Question:
do you think 9/11 was an inside job? 10 points?
Emily S
2009-02-08 13:07:53 UTC
do you think 9/11 was an inside job done by bush to finish off what his father started?
only people who believe 9/11 was an inside job answer..can you please explain your answer....
44 answers:
The Patriot
2009-02-09 04:56:22 UTC
No
anonymous
2016-10-16 10:55:24 UTC
interior the airborne dirt and dust from WTC thats all over the city there's a chemical it relatively is purely produced by thermine and that's what permit the homes freefall to the floor.formed thermine expenditures have been used. There are 10 regulations of reason for controlled demolition and the WTC matched all 10. those are info which you will come across honestly on the internet. they don't come from 'some guy' that works for the government. yet a conglomerate of exact nicely common and respected boffins of their container. Hailing from universities and laboratories international extensive. Heads of state substitute yet they're purely the puppets. the actual government under no circumstances variations. this is ordinary for heads of state to commence a warfare on purpose. the U. S. funded the two factors of WW2 AND Vietnam. This replaced into shown in financial corporation information and paper trails in the previous 1980 and introduced to the international by using books.
magnito_delfrago
2009-02-08 15:40:53 UTC
I doubt Bush had much to do with it, I suspect that he couldn't tie his own shoe laces.

I rather suspect Rumsfeld,Daddy Bush,and Cheney, since he ordered the NORAD stand down of the plane heading to strike the Pentagon according to Norman Mineta.



The US Administration already was planning on attacking Afghanistan pre September 11.



Silverstein takes on a 99 year lease on the WTC complex and acquires an insurance policy including a clause that would prove extremely valuable: in the event of a terrorist attack, the partnership could collect the insured value of the property, and be released from their obligations under the 99-year lease. (Which he got compensated for twice because each plane counted as a separate attack)



The put options put on american airlines stock before the attack happened.



The fact that the towers were pulverised with those massive clouds chasing people down the street. The pools of molten metal found at ground zero with the smouldering rouble that lasted for weeks.



Rumsfeld admits the 2.3 Trillion dollars unaccounted for by the Pentagon defence budget.
Clive Reborn
2009-02-08 14:43:51 UTC
I analyse such events by by asking two questions:



1. Was the outcome reasonably predictable?

2. I the answer to the first question is 'yes' then I ask who gained from an event.



Clearly neither Islam nor any Arab countries or organisations benefited from the destruction of the twin towers.

The US government took the opportunity to introduce much oppressive domestic legislation that would otherwise have been quite unacceptable.

Israel suddenly became more strategically important to the US and a blind eye was turned towards their human rights violations.

The US invaded Afghanistan which set the stage for the pillaging of Iraq.



The 'house of cards' collapse of the twin towers was unexpected in a building constructed on a steel frame. One would expect a substantial portion of the steel frame to remain in place when the infill collapses through the floors. The use of thermite would have caused the buildings to collapse as they did without producing any explosions.
anonymous
2009-02-08 20:28:01 UTC
People who think that it was are labbeled as conspirory theorists by the government and mainstream media.



You can see how effectife this brainwashing is in the programmed responses to your answer.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MeybdEuf16A

(9/11 Facts)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vAH3AeFy0SY

(Most popular you tube video of politician’s lying)



The Government orchastrated the attacks on their own people as a false flag opperation to blame it on a country they wish to invade. (Hitler did this FACT)



People can google 'OPERATION NORTHWOODS' a classified government document showing plans to attack their own people and blame it on Cuba. The government new about the attack on Pearl Harbour well before it happened.

WATCH - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8tKVDvl1WG4



The government did it for two reasons:

1) To use it as an excuse to invade Iraq and control the oil once again.

2) To scare people into giving up their freedom and liberty for security by accepting I.D. cards, thunb prints, eye scans and eventually microchipped like a dog.

WATCH - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-whcDGyEpIo



Here is a video of the BBC reporting the collapse of the 3d tower (no plane hit it) 20 MINUTES BEFORE IT COLLAPSED!!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p23FIcOkO30





Those who refuse to think outside the proverbial ‘box’ are imprisoned in it; and destined to be berried in it”



Except for the two planes hitting the WTC towers, try to think of an ‘official’ position on 9/11 which has turned up as fact.



