Question:
I'm curious what GOP but not particularly Ron Paul types think of this video. What do you think?
DAR
2009-05-14 10:29:54 UTC
Ron Paul supporters might be interested too.

Other GOP, do you think the Jeb Bush direction or the Ron Paul direction is better, or is there a different direction you see the party moving in? I'd appreciate it if you would view the video and comment.

I'm not trying to exclude anyone's comments, though.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hmogdpqv2mo&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Edailypaul%2Ecom%2Fnode%2F92931&feature=player_embedded
Eight answers:
bwlobo
2009-05-14 14:06:29 UTC
Great video... awesome. I'm so glad to be understanding more about Ron Paul. Like the last photo in this video, Ron Paul is out of the Republican box. At his point, it's a big plus+ to think outside the box of elite Republicans. Ron has economic answers, not just philosophical theories.
raffaele
2016-10-25 14:37:55 UTC
properly there are distinct useless White human beings and dislocated out of properties White human beings in Joplin MO. wager the dummy Ron Paul ignored that. this isn't a *Katrina* project the position lots of the victims and the useless were Black individuals that maximum human beings in this u . s . a . did not care or provide a d@@m about. Katrina had a lot more advantageous numbers of deaths too. * "a minimum of 1836 human beings lost their lives in hurricane Katrina" * although via hurricanes and tornados etc, a lack of life is a lack of life, yet this u . s . a . has a discriminating way of not treating all deaths an same. those Whites in Joplin should not be referred to as *"stupid"* and different nasty ignorant names because they *"did not go away"*. everybody will experience very sorry for them (as they ought to because it truly is an really unhappy journey no matter the coloration of their pores and skin) and they received't be stranded and displaced for months and YEARS like the Katrina victims nevertheless are! President Obama is already on the case as he has been for the purely proper few months in the different parts that were previously hit demanding. He doesn't choose which state to help and which one now to not help.
2009-05-14 16:55:01 UTC
My position is as priceless as it is worthless to most stalwart Republicans (likewise to all other factions {aka: parties}) because until recently, I've been a lifelong Reagan Republican.



Now? Factions of every demonic misnomer occupy equal status with termite colonies. [Hey. They's par'n numbahs, ain't they?]



While I still strongly admire every genuine quality the man brought to DC - as well as how he brought DC and a clearer picture of the limitations of government into our living rooms - at the same time, I've begun to study the Constitution carefully. [Now, parties really bite the grub.]



I now see all presidents - and congresses - with whose legacies I'm familiar, under the new and vastly different light of the Constitution itself and of all those who contributed to its structure, of those who walked out and even those three who remained to the bitter end but refused to sign.



I have new admiration for JFK but not Ted and certainly not LBJ. I've gathered just enough fact to create more questions than answers about FDR, about the madness that befell Wilson and how much of his own legacy can be blamed on that illness... the list just goes on.



Lincoln is a new source of myriad conflicts of logic, given his antebellum stance on Constitutional adherence over his later and peculiarly out-of-character admiration for Henry Clay and a domineering central government at the expense of all justice.



Great video. Thanks.



Next time, send a shrink to untangle the worm-knot it tied my brains into.



...
2009-05-14 10:38:43 UTC
Ron Paul will win over alot of conservatives with his economic plans, but he has too many radical policies on other issues. That's his overall appearance to me, good but a little too radical.



Jeb is a dope. Anyone that says we need to forget about Reagan is just a big wuss. The man created 20 million jobs and defended this country on every level. We need that kind of conservative leader again. Republicans that say we don't are just intimidated by how conservative Reagan was and they don't have the onions to go down that route.



Romney is probably the most conservative, but again, he needs to step up to the plate. Be a true conservative and stop trying to play both sides and be nice.



That's how the Democrats won. They didn't play to the middle at all and now we have the most liberal president in history. Liberal meaning radical left.
Vote Republicrat
2009-05-14 11:17:37 UTC
Ron Paul is the only one with any credibility in regard to wanting to cut spending and shrink government. Everybody else has said they were for those things, but advocated the opposite. You can only do that for so long before people stop paying attention to you (as is currently happening). I think more of a Libertarian approach is the GOPs only option if they wish to remain a viable politcal party.



btw, radically huge government and radical spending call for "radical" downsizing and "radical" spending cuts.
Zenmeister
2009-05-14 10:43:40 UTC
We are definitely going to move towards libertarianism. I have no doubt about it.



BTW- Did you see that Rand Paul is making a major announcement today on the Rachel Maddow show? Lets hope its to announce his candidacy for Senate in KY.
Holy Cow!
2009-05-14 10:37:18 UTC
Paultards are too busy worshiping. Bush is a damaged brand.
2009-05-14 10:34:27 UTC
Neither. Jeb is moderate to liberal which is what we don't need. and Ron although I like some of his idea's is much to radical to be elected.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...