Question:
Is there a way to make the US healthcare system affordable?
?
2019-05-12 15:21:51 UTC
America has what is arguably the best healthcare system on the planet, and many would argue that creating a federally provided healthcare system allowing 'free' access would only corrupt that. But I doubt anyone could argue that the cost of US healthcare isn't positively overwhelming.

Is there any way to maintain the US's quality of care while bring the affordability to within reason for the majority of America's citizens?
85 answers:
anonymous
2019-05-15 01:17:20 UTC
Yeah eliminate the privitization of pills and medicine or severely restrict them both. Make the ailing American citizen a priority over the pharmaceutical manufacturer who just wants to put money in their pocket.



And number 2: Find a way to get in between the lies that pharmaceutical companies are paying politicians to spread to the American people.
anonymous
2019-05-14 14:49:55 UTC
Just experienced this



Husband has Humana for prescription coverage and mine is United something or other. We filled the exact same prescription under his plan and my plan and the cost was $62 out of pocket on Humana and $30 with United. Oh his is filled at CVS and mine at Walgreen



WHY such an outrageous difference? The pharmacy's reply "we made a better deal with the manufacturer than they did" oh yeah now I see.................duh.



There is a bit cheaper way if your family has a simple problem and that is "on call doctors" instead of taking every kid with a snotty nose to the ER. This on call service is approved by my health care providers and 35 per incident. I myself have used it on 2 occasions for a sinus infection and a bladder infection and each would have cost me over 150 (my insurance carrier) for each problem.



There are other options to the emergency room which is what runs our medical cost sky high for people who go there and never pay a dime.
anonymous
2019-05-13 19:41:43 UTC
Yes....return to a cash system and tax credits for ppl who use cash
anonymous
2019-05-13 18:23:54 UTC
‘Arguably the best healthcare system on the planet?’ Are you nuts? My bad, maybe you actually are and this is the result of psych drug-induced brain damage. To answer the question, if you want to make it affordable, have Medicare basic coverage start paying for naturopathy, acupuncture, reflexology, adequate chiropractic, homeopathy and other non-allopathic modalities as opposed to the mainstream ‘cut-and-drug’ approach which leads only to chronic illness by failing to utilize the body’s own innate healing capacity. Then people wouldn’t have to GO to the doctor constantly, health care costs would diminish and everybody’d be healthier. But I guess that’s ‘un-American’ and we ALL know that we have ‘arguably the best healthcare system on the planet’. Just ask all the people who have been lobotomized by psych drugs, killed by opioid drug ODs, had their immune systems decimated by chemotherapy and radiation so the cancer comes back and easily snuffs out an organism with no defenses, etc.
anonymous
2019-05-13 14:37:35 UTC
Yes, something needs to be done about these drug companies.
anonymous
2019-05-13 03:18:35 UTC
Yes, there IS a very elegant solution.
anonymous
2019-05-12 22:53:08 UTC
GET THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OUT OF THE DOCTOR'S OFFICE!! You can't name a single thing that didn't cost more as the result of unconstitutional federal interference. There is NOTHING in the Constitution that grants the federal government any authority to interfere in health care. Hold people responsible for their actions. Drunks, junkies, smokers, fat people, bed hoppers and criminal migrants drive costs upward and expect everyone else to pay. If I have to pay for someone else's care, I DEMAND the right to dictate their activities so as to mitigate my costs.
anonymous
2019-05-12 16:07:35 UTC
Rather than focus on single payer or not, we need to focus on why costs are high and address that. If a drug company is allowed to charge $100 for a prescription that’s $20 in most countries, the healthcare cost is $100 regardless of whether it’s paid by private insurance or social insurance. It’s the same with malpractice, end of life care, etc.



