this is the way and only true way. (though it is not taken by majority now).

Answer 12

Religions have a existence span, so Islam isn't around continuously, yet perhaps for a lengthy time. Islam could not win a coach down conflict between religions while you evaluate that's at evening an prolonged time in terms of technological information and technologies. the full Muslim international has only gained approximately 10 Nobel Prizes. Israel on my own has approximately 2 hundred recipients. whilst scientific concept is set loose, extra human beings will start to comprehend that religions are in line with myths somewhat than data. Then we'd have the means to keep away from all out conflict.

Answer 13

i agree with steelboy......sikhs demanded their own state because they were no being treated well...and for all those ignorant ppl out there who believe the hindus suffered as much as sikhs during the period when sikhs demanded their own state, they are incredibly retarded, and they lack knowledge of those events. Also, during the partition sikhs suffered a tremendous amount, I believe more than the hindus. I know that it is somewhat nonsensical to make that claim without providing reasoning or evidence, but really I am just too lazy to type up a complete argument. So, if you truly believe different to my statement than I invite you to do some unbiased research for yourself.



ahhaha that patriotic brahmin kid needs to calm down his views are much to insular. He should recalibrate his mindset on the history of Brahmins.

Answer 14

Until a few years ago, hindus had Nepal. People of Nepal tarnished it because of poor administration and corruption and what this question has any concern with Sikhs?



Can someone in a city say, because I am not married, others do not have right to marry?



Someone who wrote about Brahmans is right. Did not brahmans promote Moguel culture? They were the only among Hindus exempted of Zazia. What is their contribution in war of independence. Still India is a Hindu country where they killed thousands of Sikhs, Muslims, Christians but did not face any court of Law.



Hindu cities were declared holy when Sikhs demanded same status for Amritsar, their home was attacked on the martyrdom day of Guru Arjun. Only and only motive was to appease Hindu voters. Indira is considered as martyr for ordering the massacre of Sikhs. Every Language in India was given its due status but when Sikhs demanded similar status to Punjabi, thousands of them sent to jail and many were killed. Even after thousands of people's death(Both Hindus and Sikhs) Hindus oppose Punjabi langauge because Sikh scriptures are written in it even outside India. Every state in India got its capital except Punjab because majority of Sikhs live in Punjab. Sikhs sacrificed more than 70% of total people fought in war of Independence. How could they ask for a separate country? It was Hindus who provoked them. Even Jarnail Singh Bhindrawaley never demanded Khalistan. Anyway what is your concept of Hindu country? May be you thinking about BJP,s Raam Rajya in which all Shambooks(Dalits which include Sikhs, mulsims etc.) will be executed for worshiping and all the ladies will have to do agni prikisha.

Answer 15

It doesn't give any special feeling and is not an issue of any importance at all. The Sikhs were cracked down for their unrealistic demand.



By the way,



If



Nehru-Indira-Rajeev-Sonia-Rahul qualifies as a dynasty in Indian politics,



what disqualifies,



Nehru-Indira-Sanjay-Maneka-Varun



from being a dynasty?

Answer 16

Hardliners (from all communties) should demand a separate state for themselves..I want nothing with people who cannot be accomodating of other languages,castes,races and religions.I don't care for people who seek to tout their relevance by identifying themselves with any caste or religion...its LAME and RETARDED.No one can claim superiority over anyone just because they happen to belong to some caste.I just wish that Y!A is not a reflection of how indians in general really think....................i am appalled to say the very least.

Answer 17

India is our land and HINDU-RASTRA is not everything.If we want a separate state then from whom we will ask, or you mean that we should through away all minorities or make them a second class-citizen in India, as Hindus are in pakistan.

Typical RSS kind of hate ideology, and i do not support that.What I am of firm view that India should be guided by ONE COUNTRY -ONE LAW(which is above religion), and congress appeasement policies are against this.

Answer 18

Yes, we don't have a land of our own but i'm not going to take crap from some Dalit BMK who thinks Brahmins are "gay"! Being one of the tiniest minorities in India and being a Brahmin let me recount my family History. My Great Great Grand father was beheaded in a battle with Muslim armies. My Great grand father died protecting the lower castes of his village against islamic armies. My Grandfather died fighting the British for this nation, he was a communist revolutionary. My father went through partition, is a self made man who had to leave his family belongings in Pakistan. He lost is father when he was 2 years old and brought me up with values to work hard. Any idiot who feels they deserve better because their ancestors were apparently discriminated without ever participating in anything constructive for India can take a hike!

My family has shed blood for this country for thousands of years and i can say that because Punjabi Brahmins are not the regular brahmins who take charities but have fought for this country!

Anybody who thinks otherwise needs their family to work for this country for atleast 1400 years before they question my Brahmin commitment. We have picked up arms when required to defend the lame asses who sat on their hands when there were Islamic Invasions and today claim benefits for discrimination!

Anybody else think they deserve better, i live by my katana, you are welcome to challenge! The only price is death for the loser! I live by the sword and honour death in battle! That is the Brahmin way!



Edit: Oops, thats probably what your father said when he didn't withdraw in time and you are the "oops" result of that. You've been called that ever since. Go and bash some Khalistani Sikhs on the net becase in real life you pee your pants in front of them. Thats the only area you have an opinion on on the net. Gobind Singh was trained by a Rajput. Your Sikhs got their martial arts from the Rajputs and they got it like all Indian martial arts from the Brahmins. Go and research the origins of Kalari payat. It says Parshuram codified it, and surprise surprise he was a Brahmin who destroyed all corrupt Kshatriyas. Baudhayana was also a Brahmin who started the Shaolin temple in China.



Ram installed Vibhishana because he was Just and Dharmic unlike Ravana. It does not mean he was a stooge. If he was a stooge Sri Lanka would be a part of India. Vibhishana is given little credit by idiots who don't understand justice. He chose to side with good but he's made to look like a traitor.



@ Maitree BMK means exactly what he says. He is calling Brahmins gay when the shitpicker's ancestors never had any courage to fight themselves. BTW Gandhi was a Bania into Jainism, not a Brahmin. All the underachievers are jealous of Brahmins because they cannot compete with them when it is a level playing field. We are not here to babysit them either. Let the shitpickers fight their own battles. I hope some Islamist terrorist bombs some Buddhist temples in India so the shitpickers get a taste of their own medicine.

Answer 19

you dont ask for a nation when u have one..cuz then *that* would be greedy



btw stop talking crap

ur making it sound like ppl of different religions here are having problems with each other

Answer 20

We Hindus are tolerant people.We are not selfish and our religion teaches us to share everything with others.

Answer 21

us black folk still waitin fo a nation. get in line.