If Liberals are for women's rights how can they be so vicious towards Sarah Palin, Michelle Malkin, etc?

Question

I have always wondered about this. Liberals claim the moral high ground in support of women's rights and harp on Republicans waging a "war on women". Yet, look at the hateful, sexist things they've said about Sarah Palin. Look at how they degrade Ann Coulter as a "bimbo" or when they call Michelle Malkin a "mail order bride". Many of them even threw Hillary Clinton under a bus in 2008 with the whole "bros before hoes" campaign. Is this really the behavior of the people who claim to be pro-woman?!?!?!

Answer 1

Liberals are very focused, anyone or any thought outside their focus, they HATE!



They don't care about women, they care about abortion as a political issue. That's why they let butchers do abortions on poor women for decades and overlook the carnage. (See Kermit Gosnell)

Answer 2

Ah another ignorati.



Are you under the delusion that being for equal rights means all women have to agree with each other? They are the epitome of what we are fighting against, air headed women who don't give a crap about women's rights and are just fine with the government in our uteri.



I have not heard any sexist things said about conservative women except by conservatives. Who love to criticize women for stupid stuff like how we dress, etc. Or calling us names for things that men are praised for. I have never heard those terms you claim used by liberals, only conservatives. And as is typical of your kind, you provide no source. Which means you made it up.



And why the hell would WOMEN say bros before hoes? And why on earth would anyone call Hillary a hoe. More words that cons use and liberal women do not.



Go back to school, your ignorance embarrasses you. We support equal rights, but that doesn't mean we agree with all women. Anyone with half a brain would know that.



Morons, Sarah Palin is ignorant She is rich because she is ignorant, based on her own words. (Which she then claims were altered to make her look stupid). She is also a failure and a quitter. She had to go to five different colleges to get her degree, quit her job as mayor, quit her job as governor. She can't finish anything. And she insults disabled people.

Answer 3

Conservative women have the right to speak, but that doesn't mean everyone has to agree with their political stance . I have a lot of disagreement with the two right wing women you cite, because they are pushing an agenda by trying to mold all women into their own mindset. If they want to preach, let them go to a church service, not through politics. As far as I am concerned they are not for women's rights, and they are not very nice about how they come across to the general public.



It works both ways, the Right wing are not immune to viciousness.

Answer 4

????



Liberals haven't done anything to take away the rights of either of them. So your question makes NO sense.



We attack what they SAY, because they are both HORRIBLE excuses for human beings. Supporting rights for women does NOT mean we can never disagree with what any woman ever says.



Yes, the GOP are trying to take away women's rights. That's just FACT.



Yes, liberals disagree with the hate-mongering morons. and liars -- even when they are women.



So why do YOU think liberals should AGREE with those two freaks? Even though they want women's rights taken away? That makes no sense.



No, we don't say SEXIST things about Palin. We don't say she's wrong BECAUSE SHE'S A WOMAN, we say she's wrong BECAUSE SHE'S WRONG. We call her a moron because she clearly IS a moron.



That doesn't mean we call ALL women morons; just the ones who ARE.



I know of no liberal who called Coulter a bimbo. I just call her a bat-sh*t crazy lying sack of sh*t -- because she IS.



??? YOu give NO evidence any liberal called any of them any of those things.



No, no one threw Clinton under a bus. I didn't vote for her because I have always found her too conservative.



???? What campaign did YOU watch, because the one I saw never said "bros before hoes" -- I guess you were in some alternate reality at the time.



Being for women's rights doesn't mean that when THREE women are trying to destroy my country, that I have to agree with them.



Were you always completely brain-dead, or did your one brain cell die off after you were born?

Answer 5

This is nothing. You should have seen them duck and cover jn the 90s when it came to light Clinton raped Juanita Broderick, sexually harassed Paula Jones, and groped Kathleen Wiley. NOW(National Organization for Women) backed down on those issues for Clinton and forever ruined their reputation with the public.

Answer 6

"Women's rights" really means "Liberal Women's rights"



When someone ask's "are we ready for a women president?"



What they really mean is "are we ready for a liberal women president?"



Bill Maher can call Sarah Palin the "C" word and get applauded, but say something bad about Hillary and your a hate monger.



