Question:
Why NCERT books still teach political doctrine called Aryan-Invasion theory to naive school children?
^_^
2010-05-14 00:33:06 UTC
Primary students are gullible and they tend to believe whatever taught to them and books approved by govt. are generally considered authentic source. Therefore teaching such a rubbish theory should be avoided by the government.

Instead of teaching them how to becme an "Arya", govt. is trying to teach them co*k and bully story of Aryan Invasion!





First of all Aryan is not a race. No where in the vedas and other ancient Indian text is the terms Aryan used to refer to a race!

How can then Aryans and Dravidians be two separate races? If Aryans had invaded India then why are Dravidians following the same customs and religion as aryans. How do they speak languages which originated from the same parental language, viz. sanskrit?

Why dont any dravidian folk lore or ancient texts or sayings or stories or epics exist which talk about the so called Aryan invasion? Also why do the vedic texts talk about locations in South India? The Ramayana, Mahabharatha all talk about South Indian locations even below and beyond the main land of India into the Indian ocean like Srilanka! If Aryans were from europe and if they invaded North India and pushed local people down to South India, where did these locations come from?

There is no mention of any location outside the mainland of India in any of the vedic texts! If aryans came from Europe, then why havent the so called aryans mentioned any of the european locations in any of the vedic or related texts? The farthest location away from India towards the west mentioned in the vedas is Kadhahar of present day Afghanistan, which was called Gandhar in the vedic texts and was said to be the kingdom of Shakuni.

Why haven’t any of the texts mentioned about their European locations? Why is there no vedic text which talks about migration from Europe? None of the vedic texts talk about rivers outside India! Everybody knows that rivers were the major sources of water for all ancient civilizations and so all ancient civilizations were centered around the world’s major rivers. Why is there no mention of any European river or a river outside India anywhere in the vedic texts? Wouldn’t a race mention something or the other about its native place in at least one of its texts?


River Saraswati proves to be a death blow to the Aryan Invasion theory. According to the Aryan Invasion theory the aryans who invaded India in around 1500 BC settled on the banks of Indus or Sindhu river in North India.

Recent satellite images and geological excavations have proved the existence of a ancient river in North India, with exactly the same features of river Saraswati described in the vedas and Mahabharatha! Today Saraswati is a dried up river today. Before Saraswati dried up, the present Rajasthan was a lush green area!

Now what does Saraswati river have to say about the Aryan Invastion theory of 1500 BC? Well, the geological excavations give a date of about 4000 BC for the drying up of Saraswati river !
Six answers:
anonymous
2010-05-14 00:49:45 UTC
I MUST CORRECT YOU!



NOW THEY CALL IT THE "ARYAN MIGRATION" THEORY.. THE SAME SH*T PACKED NEW;)



http://www.hindubooks.org/david_frawley/myth_aryan_invasion/



THANKS TO THE WESTER HISTORIANS AND INDOLOGISTS WE HAVE A WRONG IMAGE OF THE ARYANS!



IF THE ARYANS INVADED OR MIGRATED TO INDIA WHY DONT WE FIND ANYTHING CULTURALLY SIMILAR ELSE WHERE IN THE WORLD!?!



WHY DONT THE VEDAS MENTION A "HOMELAND" IN EUROPE, RUSSIA OR ELSE WHERE IF THEY CAME FROM THERE!?!



ITS NOT ABOUT A RACE RATHER ABOUT CULTURE... THE INDUS-SARASWATI CULTURE.



THE WORD ARYAN HAS ITS ORIGIN IN SANSKRIT, MAX MÜLLER TOOK THE WORD FROM THE VEDAS, THE AUTHORS OF THE VEDAS CALLED THEMSELVES "ARYA" WHICH MEANS "NOBLE". THEY LIVE IN THE AREA WHICH MAKES TODAYS INDIA, IRAN,AFGHANISTAN AND PAKISTAN.



DEFINITIONS:

the authoritative Sanskrit lexicon (c. 450 AD), the famous Amarakosa gives the following definition:

mahakula kulinarya sabhya sajjana sadhavah

An Arya is one who hails from a noble family, of gentle behavior and demeanor, good-natured and of righteous conduct



And the great epic Ramayana has a singularly eloquent expression describing Lord Rama as:

arya sarva samascaiva sadaiva priyadarsanah

Arya, who worked for the equality of all and was dear to everyone.



The Rigveda also uses the word Arya something like thirty six times, but never to mean a race.



DOES THESE DEFENTIONS REFLECT THE SO CALLED "ARYANS " FROM THE WEST?

