Will the Internet end appeasement by the liberals and democrats?

Question

75 years ago appeasers allowed Nazi Germany to prepare for war by thwarting efforts by conservatives like Churchill from forcing Hitler to halt his military buildup. The appeasers did nothing to stop Germany's buildup, even though the evidence of imminent danger was right in front of them, for many years:

-In 1923 Hitler publishes Mien Kampf which clearly states that Germany needed to go to war for “lebensraum” -- and Aryans must be the masters of Europe.

-6/15/05 BBC: “By 1939 Mien Kampf had sold 5,200,000 copies and had been translated into 11 languages. It was provided as a school textbook after Hitler came to power in 1933 and was given to all German newlyweds.”

-1930 Germans vote for the Nazi Party making it the second most popular.

-8/20/1933 New York Times, Berlin: “Eighty-nine and nine-tenths per cent of the German voters endorsed in yesterday's plebiscite Chancellor Hitler's assumption of greater power than has been possessed by any other ruler in modern times.”

-1933 Hitler becomes Chancellor, quits League of Nations

-1935 Hitler declares military conscription and Germans begin preparing for war.

-1936 Germans seize the Rhineland.

-1938 Germans seize Austria and Czechoslovakia.

-1938 September: Appeaser Prime Minister Chamberlain negotiates peace with Hitler at Munich: “…peace in our time.”

1939-1945: Germans plunge the world into another World War, the second war within 20 years. 60 million people are killed.

Today’s appeasers seem to be repeating Chamberlains's approach to imminent threats, but are having a difficult time convincing us that Islamic extremists don’t pose a deadly threat to the West -- they even call terrorism "manmade disasters" rather than "Muslim extremist terrorism." But we, unlike the Europeans of 75 years ago, have the Internet (which didn’t exist a generation ago!) to research what the evidence is.

It’s a tedious process but well worth the time to learn who is involved in the world’s civil wars:
Bing/Google search “civil wars in the world” then research each individual civil war and you will find that 90% of them involve one combatant-religion, Islam. Muslim extremists fight in China, Russia, Bosnia, Cyprus, Macedonia, Israel, Pakistan, India, Indonesia-Ambon & Halmarhera, Côte d'Ivoire, Kashmir, Kosovo, Bosnia, Kurdistan, Kirghizia, Nigeria, Philippines, Somalia, Turkey, Chechnya, Sudan, Yemen, Thailand, Uganda, Azerbaijan, Bangladesh and East Timor.

-3/11/10 Deutsche Presse, Thailand: Muslim separatists have caused 4,000 people to die in clashes, bombings, revenge killings and beheadings in the troubled region, which borders Malaysia. Of the 300,000 Thai Buddhists who lived in the region, 70,000 have left since Muslims started the civil war in 2004.
-8/20/10 AsiaNews, Kashmir: Extremist Muslims are demanding Sikhs convert or leave.
-8/23/10 Reuters: Since 2004 Muslim extremists have killed 4,000 Buddhists in southern Thailand, which they are claiming as Muslim homelands.
-10/4/11 AFP news, Philippines: Muslims are waging civil war to make a Muslim homeland in Mindanao causing the deaths of an estimated 150,000 people over more than four decades.

As a result of such knowledge the masses are alert to the threat, notwithstanding the appeasers and multicultural apologists:

A Pew Research poll taken in June of 2006:
-To the question of concern about the rise of Islamic extremism in your country? Percent who are concerned: US 72%; UK, France, Germany, Russia 74 to 82%.

A Le Parisien poll in February 2010: 54% believe Islam is anti-Western Culture.

Would WW2 have happened if Europeans had the Internet to learn that Germany was violating every facet of the Versailles Treaty, for many years, thus rendering the appeasers not credible -- even a danger to the peace?

Answer 1

The world knew what Germany was doing, they just didn't care until it affected them.

Answer 2

Not all Republicans are Conservative and not all Democrats are Liberals. We as a nation have got to appear at what our legislators are alternatively of if they've a R or a D by means of their name. The essential intent Conservatives are upset after the final election is that they didn't have a alternative. McCain is a liberal and Obama is a socialist. There was once now not a Conservative to vote for. The Democrats rigged the republican important in order that they would get the fellow they could beat the simplest. I'm a Conservative now not a republican, no longer a Democrat. I will vote for either occasion if they've a Conservative candidate. But on your query. There was political bickering considering the colonies declared Independence from England and there shall be unless time ends.

Answer 3

All speech must be "free" of words which damage the collective, Comrade.

Answer 4

This question reminds me of the time Obama appeased Osama bin Laden.

Answer 5

Good monologue.