The FBI’s Robert Mueller cited the fact that no documentation linked Al Qaeda to 9/11. Later phoney Al Qaeda ‘assertions’ did not hold up to scrutiny.



There is no documented record of the purported 9/11 terrorists making any plane reservations. There is no ‘record’ locator, complete with details.



There is no documented record of the purported 9/11 terrorists buying or using tickets (I.D’s required).



There is no hard copy of a printed ticked.



There is no record of the purported 9/11 on any of the passenger’s manifests, with all legitimate passengers being accounted for.



There is no record of the purported 9/11 in the autopsies.



There is not so much as a suggestion that the purported 9/11 terrorists had the needed pilot licence but rather the contrary.



At least seven of the purported terrorists are still alive and well, and have even been interviewed by the BBC.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7ixuf236Dk



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3qTkxse8gFY

(Bush/CIA 9/11)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fbgd-mBdSjQ

(9/11 and troops)



bY THE WAY 7/7 WAS AN INSIDE JOB TOO.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7y6U_17jysQ

(London Bombings)



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=enWDthX7SFU

(CIA World war 3)
anonymous
2009-02-09 03:24:07 UTC
it was a mossad job



911missinglinks.com





There may be a plan to stage a false flag nuclear attack and to instigate martial law.





'The Daily telegraph website has been featuring a work of art called Blackjack: A slideshow depicting nuclear explosions throughout England and the U.S. followed by the inevitable introduction of Marial Law...The Daily telegraph website has been featuring a "work of art" called Blackjack: A slideshow depicting nuclear explosions throughout England and the U.S. followed by the inevitable introduction of Martial Law................ The Telegraph has long been presumed to have close links with British intelligence agencies. Their former Director was a Rothschild.'



http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=GB&v=1BYqhk-Rbwo





This what some believe is what is known as 'predictive conditioning' similar to the7 May 2004 Panorama "London under Attack" proggramme



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nY2NXPl625A&feature=PlayList&p=C731A56690FC93D9&playnext=1&index=21





which predicted a scenario to the official account of the events of the MI6/Mossad false flag attack of 7/7/05 to condition the masses to accept the offical account of the event when they stage it.
L.T.M.
2009-02-08 14:33:17 UTC
I believe it was a conspiracy of incompetence and political correctness combined with a an apathetic and distracted public.



edit: After reading 'some' of these answers I should have said apathetic and Looney public.
n.barrett93
2009-02-08 14:27:26 UTC
Yes.



A leading physicist (don't know the name, but it's on a video called zeitgeist on youtube) said that a plane crashing into a skryscraper would not cause the floors to collapse. Think about it. how could one admiteddly big impact at the top of a building cause the floors to collapse down onto each other? The only thing that could have caused the floors to collapse is explosives attached to every floor of the building. The government forces checked the remains afterwards and there were no traces of explosives, or so they said.



Also, as the floors were collapsing one-by-one floor 8 started to collapse before floor 9 (or somewhere around the bottom of the building) which confirms that explosives were used in bringing down the twin towers.





President Bush had a meeting with Osama Bin Laden's brother on the morning of the attacks. Bit suspicious? You might say that's bullshit but it's not. Watch the video zeitgeist on youtube (ignore the first 25 mins or so, that focusses on religion) and then follow the link to their website where you can see all the sources used.



9/11 gave Bush greater control over the Americanc people. Headlines like "Terrorists" and "bombings" scared people into voting for him because they thought they needed a forceful leader to protect them. Do you really think he would've beaten Kerry in 2005 if it wasn't for his tough stance on terrorism? 9/11 was all planned.



The next few paragraphs are not exactly concerning 9/11, but they are related.



Irap had no weapons of mass destruction, which was Bush's justicification for going to war. Of course Sadam was an awful, cruel and crazy leader but the US ignored the UN when they entered Iraq. It seems a different set of rules apply for America than every other country in the world. The US is allowed to go to war and ignore the UN's orders not to, undermining them in the process - but no other country is. The US is allowed to have weapons of mass destruction, but very few other countries are - and remind me, who are the only country ever to use a weapon of mass destruction? Bush was such a hypocrite.



