Question:
Did the Bush administration do anything to improve the lives of the American people?
anonymous
2009-03-18 16:24:14 UTC
I am trying to think exactly what will George W Bush's legacy be and honestly I can't thin of one thing he did to improve the lives of Americans from 8 years ago. Under Clinton there are plenty of things he did to improve the lives of Americans including a surplus in the Treasury. I can't think of anything Bush has done for America, its almost as if George W. tried to destroy the country.
Eighteen answers:
anonymous
2009-03-18 16:33:24 UTC
his claim to fame is "I kept America safe, there have been no more attacks since I was in charge".



That is an arguable point, because we really don't know if there would have been attacks if he was the president or not. I honestly don't think a terrorist group cares who is president. and that is something Americans seem to not be able to understand (they think that Terrorist actually fear a president in office) if you have a group of people that are willing to blow themselves up to kill an enemy, you think they are scared of who is in office?
andrado
2016-10-07 01:46:14 UTC
interior the aftermath of the 9/11 assaults and united states of america's next invasion of Afghanistan, the Bush administration grew to grow to be lots greater centred on battling worldwide terrorism. Their oftentimes occurring aims weren't the terrorists themselves, however the governments who supported them. Of maximum precedence to Bush became Iraq, which had long been accused of having a covert weapons of mass destruction software and doubtless even planned to . The rhetoric that got here from his administration became that the Iraqi government below Saddam Hussein may be keen to dispense its arsenal to anti-American terrorist agencies, going to date as alleging ties between Iraq and al-Qaeda. not one of the information supplied by using intelligence companies implicated Hussein in any of this, and the Bush administration went out of its thank you to discredit any information to the different. i think of George W. Bush's intentions have been helpful. He observed Saddam Hussein as an extremely ruthless tyrant who should not be allowed to rule a rustic - and rightly so. Saddam Hussein progressed a pervasive cult of character around himself, accomplished and tortured a countless form of harmless human beings on the mere suspicion of dissidence, committed genocide against the Kurdish human beings interior the north by using employing chemical gas, brutally repressed the Iraqi Shi'ite community, invaded 3 neighbouring countries devoid of provocation (Iran, Kuwait, and temporarily Saudi Arabia), released missile assaults against Israel for no different reason than to income community help, and subsidized terrorist agencies against his political competitors. thousands of thousands (if no longer hundreds of thousands) died on the palms of the Hussein regime in Iraq. yet Bush's justification for invading the rustic became defective and the conflict as an entire became unwell-conceived. they did no longer think on the topic of the Sunni-Shia conflict that would desire to surprisingly much unquestionably engulf Iraq afterwards, and defence secretary Donald Rumsfeld did no longer make any attempt to devise out the post-invasion part of the conflict. the end result became a bloody sectarian conflict that keeps to as we communicate.
anonymous
2009-03-18 16:46:15 UTC
How about no more attacks on our nation since 9/11.



Oh, and lets not forget tax cuts.





Like Obama will keep our taxes low...



They've already gone up!





We're screwed!
anonymous
2009-03-18 16:34:37 UTC
he tried to roll back all of clinton's tax and waste bills and got rid of clinton's largest ever tax increase and tried to slow the recession clinton started while fighting a war.
Rick W
2009-03-18 16:57:14 UTC
No, he's been too busy making Iranian lives better.
phule_poet
2009-03-18 16:30:05 UTC
I’m sure the Hindus in the US felt especially safe after many ignorant uneducated idiots targeted them for being Muslims
wooper
2009-03-18 16:31:10 UTC
Well, the top 2% got a tax break. I'm sure that improved their lives.



The rest are still waiting for the trickle down effect to take place.
Uncle Says Think!
2009-03-18 16:32:35 UTC
After the sept 11th attack, we averted many attacks and were not attacked on our soil. Lets hope Obama takes this as serious as he did.
anonymous
2009-03-18 17:05:40 UTC
he destroyed a civilation, he bankrupted the country - he stole our rights, he tortured people.



he was destructive.
anonymous
2009-03-18 16:39:37 UTC
so he did nothing good and yet he was elected for 2 terms?
anonymous
2009-03-18 16:30:28 UTC
Was that a yellow or orange alert?



Duct-tape or visqueen?
barefoot prince
2009-03-18 16:29:53 UTC
Your free to write your thoughts down because of Bush. He was man enough to stand between us and the terrorists......



big difference in the wuss we have now that wants everyone to love America even if he gives us to them and we become a third world nation, which obama relates to ..... what a crock!!
Ishmael
2009-03-18 16:30:30 UTC
Actually, he did a lot to help America



He passed both economic and enviromental reforms...he also has continued to keep America safe.



My question is...what has he done wrong?
Mr. Obvious
2009-03-18 16:28:22 UTC
Has the United States been attacked since 9/11?
racism is unbecoming
2009-03-18 16:28:39 UTC
The very wealthy, yes.
anonymous
2009-03-18 16:28:15 UTC
Would you give it a friggin rest already?



And just what is clinton's legacy??? A hummer in the oval office...greeeaaaaat.
anonymous
2009-03-18 16:28:42 UTC
The best thing possible. You're alive aren't you.



Kept taxes low.
rwb13
2009-03-18 16:28:49 UTC
personally, i think keeping this country safe from attack isn't small potatoes.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...