Question:
Why is the government still giving money to Katrina victims?
Brian
2009-06-03 12:49:23 UTC
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/02/AR2009060203897.html?g=0

Personally, I would do anything in my power to help them out by myself. But I cannot stand that, because they didn't have enough insurance, I have to use my taxpayer money that could go to other things!

I know this may sound insensitive, but I'm all for helping out the poor as much as we can, but not this much!

Thanks in advance to all answerers.
23 answers:
Sgt Red
2009-06-03 12:56:39 UTC
These people were on welfare before Katrina and they always will be. Our politicians like welfare states because the Democrats can always count on their votes.
jaquir
2016-10-06 13:04:06 UTC
i actually can't say how lots my spouse and that i gave as that is nonetheless being totaled because of the fact various the victims are nonetheless being given counsel with the aid of our tax money. yet, you enhance Katrina and that activates a query; Why is it that the finished Gulf Coast that fluctuate into struck via Katrina has, or is, rebuilding without a whimper and New Orleans is the finished tale? Waveland, long sea coast, and previous Christian, Mississippi have been actually blown away. Biloxi and Gulfport has severe injury and absence of existence exchange into heavy in all those areas, yet we pay attention in basic terms approximately New Orleans. Wait, i think of I basically spoke back my own question.... that is approximately race, isn't it....
letfreedomring
2009-06-03 13:03:47 UTC
This is one of the smartest things Obama has done. This is a win win situation.



I am not sure people have really been thinking if they are complaining about this.



These homes have been used and abused for several years now.



They started depreciation as soon as they left the lot.

As long as the government owns them the government has to fix them.



It looks to me like Obama wants to get rid of more dept. They were paid for years back and they are still costing us. If we sell them for 5.00 then they are off of our hands and the new owners can get them fixed when something breaks.
?
2009-06-03 12:54:03 UTC
Becuase a 7-year contract was signed with Katrina after seeing Apocolyptico
2009-06-03 12:59:52 UTC
There are a number of assumptions in your post that may or may not be true.



For example, quite a large number of those Katrina victims DID have insurance. But there were so many claims that a number of insurance companies just said they are not going to pay any more, and were willing to deal with the lawsuits in hopes they could beat it in court. They knew they could not afford to cover it outside of court.



Secondly, quite a large number BELIEVED they had insurance that covered flood damage. This generally stems from attempts to confuse people into buying more insurance than they need by the insurance companies, who put all kinds of things in legalese and fine print so they can get out of paying for a whole bunch of things later.



And then there were a number of people there who wanted to leave, but could not afford to do so. This is a major part of that whole fight that occurred that day--who was supposed to authorize the evacuations and National Guard and all that.



I would blame the Governor and Mayor Ray Nagin, who were most responsible for the National Guard and evacuations, respectively.











However, you do have a point and the federal government also failed them. It turns out that a large number of other countries were quite ready to help us when Katrina happened.



Many countries sent money, totaling over $400 billion, to help Katrina victims. Even China was among these.



Other countries that could not afford to send money instead chose to send food and medical supplies; estimated worth of those food and supplies being about $100 billion. Even Iran was among these.



And Greece sent two of its largest cruise ships, capable of handling 1200 families EACH.







What happened to all of this? The Bush Adminstration refused it. ALL OF IT. We quite literally could have helped every single person there without spending a dime.
2009-06-03 12:56:23 UTC
These people were receiving government funds far before Katrina and will be receiving them long after you are gone. Unless we all run out because BO got it all and gave it to Big Windy.
2009-06-03 12:59:49 UTC
The truth is those people are idiots and didn't have insurance. Funny how you never hear about Government helping out fire victims in Southern Cali.....oh....wait...those people aren't idiots and had insurance.
∙ ∙•∙•AvGass•∙•∙ ∙
2009-06-03 13:26:11 UTC
B/c we're idiots. I also think a lot of it has to do with some weird sense of obligation on the US's part.
Bobby7
2009-06-03 12:56:05 UTC
Let's see an ENTIRE AMERICAN CITY is virtually DESTROYED... The rebuilding process has been ridiculously SLOW.... What can the people do?





Well many of these people DID HAVE INSURANCE... but the INSURANCE companies DENIED THEIR CLAIMS!!!!



There is actually NO BETTER CAUSE for my taxpayer dollars to go to... than helping people STAY ALIVE after a the WORST natural disaster in the history of the country!!!!!!!
2009-06-03 12:53:32 UTC
Just look at the difference between the flood victims in New Orleans and the flood victims in North Dakota. Did they need any trailers, food, money, debit cards to buy designer purses, looting, stealing, crime? Nope. There's your answer. One group has their hand out and nothing is every enough. The other group has their hand out helping each other.
2009-06-03 13:02:39 UTC
Because that's how politicians get and maintain power. This isn't about helping anybody except helping Democrats stay in power.
2009-06-03 12:59:28 UTC
Because if they didn't, they might be accused of "racism". And nobody wants to be accused of racism, so of course they have to bend over backwards and keep paying "protection" money. Protection from who? Liberal black groups.
?
2009-06-03 12:55:39 UTC
I mean come on it's only fair.I'm in houston and Ike tore us up pretty bad and we don't need Fema anymore.Then Katrina victims were welcomed here and then are murder rate goes up 800%.Stop helping people who will not help themselves.
2009-06-03 12:56:11 UTC
Morbo J is an idiot. Obviously only a terrorist would do that.
Chelsea
2009-06-03 12:56:40 UTC
Because Hurricane Katrina was a disaster on a massive level. People are still homeless, and rummaging through the debris for remains of their lives that they had to completely abandon due to this disaster.

Why wouldn't we give them assistance? We spent trillions of dollars going to war for no reason, and you ask why we are sending assistance to victims of a horrific experience within our own nation? That is something I find extremely sad.
Sean
2009-06-03 12:52:39 UTC
They realize that they've created a class of welfare recipients that can never make it on their own, so they have to support them forever.
Eugene
2009-06-03 12:59:27 UTC
So people would stop begging.







Help me out?

https://answersrip.com/question/index?qid=20090603125236AAVuqcw
SCRAPPY
2009-06-03 12:57:27 UTC
Most did not get the money allocated. Bush made sure it never left the coffers.

Many homes were never rebuilt
2009-06-03 12:52:00 UTC
Votes.
brown9500v4
2009-06-03 12:57:45 UTC
I thought Bobby Jindal, the great Republican hope, fixed all of that .
2009-06-03 12:53:38 UTC
Liberal Guilt
Morbo J
2009-06-03 12:55:10 UTC
Okay, so I'll come blow your house to pieces, destroy your car, and make your family disappear.

Would you ask for government help?
2009-06-03 12:53:07 UTC
Fine, when a natural disaster hits you I won't help you out.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...