Bush started a war with Irap to steal their oil. It's a very valuable resource and he was willing to

do anything to get it - including sacrificing the lives of thousands of people including his own soliders. They fought and died for oil - not America.





Of course, the war in Irap caused a lot of damage to all the buildings, particularly in Baghdad. Guess who got the lucrative contracts to re-build entire cities in Iraq? Bush's friends in the Republican Party who owned building companies, that's who. Not very fair, is it? They made loads money while ordinary Iraqis suffered.





In summary, Bush started his "war on terror" and ordered thw twin towers attack for several reasons:



1. To gain control over a fearful American people





2.To get oil





3.To give lucrative contracts to his mates in the Republican Party
anonymous
2009-02-08 13:23:48 UTC
Just the FACT that there is still so much doubt and speculation speaks volumes to the situation ! Sure, it was a "set up", but how it was actually pulled off is NOT the issue. It's what was not done at the time to prevent it, despite many warnings and exposed plots. Also, what has been allowed to be committed in our name as a response. The Bush admin was negligent at the very least, to being fully complicit in it's execution. Either he failed to protect us, or allowed it to happen, YOUR CHOICE ! Bush should be on trial,along with the rest of the creeps that let this happen ! Where is Bin Laden? Why didn't we ever really find out who mailed all that ANTHRAX ? There are more questions than answers, so thank our lucky stars that the Bush crime dynasty got voted out.

Maybe there is still a piece of unshredded evidence left behind from the Bush admin., that will clear this up?.....
anonymous
2009-02-08 13:13:14 UTC
No. Because i have used my brain. I have critical thinking, and research skills that conspiracy nutjobs lack.



For example. several hundred people would have been involved. It would have been impossible to keep that many people quiet. It would have taken years to plan (Bush was only in office 7 months). The govt could not keep watergate a secret.



The only part of 9/11 that was inside was that the planes exploded inside the buildings.





I have researched 9/11 thoroughly, and i am 110% sure that the conspiracy nutjobs are either complete idiots, or they trying to simply make money off of it. I have discovered their theories are either flat out lies or misinterpretations.





tm-Tower 7 collapsed because the north tower severly damaged it. They were broadcasting it all over the news that tower 7 was so heavily damaged that it may collapse.



That it why tower 7 collapsed.





Hog B- just because bin laden is a bad guy does not mean the entire family is in that same basket. Provide a RELIABLE source to prove that they were flown out. Even if that were true it was 8 days after 9/11, and they had bodyguard protection. Which means that they were flown out for safety reasons. There is no evidence that Bush had them flown out. It may very likely be the saudi royal family that had them flown out.





Hog- i block those that insult me directly.



You have insulted me therefore you get a block.



Steven Jones who is the "physicist" you speak of is a joke. He did not find thermite. He found traces of elements that happen to be thermite. Building like the WTC are like Chemical COcktails. You can find almost anything there. Iron is in paint and electronics. Manganees is in paint. Flourine is in freon etc. Other physicists and Structural engineers do not agree with his findings. They say his his sources are not reliable. Think about it. If thermite was used the buildings would have collapsed VERY soon after the planes impacted. This is where that critical thinking and research ability comes in handy. Imagine if you go to a store, and you go do your shopping. Then you go back to your car. There is a school bus in front of the store about 15 feet from you. What will happen if you reverse backwards and hit the bus? Do you think your car will bounce off or just come down and stop? The energy will get transfered from your car to the bus and will cause the bush to go all the way down and hit the store. that exactly what happened with the wtc. Except the 15 to 20 stories came down and hit each floor individually.
anonymous
2009-02-08 13:41:11 UTC
Wait, wait, let me get this straight.



You think that Bush wanted to attack Iraq, so they got a bunch of non-Iraqi Muslims, mostly from Saudi Arabia, who were directed by a terrorist organization in Afghanistan...



So where's the connection to Iraq?



And what was the benefit of going into Iraq?