THEY WERE NO BARBARIANS AS THE WESTERN "ARYANS" SAY... SEE ALL THOSE CONTRIBUTIONS OF THE ARYANS AND THEIR SUCCESSORS IN SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY, ASTRONOMY, MEDICINE ETC... CAN THAT BE FROM BARBARIANS?

LIKE CHARAKA AND SUSHRUTA IN MEDICINE, SURGERY OR ARYABHATTA IN MATHS AND ASTRONOMY!

THERE ARE STILL NO SCIENTIFIC PROOFS FOR ALL THOSE "ARYAN THEORIES" OF THE WEST...



WE SHOULD STOP MISUSING AND INSULTING THE NAME OF THE ANCESTORS OF THOSE NATION.



THE ARYAN-DRAVIDIAN "THEORY" WAS INTRODUCED BY THE BRITISH FOR THE COLONIAL EXPLOITATION.

Recent studies of the distribution of alleles on the Y chromosome microsatellite DNA, and mitochondrial DNA in India have cast overwhelmingly strong doubt for a biological Dravidian "race" distinct from non-Dravidians in the Indian subcontinent. The only distinct ethnic groups present in South Asia, according to genetic analysis, are the Balochi, Brahui, Burusho, Hazara, Kalash, Pathan and Sindhi peoples, the vast majority of whom are found in today's Pakistan.



ACCORDING TO THE LATEST SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE THE FORFATHERS OF THE HOMO SAPIENS (US HUMANS), THE HOMO ERECTUS ORIGINATED IN AFRICA!

SO WE ALL ARE ACTUALLY AFRICANS... BUT NOT BLACK!?!

AND SADLY THE CURRENT CONDITION OF OUR "HOMELAND" IS A HUMANITARIAN DISASTER!



WHO SAID ARYANS WERE "WHITE-BLOND-BLUE EYED"?

RIGHT HITLER AND WE BELIVE SOMEONE LIKE HIM!?!
India Inc.
2010-05-14 02:22:30 UTC
Well sad enough for the communal morons in India, the Aryan invasion theory is 100% correct. The land now known as India and the Indus Valley civilization originally belonged to the Dravidians. The Aryans were sort of barbarians who invaded the land from Persia (Iran) and drove the Dravidians far south.



They portrayed themselves as Devas (gods) and the Dravidians as Asurs (demons). Ram was an Aryan king who defeated Ravan the Dravidian king, with the help of monkeys (vanars) to abduct Sita (originally Ravan's daughter). After defeating Ravan he installed his puppet Vibhishan in Lanka as king.



Most of north Indians today are from the Aryan tribe. We can draw many parallels between Iranian Ahmedinijad abusing the American and our north Indian brahmin party abusing the not-so-north indians (Tharoor / Raj Thakarey / Karunanidhi etc.). We can see their arrogance everywhere; someone called the Yadavs 'dogs'.



Yesterday's TV report captured on cam Karnataka's pink chaddi man agreeing to organize riots for Rs. 66 lakhs, in the name of protecting Hindus. What a shame! So if invaders are to leave India, we need to start from the Aryans.



The question was a self-goal!



The Aftermath Inc.
NO
2010-05-14 10:09:34 UTC
NCERT books are fake with respect to these issues, depending on the education minister.

greek like alexander, tartars like chengis khan, gori,gazni like mohamedans, dutch, french,spanish,english like christians are all invaders, by which term, they explain their own conduct of destruction of hindus, their temples and cultures in hindian soil; so, when these rougues invaded, there were edifices and culture to be destroyed by the invaders; but, if aryans are invaders, there is no evidence of any destruction of temples , culture etc, and in fact every thing was the same throughout india; if aryans are invading barbarians, as foulmouthed by 'aftermath', from where the invaders from greek to christians had temples and culture to be destroyed?
V
2010-05-14 12:17:17 UTC
History if it can be called that, in India is written by Marxists of JNU and the Muslim and Christian appeasement party Congress. They will write whatever they want regardless of the truth to indoctrinate generations to come for their political aims.
anonymous
2010-05-15 05:20:15 UTC
It is true that it was projected like that because Britishers at that time wanted to alienate Indians from their freedom struggle.



Nowdays, it is further used be sh*t eating specimen like ap and aftermath inc. to score points.
anuragada poojaari(ap)
2010-05-14 07:20:16 UTC
you want to open a can of worms?.bjp govt has done more than anyother government to lie in textbooks..ha..gujarat textbooks heil hitler as a hero...dont go there man..you are going to get hurt if you go there


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...