We need to focus less on party agenda and focus more on what has caused healthcare costs to increase so much.
anonymous
2019-05-12 15:33:18 UTC
Taxes, dude. Taxes.
Pearl L
2019-05-12 15:28:47 UTC
to rne its already affordable
Const. King
2019-05-16 02:49:59 UTC
The only way to make it affordable is to stop greed, thievery & corruption and I don't think you will ever stop that. It's disgusting when CEO's get $150 million dollar bonuses & they spend most of their time on the golf course and to top it off they want more.
kathy_used_to_be_an_obgyn
2019-05-14 16:29:33 UTC
Interesting question!
Mr. Wizard
2019-05-13 23:52:30 UTC
Well, we had that chance---and you can thank John McCain who BETRAYED America at virtually the last second--by voting to PROTECT the once known "Obamacare".



The ONLY way I see getting doctors, hospitals, Big Pharma and Health Care / Health Insurance corporates all to work on customer affordability is to offer them sweet Tax breaks ONLY if they DEFLATE DOWN their already high price gouging fees, rates and premiums.



But ah--that's a balancing act:



1) Price DEFLATION won't make those STOCKHOLDERS in Congress happy.



2) President Trump's THE WALL is looking like a go for construction---a historic event as being one of the world's largest building feats ever known. And you know what's next when THE WALL is completed: Mexican immigrant laborers will LEGALLY REGISTER FOR U.S. CITIZENSHIP.....oh, this don't bode well for Corporate America!!!! Imagine the nightmare of paying LEGAL MEXICAN IMMIGRANTS U.S. MINIMUM WAGES instead of the $3.38/ hour.



And we know what happens when Corporate America gets ANGRY!!!!
Murican Patriot
2019-05-13 20:53:35 UTC
Don't get sick or injured.
?
2019-05-13 19:29:48 UTC
healthcare democrat use it use the poor indigent so they get votes
lonewolf
2019-05-13 18:18:26 UTC
Yes we need to stop treating doctors like God's and lower their cost. Plus we all need to stop eating red meat. This would eliminate big pharma and sky high drug prices.
thegreatone
2019-05-13 15:16:27 UTC
In general? Yes.



With the way Americans are? No.
anonymous
2019-05-13 14:17:15 UTC
Not w/ the right wing resistance. The US right wing is the only entity in the first world that doesn't consider health care a human right. There are plenty of blueprints that work in other countries w/ no effort to change the blueprint.

I don't know where you get your info or what your prioritized parameters are but the following ranked the US 11th in the world in 2013.

https://www.internationalinsurance.com/health/systems/

It's about mindset (the actual health care equation is too complicated for almost all/most of us). Countless people think, if you can't afford it, you deserve to suffer. Many/most of them won't admit it ... it's depicted in conduct/behavior.
anonymous
2019-05-13 11:19:11 UTC
Deport all hongkongese sex workers in the USA.

hongkongese sex workers are ugly and useless and make all the STDs.
robert2020
2019-05-13 10:22:30 UTC
The o ly real way is to do research on the AGEING PROCESS ITSELF. Curing old age-- at least moderating it-- is the only answer.



Treating disease only means a longer span of senility. And more people in old folks homes.
?
2019-05-13 08:27:22 UTC
I'm sure there is I live in England and we have The NHS That is the National Health Service and that is free to everyone,

And that is paid for by people who work and pay tax.
Teddy-wococarbide
2019-05-13 07:59:27 UTC
wococarbide
?
2019-05-13 07:04:44 UTC
Your opening statement is not backed up by any measurable health indicator. You need to do a comparison with other western countries all over the world that have Universal Govt funded Health care, America comes out very poorly on all parameters. The most common cause of personal Bankruptcy in America is a person having a chronic health condition. Issues like that just do not happen in other Western countries!!!!!!!
anonymous
2019-05-13 05:10:15 UTC
Compared with many countries the US healthcare system offers a poor service for many people.
Mr. Knowledgeable VI
2019-05-12 23:46:00 UTC
When it comes to making healthcare affordable in the United States, here are five ways I believe we can make healthcare affordable without breaking the bank;



1) There needs to be a government program that provides health insurance to Americans who do not have coverage. This includes the poor, elderly, disabled, college students, unemployed and Americans who cannot get insurance through their employer.

2) Medical coverage must cover you with a pre-existing condition and cannot deny you coverage for a current condition.