What was the benefit of having to pass the Patriot Act?



It doesn't make a freaking lick of sense without a motive. Cui bono? Certainly not Bush.
Sub
2009-02-08 15:23:35 UTC
Yes
Charles C
2009-02-08 13:38:16 UTC
They tried to make it an inside job. But the planes wouldn't fit through the doors.
Bruce L
2009-02-08 13:20:05 UTC
No I don't and you can't tell me that I can't answer. If you would have said WHY do you think 9/11 was an inside job I wouldn't have had an answer. Shish some people are amazing!
anonymous
2009-02-08 16:39:45 UTC
No, it was years after years of real bad foreign policy from the US Government.
roger e
2009-02-08 17:55:37 UTC
lets see



a man hiding in a cave in Afghanistan and his motley mob take on the might and sophistication of the worlds only superpower

roflmao



The USA are a joke
anonymous
2009-02-08 13:11:50 UTC
No, you can't just hire a bunch of people to kill themselves in an aircraft for some conspiracy.



Usama also explained how it was all put together, and it correlated with what occurred and the people who did it.



There are to many flat out theory killers for that to have been an inside job. They would have had to work with Al Qieda, and good luck with that one.



And after all that, if it was an inside job it was Clinton who put all the pieces in place for the conspiracy to slip by unseen, you think Clinton worked with Bush on it?



That is just way to far out, and I don't think anyone who has half a clue and access to information who's pushing that crap even believes it for a second.
anonymous
2009-02-08 13:31:23 UTC
It was an false flag attack staged mainly the Israeli Mossad, as was the 7/7 and Madrid bombings in Europe.





They may be trying to stage a major nuclear false flag this summer perhaps.



one may have already failed in august 2007.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=GB&v=aLLyOzPXoQU



This will be presumably to try to bring martial law and some have suggested the NAU.



They are getting very desperate as the story is getting out much more than they ever expected. They may need to take drastic action soon.





edit:hog q is correct about Texas A&M class of 2010 AKA Conspiracy Buster etc he blocks truthers at random. He's lying when he says otherwise.
?
2009-02-08 13:20:50 UTC
There is a documentary called (9/11 confront the evidence) until a person has seen it I do not think that they are entitled to answer your question.This documentary was ,and may be still available on a site called Free movies and documentaries.
anonymous
2009-02-08 13:20:59 UTC
There is not a shred of evidence to support such a theory.



Some muslims flew a plane into a building and Americas enemies claimed responsibility.



Just how many people would need to keep such an event under their hats?



Have you ever considered the possiblity that the muslims engineered public doubt about their greatest foe?

For a people who live largely in the stoneage,they depend upon the power of propaganda.
Hilda
2009-02-08 13:14:51 UTC
No because I do not believe that anyone in our government was involved in planning or executing the attack. I do think, however, that members of our government and elected officials were complacent in their duties of analyzing intelligence information and acting accordingly.
pegminer
2009-02-08 14:56:35 UTC
No, that's a complete paranoid delusion. I didn't like W but that idea is complete bonkers.
porquemoi
2009-02-08 14:07:58 UTC
No. It disgusts me when I hear people accuse Bush of murdering Americans for his own political gain.
?
2009-02-08 13:13:01 UTC
No It was Bill Ayers he did the pentagon and the towers.
anonymous
2009-02-08 14:45:21 UTC
yes....the 9/11 conspiracy....is a government conspiracy lol now thats just funny
anonymous
2009-02-08 13:22:00 UTC
No his bosses to get the un-Patriotic act through.
anonymous
2009-02-08 13:12:18 UTC
lol...so ur asking if people THINK 9/11 was an inside job but then stating that only people who think it is can answer?



i think u've pretty much answered that urself .....
Anonymous Asker
2009-02-08 13:14:25 UTC
How would it have been kept secret? How many people would it take to stage such an event?