There is a democrat War on Women,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, just ask Ted Kennedy, or Chris Dodd, or Anthony Weiner, or Billy BJ Clinton, or all the women democrats have attacked like Paula Jones, Chandra Levy, Gennifer Flowers, Mary Jo Kopechne, Monica Lewinsky, Kathleen Willey, Elizabeth Gracen, Juanita Broaddrick, Sally Perdue.



Hey how about the obama administration changing the breast cancer screening requirement from yearly to every 4 years. Sounds like a war on women to me.



Just ask Sarah Palin or Michelle Bachman, or Christine O'Donnell if there is a democrat war on conservative women.



It was GW Bush and the War in Iraq that changed the way women were treated in the middle east,,,Now women can get educated and jobs, and a much better life then before the Iraq war.



So it can be said GWB has done more for women's rights around the world then any president in history.



Now let's be fair here,,,, Akin was correct when he implied not all rapes are legitimate.



Just ask the Duke LaCrosse Team.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/woman-accused-d…



Women Falsely Accuses Man of Rape

http://www.wtnh.com/dpp/news/crime/cops-…



Man Falsely Accused of Rape

http://www.komonews.com/news/national/79…



Democrat War On Conservative Women

http://ameretics.com/index.php/56-women/70-the-real-war-on-women?showall=&limitstart=



MSNBC Host Calls Laura Ingram a Slut

http://www.politico.com/blogs/onmedia/0511/MSNBC_suspends_Schultz_for_calling_Ingraham_a_slut.html

Answer 7

Do you not understand the difference between fighting to pass laws which restrict women's rights (republicans) and insulting television personalities for the things they say?

Answer 8

You can disagree with a woman without being anti-woman. Just as you can disagree with Obama without being racist.



Sarah Palin represents the very worst of the Republican Party--ideology before pragmatism, facts don't matter, ignorance beats understanding. Like GW Bush, she carefully avoids unscripted interviews because she can't answer questions! I would oppose her no matter which sex she was. She even dropped out of electoral politics altogether because she couldn't answer questions!



Ann Coulter she sees her job as being to get attention through making totally outrageous statements that draw criticism. Then she holds them up to her audience and says 'See how they hate us?' Bill O'Reilly does the same thing, and I despise him just as much. 8^) Coulter has never offered one genuine significant insight, she really just repeats established GOP rhetoric. Her gender has nothing to do with it.

Answer 9

Those women are insane. It’s not that they’re women; they’re just insane liars is all. No different than many of the extremists in the right-wing.

Answer 10

They also claim to be the great champions of African Americans rights, that is until one of them dares to move off the plantation, then all bets are off. Uncle Tom is one of the milder names they get called then. Hypocrisy is one of the main characteristics of libs.

Answer 11

THE VAST, VAST, VAST, VAST majority of the time... they call those people idiots... because they are idiots... and it has nothing to do with the sex...



with the exception of Hillary...



notice you don't mention any actual LEGISLATION... which is where the con war on women is very visible... like fighting against equal pay bills, vaginal ultrasounds, equal coverage by health insurance...



all you have are "random names" that someone supposedly called those women?



you bring "STORIES" and I bring facts... and that's another day talking to cons on YA

Answer 12

We support their rights, just not their insanity.

Answer 13

Liberals aren't for rights, they are for obedience.

Answer 14

Democrats TOLERATE women, but ONLY women who act like Democrat Party PETS and not like actual human beings.

All* Democrats keep proving they want all other women crushed like vermin.



*Yes, that includes 100% of Democrat WOMEN

Answer 15

Google 'hypocritical liars' + 'liberals'.

Answer 16

Their definition of a woman is a slut like Wendy Davis or a lesbian like Rachel Maddow.

Answer 17

So, equal rights for women - in your mind - equates to being immune to critique?



That makes sense... how?

Answer 18

This makes no sense.



they are disagreeing with stupid and crazy women who are against womens rights.

Answer 19

liberals aren't for women's rights. that proganda the uneducated has fed you. liberals are pro communism.

Answer 20

They are for Liberal women's rights that's all folks. I find it hysterically funny when someone on Y/A calls Sarah Plain Stupid, a Former Governor and a multi-millionaire is so stupid she doesn't spend her time on Y/A calling people names.

Answer 21

You can be in favor of women's rights... and not be in favor of blatant stupidity. These things are not mutually exclusive.

Answer 22

BECAUSE they hate women too.

Answer 23

they are morons with big mouths