anonymous
2009-07-02 17:06:21 UTC
I have read some news in media that Shiv Sena BJP combined are protesting against naming this bridge as Rajiv Gandhi Setu. Let me first of all explain there objection. There objection is not against Rajiv Gandhi, but there objection is against the origin of Rajiv Gandhi because he is non-Marathi. And there itself I have objection. Rajiv Gandhi was a Nation Leader, he was above Marathi, Gujarati, Bihari, Tamil or any other regional politics. I am fail to understand why is he dragged into this dirty regional politics? I clearly can feel that this question is being raised by Shiv Sena to only counter MNS pro-Marathi issues.
There were some concerns in the previous about Rajiv Gandhi, as if what did he do for the Nation. I was little surprised to read those comments as well as some answers. Let me answer tell you what Rajiv Gandhi did in 5 years.
1. Educcation: Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya System: There are approximately 557 JNVs across India as of now. They offer free education to all students who get selected through the admission process which includes an All India Entrance Exam, held at district level. Talented students from each district are selected through an All India Level Entrance Exam conducted each year by CBSE and are given admission to 6th standard/class in the JNVs of respective districts. Till 1998, the Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya Selection Test (JNVST) was conducted by the Central Board of Secondary Education. The test is largely non-verbal and objective in nature and is designed to prevent any disadvantage to children from rural areas. Now admissions are also taken in Class IX and XI. During academic year 2008-09 admissions will be allowed in Class VIII. These admissions are conducted through an objective and descriptive test containing questions on English, Mathematics, Science, & Social Sciences. This "Lateral Entry" system is devised to fill the vacancies that arise due to withdrawal of admissions of the children who are admitted in class VI. And 80% of these admissions are reserved for rural students and 20% for urban.
In 1986, Rajiv Gandhi announced a "national education policy" to modernize and expand higher education programs across India.
2. Telecommunication: Rajiv Gandhi is the one who brought revolution in the field of telecommunications in India. He not only started Public Call Office (PCO), that brought telephones in every home at affordable rate. Next he started STD and ISD that really made telephones affordable for general public. To make this possible, he brought Satyanarayan Gangaram Pitroda or Sam Pitroda to India from Chicago and started Center for Development of Telematics or C-DOT. Rajiv Gandhi, was the one who started Mahanagar Telephones Nigam LTD or MTNL and I don't have to describe that because all Indians know about that. Computer and Computer education both were brought to India by Mr. Gandhi.
3. Economics: The economic policies adopted by Rajiv Gandhi were different from his precursors like Indira Gandhi and Jawaharlal Nehru. Going, against the traditional socialism, Rajiv Gandhi decided to improve the bilateral relationships with the United States of America and subsequently expanded the economic and scientific cooperation with it. A revived foreign policy, emphasizing on the economic liberalization and information and technology moved India closer to the West.
His introductory measures to reduce the "Red Tapism" and allow business house to set up their establishments was remarkable.
Even lacking experience and only one term, major problems such as Punjab, and stabbing on the back by his colleagues such as Arun Nehru, V P Singh etc, if he has so many great achievements, he deserves our respects.
I do agree that there were some problems with his this one terms, and which prime minister did not have problems?
Why did Shiv Sena or BJP did not come up with a name before this Bridge was named as Rajiv Gandhi Setu?
Actually I personally have strong opposition against Savarkar's name, due to MANY reasons, but one that I would like to mention is this one:
This name is proposed to promote a regional division, and Mumbai does not belong to only Marathi. If Mumbai is Mumbai that is because of hard work of Indians and money invested by entire India. And the reason for proposing this name is not made up by me but given by the protesters themselves.
Why didn't BJP propose propose Pt Deendayal Upadhyaya or Dr. Shyamapradad Mookarjee and in particular Dr. Mookarjee?
Did Shiv Sena BJP oppose Mayawati, Kashiram's stetue in Lakhnow?
Are we protesting only because we want to protest or we are really protesting against an issue?