3) A medical deductable can be no higher than a $1000 for an adult, $500 for a senior citizen or full time college student and $250 for a child and once your deductable is met, the insurance company pays for the rest of the cost. Also, medical insurance needs to be like automotive insurance that you purchase the types of insurance you need in order to survive.

4) All medical facilities need to accept your insurance provider no matter who you get coverage from.

5) You have up to one year to pay off medical bills; that way someone doesn't have to make a decision because medical bills or paying the mortgage or medical bills and food.
anonymous
2019-05-12 19:58:24 UTC
Yes make a doctors wage low
anonymous
2019-05-12 15:45:34 UTC
You're starting from an invalid argument. America doesn't have the best healthcare system on the planet. In fact, we're not even in the top 10. We have the most expensive system, but it's not all that good and definitely inefficient.



A single payer system is the best way to make it affordable for all. Prices are raised because people are treated and have no ability to pay, which means those costs are passed on to others. If all of the care was covered, the prices would equalize.
anonymous
2019-05-12 15:39:32 UTC
"America has what is arguably the best healthcare system on the planet"



Only if you measure it by Wall Street standards: producing shareholder value, and revenue growth in excess of inflation and population growth.



By metrics like life expectancy, and infant mortality, we're the worst, or almost the worst, in the developed world.
anonymous
2019-05-12 15:34:45 UTC
What's the point of having the "best" healthcare if we can't even afford it lol
anonymous
2019-05-12 15:23:21 UTC
it's the best there is, and 'best' costs .....................
anonymous
2019-05-17 06:39:36 UTC
I wouldn’t exactly call it the best given that out of 11 countries it ranked last I still don’t understand why the richest nation on earth has gone for a European approach while allowing privatised hospitals too it just doesn’t make sense to me growing up with the NHS and not having to worry about a 90000 dollar cancer treatment bill that isn’t guaranteed to improve you chances by much than other western nations
Jahal
2019-05-15 00:15:11 UTC
Of Course! Go where the money is. Tax big pharma even half of what they should pay, and fund health care for all Americans 🏥🏥💰💰💰💵💵
CMoney
2019-05-14 15:18:01 UTC
America does NOT have the best healthcare system UNLESS you are rich or have really great health insurance. Single payer for all
Raymond L.
2019-05-14 05:04:07 UTC
Greed
Aaron
2019-05-14 02:20:40 UTC
We have models to go off of.
?
2019-05-14 02:13:07 UTC
the entire system would have to e overhauled.
anonymous
2019-05-13 23:40:52 UTC
Sure. First, get a job with an excellent healthcare benefit. This is not hard to do. Every job I have had since completing my education has come with such a benefit. So, a preliminary requirement is to get a good education in some meaningful and useful field of study. The good education, in turn, implies that you and your parents have prepared for college by saving money for it, and you have an excellent high school record. Best of luck!
anonymous
2019-05-13 23:21:09 UTC
Yes its good
anonymous
2019-05-13 21:13:23 UTC
Yes, with free healthcare, just like in other developed countries.
anonymous
2019-05-13 15:50:19 UTC
I think we need to be clear on a few things



The US has the best healthcare in the world when it comes to capabilities and outcome



The issue is with the delivery system



The over regulation and litigiousness of the system makes it very inefficient and expensive



We need to get Government out of the Healthcare system. All the issues can be traced back to government involvement and to the Democrat creation of the whole HMO concept



Let physicians and patients work out what is best
?
2019-05-13 15:27:53 UTC
Don't give healthcare to those who don't deserve it
mery
2019-05-13 13:14:41 UTC
There is!
stephen
2019-05-13 11:31:29 UTC
Medicare for all, and take the money from taxes. It's defintely not the best there is and doesn't make it into the top 5 in Worldwide ratings. Look at Joan Rivers - went in for routing operation and dead.
anonymous
2019-05-13 06:56:00 UTC
Yes, look at more efficient healthcare systems liek Germany, Sweden and other European countries. The US healthcare system has very limited access to poor people and is yet the most expensive system worldwide. That is because of the lobby of rich big health"care" companies that receive too much money for drugs that the US helathcare system could get much cheaper. Private business is not always good, but sometimes corrupt, especially when it involveds big business.
anonymous
2019-05-13 04:05:08 UTC
Socialism
cjware1974
2019-05-13 03:21:24 UTC
No because what is affordable to one person might not necessarily mean it be a affordable to other people.
anonymous
2019-05-13 01:53:29 UTC
certainly,

