As algorithms advance, will video evidence or even photographs eventually become inadmissible in court?

Question

https://www.wired.com/story/future-of-artificial-intelligence-2018/

Answer 1

Seeing as to what happened to Roy Moore, and now other people. Evidence and proof of any kind is unnecessary.

Answer 2

The actual waveforms the vodeo consists of can be analyzed. My guess is it'll be a while before that sort of data "looks" like the real thing. I suppose a program could insert artifacts and irregularities to make it look like something other then what a computer spit out. It's not just about having a video, but how it was recorded, or what recorded it, and other factors could be taken into account. It's probably impossible to mimic a bullet fired from a different gun. Comparing apples and oranges I guess. But it'll be some time decades perhaps before a fake video is teuly convincing.

Answer 3

what makes you think DNA cannot be planted or manipulated.