Ken Starr, the prosecutor of Clinton gave more contributions to Clinton this year than repubs. guilty conscien
2007-08-01 08:52:23 UTC
Ken Starr's law firm has given more contributions to Clinton Pres. campaign than any other, even tho he's a known Republican. Is this a case of Guilty conscience for his frivolous accusations against her husband?
Seven answers:
anya_mystica
2007-08-01 09:04:14 UTC
The whole Clinton thing was a dog and pony show. Notice more rich GOP support Hillary, even Rupert Murdock. Hillary means more of the same so of course Ken Star's law firm supports her. The Clinton's are part of the Bush crime family. She is a neocon.
2007-08-01 16:01:12 UTC
He's not the one giving the contributions it's the other lawyers and his firm. They are independent professionals and can support whoever they want. The real irony would be if Starr himself supported Democrats, but that's never going to happen.
netjr
2007-08-01 15:57:04 UTC
Your heading is quite misleading (typical left wing spin I suspect) in that Ken Starr himself did not give more to the Clintons his law firm did....law firms give lots more to evil manipulative Democrats then they do good hearted law abiding Republicans...
Dull Jon
2007-08-01 15:56:56 UTC
No, Ken Starr is not an idiot and he's backing the candidate he feels is right. What her husband did is not what she did.
2007-08-01 20:48:02 UTC
perhaps it's just a case of wanting to back a "hopeful" candidate-and a woman-and the jilted wife of our former President and known drug/sex abuser./....some people just want to be a "part" of anything that will draw them attention they would not necessarily get if left to their own devices......
Max R Waller
2007-08-01 15:57:47 UTC
Guilty conscience.
2007-08-01 15:57:12 UTC
Perhaps he's trying to buy his way into heaven... he's no spring chicken any more.
ⓘ
This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.