let the free market run the healthcare system

keep the government out of healthcare
Carter
2019-05-12 19:39:37 UTC
That’s a hard one
Jim
2019-05-12 17:48:26 UTC
Medicare for all. It’s not a complicated or crazy idea. It works in every developed nation, and the vast majority of Americans want it. The will of the people should be heard
Spock (rhp)
2019-05-12 15:53:07 UTC
reducing cost in America would require, in essence, two major changes --



1. reducing the number and cost of lawsuits over adverse outcomes, and

2. reducing usage of medical facilities.



Reducing lawsuits can't be done as it is protected by the Dim party which benefits greatly from campaign contributions from lawyers.



Reducing usage would likely require both some common sense information sharing requirements, and what amounts to a national ID database, plus pretty stiff added taxes on those human behaviors that cause a need for medical care.



[Examples of the last point: why do the victims of drunk drivers pay through either their auto or health insurance when the alcohol industry [which profited from the sale of the booze] isn't paying instead? why does health insurance pay for the foreseeable effects of alcoholism on consumers instead of the alcohol industry which profited from the sale of those products? same point regarding tobacco. same point regarding obesity. same point regarding illegal drugs. same point regarding violence.]



{Aside: our schools of public health pointed out several decades ago that half of all American medical care costs are due to these five behaviors of Americans. And that didn't include the lost income effects of the deceased.}
anonymous
2019-05-15 16:15:21 UTC
Take blacks off
?
2019-05-15 15:01:18 UTC
Line up all the "not for profit" health care execs and all the health insurance execs in front of a firing line.
?
2019-05-15 11:07:25 UTC
Go back to where we were long before (Obama the dividers) Care.
Chuck
2019-05-15 01:35:39 UTC
Enforce an affordable price that the drug company's must adhere to.



Also enforce a maximum wage law on doctors and researchers. It's okay to enforce a minimum wage on the workers so enforce a maximum wage on all overpaid professions.
?
2019-05-14 20:30:51 UTC
Cure heart disease, cancer, and diabetes, and complications of old age.
John W
2019-05-14 12:34:04 UTC
Take away the profit
D
2019-05-14 11:49:33 UTC
YOU COULD LET THE MARKET WORK BUT YOU GET WHAT YOU PAY FOR
?
2019-05-14 07:54:02 UTC
Root out the scammers who overcharge patients just because they have good insurance or the state will pay for it. You will still get good care but if you're paying cash, you get what you need and nothing more. That's a good thing and I will explain why...



When a patient has no insurance, not even state subsidized coverage, hospitals charge way less. This is from personal experience. Someone I know broke her leg and refused to sign up for state aid (she didn't want to claim assets, etc,). What cost her out of pocket about $20k, the hospital (by their own admission) could have billed insurance or Medicaid more than twice that amount. Because they were guaranteed cash payments they were willing to accept less because they didn't have to wait to be paid or pay someone to file the forms.



Part of my job has included medical billing and providing health insurance for employees. The premiums are crippling, the deductibles insurmountable, drug prices are inflated. The industry have their customers, sick vulnerable human beings, up against a wall. How much is your life, your child's life, you're loved ones' lives worth?



The worst is Medicare fraud. Elderly patients sometimes don't have advocates to help them navigate the billing system. They get overcharged for everything, equipment they don't need or services they never received. Expand it to Medicare for all and it will be a free-for-all unless they get it under control first.



And this isn't at the feet of any political party or the result of any legislation. I've been watching this slow-motion car wreck since the 80's. It's the medical industry. The Affordable Care Act was supposed to bring down costs but the industry refused to comply because they didn't have to.



Don't worry. Even if Medicare for All goes through, patients still need Medicare Supplement insurance because Medicare only pays a portion of the expenses and limits on covered care.
Axiom
2019-05-13 23:39:16 UTC
Yes! Impeach that charlatan you have making America a laughing stock on the international stage and seize all his assets that would be a good start.
?
2019-05-13 04:55:51 UTC
Stop the government from intervening.
anonymous
2019-05-13 01:41:43 UTC
Yes. Add the insurance agencies back into the mix, but, this time let there be competition across state lines. Something the democrats have blocked for years.
W.T. Door
2019-05-13 01:40:08 UTC
It WAS affordable before the Democrats put "Obamacare" into law.



I had family medical/dental/prescription/vision/disability/life policy with a $500 family deductible for $800/month prior to Obamacare. After Obamacare, it went to $1500/month with the disability & life coverage deleted, a $1500 per person deductible, and higher co-pays on everything. My share of the cost of prescription medications quintupled or more.
anonymous
2019-05-12 23:16:34 UTC
make blacks pay
gojo
2019-05-12 23:08:27 UTC
Read Micheal Porter's Redefining Healthcare which states we have to allow a free market to evolve in healthcare so that supply and demand dictate prices.
anonymous
2019-05-12 18:17:53 UTC
The U.S has what is arguably the best healthcare system on the planet.? Who can use it if NONE CAN AFFORD IT.? Then it is a waste of time.

Best cost money? In Germany, you get excellent service and the cost is minimal (if ANYTHING AT ALL). Their medicine equals if not betters the U.S., as do in many other Socialist Democratic countries.

. Besides the U.S. system ain't the best. It is not even in the top 10.

It may have the Best Patent protection system, but once the patents expire then they are GONE. So anyone can make that drug and make it cheaper. And they do...the same quality if not better.



Check out other country "HEALTH-CARE systems" and you can see that the U.S. LAGS behind as it is there for the BUCK. They care about no one but themselves. Everything is "FOR PROFIT"(GROSS PROFITS TOO).



. You are on the internet. You can surf freely(still) so you can go to other countries and see what they got for systems. AND how those systems work for those people. Healthcare is done all around the world. "NOT BASED" on a U.S. model. Not everyone is rushing to go to the U.S.A.

They come from the south because walking is FREE as they cannot afford a car or donkey or boat or plane flight. Those that are not leaving such as Mexicans have better and cheaper medical doctors than what are in the U.S. as many from the U.S. go south for plastic surgery.
anonymous
2019-05-12 17:14:30 UTC
America doesn't have the best healthcare system, if that were the case, everyone would be rushing to copy it. I live in a country with single payer, it's not perfect but I would never trade it for the US healthcare system.
Maxi
2019-05-12 15:33:39 UTC
With private money it enables the best equipment, it enables new inventions and procedures to be used........ shame is that only the rich can afford to use it or the very poor that get it paid for..the majority don't ........ tax payer paying for it would make it free for all so treat everyone equally but there will be a limit on drugs that can be used, procedures that can be done, simply as the money is not there to provide endless treatment, with drugs being legalised more and more that is and will in the future cause a huge increases in mental health issues so it is going to get more expensive not less...and even in countries with free or generally free medical care at point of use they already set limits of any illnesses associated by smoking /alcohol....... fact is if you do not have a healthy community it affects lots of areas of life...same with if you don't have an educated, work productive community it affect everyone else, so the balance is important........... just pleased I do not live in a country where if you get cancer or need a heart/kidney transplant and are not rich, you either have to resort to going bankrupt, begging for donations or dying
anonymous
2019-05-12 15:31:48 UTC
IDK
?
2019-05-12 15:25:34 UTC
Since we wouldn't have to reinvent the wheel, why not study countries who have great health care systems that are working and design ours using their best ideas?
scott b
2019-05-12 15:23:59 UTC
"America has what is arguably the best healthcare system on the planet"



America doesn't even have CLOSE to the best healthcare system on the planet. Our healthcare system is broken and barely functional.
Bob
2019-05-15 18:43:20 UTC
Open the drug companies to competition. Oh by the way you should go to Costco if you are doing an out of pocket prescription as it’s usually the cheapest. You do not have to be a member to use the pharmacy
?
2019-05-15 09:06:58 UTC
We don't actually have the best system in the world. We are the best in certain specific areas, afaik, but a lot worse in others.



I think the best thing we could do would be to have an *optional* single-payer national plan, with the full authority to, eg, negotiate prices. That is, a federal health plan that people (and businesses buying health care for their employees) can pay for just like they currently pay for health insurance. The national plan would be designed so that it is supported by the people who pay into the system (plus whatever we're currently paying for things like medicaid), so that it has an incentive to keep costs low.



This would keep the government health system "honest" (if it's too expensive, or the outcomes are too bad, people will get private insurance instead of opting in for the government plan), but still give it considerable economies of scale, allow it enough data to figure out and implement the best ways to get cost-effective treatment (eg if an inexpensive change in hospital equipment cuts hospital-acquired infections by a significant amount, they can get every hospital to make that change), and give it enough "throw weight" to negotiate good deals with drug manufacturers and the like. I mean, any sensible drug company, if given the guarantee that, say, half of the US population that needs a given drug will be buying it from the government plan, will do its best to be the manufacturer that the government contracts to supply that drug.



The presence of private care, meanwhile, would allow more experimentation with novel treatments (if a novel treatment turns out to be too expensive or ineffective, better that it be 1000 patients that are getting it than several million), allow people to pay for more convenient (but not necessarily higher-quality) care like house calls or "on demand" appointments, and otherwise provide a meaningful alternative to what is likely to be a somewhat rule-bound and conservative federal system.
2017
2019-05-14 19:40:03 UTC
you want to be healthy, stay away from doctors and their very dangerous drugs.
anonymous
2019-05-14 07:13:37 UTC
Kick out all the foreign trash and black people having kids every other year for money
anonymous
2019-05-14 04:10:22 UTC
Leave it to the Free Market. Socialized medicine always causes hyper-inflation and inferior service. Even so, come, Lord Jesus!
anonymous
2019-05-13 20:26:17 UTC
deadbeats
anonymous
2019-05-13 15:11:59 UTC
move to Cda
Armchair Goddess #1
2019-05-13 13:29:55 UTC
The Nixon/Reagan-deregulated insurance industry is a very giant "baby" with a huge Republican-given "lollipop" of no oversight, no regulations, and no consumer protections---1300 for-profit greed-driven insurers that became an ALL-PROFITS, NO PAYOUTS system with help from the Koch-funded corporate-colluding Congressional Republicans from 1979 on through to now. The insurance lobby outnumbers our elected representatives in Washington by at least 100 to 1---all of them paid to be 100% against any attempt to take their GOP-granted "lollypop" of deregulation away from them.



And then came the 2009 election with a Democrat-controlled 111th Congress and a visionary named Barack Hussein Obama as the people-chosen new President, with a dream to get affordable health care and long-needed insurance reforms for the American people. Voila! A hard-won passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (P.L.111-148) and its supplemental Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act (P.L.111-152), a.k.a., the Affordable Care Act or "Obama Care."



The reason the public-private approach to health care and insurance reform was pursued rather than a "Medicaid for All" approach had a lot to do with America's history of being a yin-yang balance between capitalism (for profit, privately owned...which the insurance industry had become) and socialism (taxpayer funded, people owned) which is what a "Medicaid for All" approach would have been. But the Obama Care option was also financially wise because of the Republican-caused economic devastations we were facing---the 2004-2009 collapse of our housing and credit markets that cost millions of Americans their homes and blighted far too many urban communities, thus lowering property values for remaining homeowners (putting them "underwater" in terms of borrowing power); the price-gouging on gas during oilmen Cheney and Bush years; and the nearly fatal GOP-deregulation-caused MELTDOWN of our entire financial system due to criminal behaviors of bankers and Wall Street---a MELTDOWN that took us into the worst economic recession since the GOP-caused Great Depression (1929-1938), bankrupting most of our European trading partners, thus slowing our own recovery prospects. By the end 2008 (with Republicans in totalitarian power from 2001 through to 2008), the U.S. was losing more than 800,000 jobs per month---and each job loss meant less revenues for local, state, and federal taxes; Social Security FICA taxes, and dried up consumer spending that put small businesses at risk. If we had gone for the Medicaid For All approach, putting those 1300 capitalist insurers out of business, how many more jobs would have been eliminated? This was a huge consideration in shaping the oversight and reforms for the existing insurance industry, and explains why the public-private combination of the Affordable Care Act made the most sense.



Your question is about affordability, and the insurance lobby bullied Republicans have attacked the very things included in Obama Care that would keep insurance affordable: (a) The mandatory component for well-off healthy young people who want to game the system---not get insurance that they can easily afford, but then use the more expensive ER for non-emergency with no intention of paying...passing those costs on to other consumers through higher premiums; and (b) Eliminating the ACA's state-by-state oversight panels that would evaluate any insurer's effort to raise premiums higher than the cost-of-living rates, causing an audit of that insurer to determine if there was a legitimate reason for making the excessive increase. As you can probably imagine, the spoiled-brat lollipop-devouring 1300 for-profit insurers hated both of these ACA provisions with a purple passion---and so we, the people, can actually LOBBY or DEMONSTRATE to get these cost-reducing insurers-reforming features of Obama Care put back in.



Another way to lower costs overall is to go after "Big Pharma," also deregulated by the campaign-donations-lusting Koch-backed Republicans. Look for the Presidential and Congressional candidates who have a plan to bring the multi-trillion-dollar corrupt and GOP-deregulated pharmaceutical industry into compliance with consumer protection measures. For now, the one candidate with a plan is long-time consumer advocate and economics expert Elizabeth Warren, but attend the rallies in this next year and ask the right questions of any of these candidates---get the idea of regulating the pharmaceutical industry into the platforms of each candidate, and that would be yet another way to get the health care system affordable.
?
2019-05-13 12:06:56 UTC
Sure. But what is that?
?
2019-05-13 11:00:53 UTC
yes there are several - but 1st thing the US has to do to implement any of them is get away from the idea that in all circumstances "money talks" - then it can have a national system

YES the rich will pay to have (what they think is) better healthcare - but the rich in all countries do , but that dont mean they shouldnt contribute to a global system



Once its done that then it can investigate the systems in other countries

(the BIG problem is- the people doing the investing would be politician , and they have a vested interest in keeping the status quote , and will be open to pressure from lobby groups (insurance companies) that have a lot to lose and deep pockets to prevent losing it)



"America has what is arguably the best healthcare system on the planet"



there is no argument - it dont



it pays far more in total for its healthcare and gets far less than other coontries in return



YES they rich can get great healthcare but pay a lot for it



The middle get adequate healthcare - but the insurance for it costs far more than they would have to pay in other countries (dont matter if they pay for it or their employers - its still the cost of their heathcare)



For thoset a the bottom their healthcare is very poor - but its still paid for by the state



Add up all the costs (personal for the rich, insurance for the middle + the amount the insurance pays out in claims, and state for those at the bottom) the total is huge compared to other countries,
?
2019-05-13 01:31:29 UTC
Tort reform is a start.
anonymous
2019-05-13 00:31:40 UTC
Replace Medicare and Medicaid with Universal Healthcare.
anonymous
2019-05-12 20:10:57 UTC
No it's to late to do anything now greed has settled in our healthcare system .I disagree, we have the best tecnology when it comes to our healthcare but we also have doctors that don't really care who are just in it for the money .
anonymous
2019-05-12 17:44:04 UTC
Prevention. Hey, if I have heart failure, and need surgery, there’s no place I’d rather be than here in the U.S. However, it would be much more affordable and much better for me if that heart problem was prevented in the first place.



By focusing on care, and not prevention we miss what is more affordable and creates a healthier population.
anonymous
2019-05-12 15:27:00 UTC
Medicare and subsidies is what raises costs so high. We need to stop depending on the nanny state.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...