Wouldn't there be people in on it with guilty consciences confessing?
fleurdelyse25
2009-02-08 13:17:59 UTC
yes it was. Damn that Santa Claus, Tooth Fairy,Easter Bunny & that evil horde of Leprechauns!
honestamerican
2009-02-08 13:25:19 UTC
The fact this question keeps coming up says we need a new impartial investigation.
anonymous
2009-02-08 13:16:37 UTC
Who cares, They are puppets and we are blind sheep. Just get in line and do the best you can for your family. Tower 7, 7 hours later ?
Tony O
2009-02-08 13:15:54 UTC
Hilary Clinton did it
No more Y/A for me!
2009-02-08 13:12:22 UTC
Ya, I beleive it was because I had my brains sucked out. Do I get my 10 points now?
hog b
2009-02-08 13:11:43 UTC
Yes and no.



Yes:

It was an inside job, to believe otherwise you have to imagine that 19 people could fly around the US, at will for hours, hitting, among other things, the most secure building in the country, without being intercepted.



You also have to be pre Newtonian in your understanding of physics, regarding the collapses of the Twin Towers and WTC7.



No:

I don't think Bush is any more than a puppet.



As for why I believe that, I will let the former director of the Star Wars strategy, a USAF colonel, a Phd, and with many other qualifications speak for me, not that I didn't work it out for myself, his words may carry more weight.



(Of course we are encouraged to believe that people who don't believe the official /11 narrative also believe there was no moon landing, and that big foot exists, but most of us are not quite that gullible).



so this is what Colonel Robert Bowman Phd has to say:



In his words:

"I will sponsor (and have already lined up co-sponsors for) legislation initiating a truly independent investigation of 9/11. There is mounting evidence of complicity by elements of our own government.



If they have nothing to hide, why are they hiding everything?



Why are they hiding audiotapes of FAA and NORAD controllers? Why are they hiding videotapes of whatever hit the Pentagon? Why are they hiding the black boxes? Why did they destroy most of the forensic evidence showing that three buildings at the World Trade Center were brought down by thermite demolition charges?



If the thermite residue found on severed steel beams didn’t bring down the towers, what did? (Never before in history did steel skyscrapers fall because of fire, and THREE of them did on the same day … one of which wasn’t even hit by an airplane!)



Why did four hijacked airliners fly around for up to an hour and 45 minutes without being intercepted? Why were normal procedures not followed? (If normal procedures HAD been followed, the aircraft would have been intercepted with 20 minutes to spare, the twin towers would still be standing, and thousands of dead Americans would still be alive.)



If it was massive incompetence, why has no one been fired? … or demoted? … or court martialed? (Instead they were promoted or given the medal of freedom!)



If Osama bin Laden was really suspected, why did our government violate its own “no-fly” order to hurriedly fly the bin Laden family out of the United States before they could be questioned? Why does the “Osama bin Laden” in the “confession” videotape have a nose about an inch shorter than the real Osama bin Laden?



Why have half a dozen of the 19 “hijackers” turned up in other countries … alive and well? Were there really any hijackers at all, and if there were, were they patsies?



Who made millions on short sales of United and American Airlines? Where is the tens of billions of dollars worth of missing gold that was stored in the World Trade Center?



The American people and the families of those who died on 9/11 deserve the truth, and we do not yet have it. The above are but a tiny fraction of the unanswered questions not even raised by those who “investigated” the 9/11 tragedy.



The most unbelievable of all the conspiracy theories surrounding 9/11 is the OFFICIAL conspiracy theory told us by our government. The Kean-Hamilton commission report was a whitewash, a cover-up, and a bundle of deception.



If a new investigation identifies those responsible, they should be indicted for treason. And those who covered up the treason should themselves be indicted as accessories after the fact."



I think that gives the lie to the idea that those who want to get to the truth are all "crazy conspiracy theorists".



By the way texas am is so secure in his beliefs he blocks anybody who disagrees with him, that says it all really.
anonymous
2009-02-08 13:11:44 UTC
No it was an outside job done by two aircraft.
Tequila....
2009-02-08 15:20:15 UTC
i don't believe it ....but answered anyway
Wethepeople
2009-02-08 13:12:20 UTC
Liberals will tell you it was,but then again they will tell you the sky will fall if you don't do what they say.
anonymous
2009-02-08 13:14:32 UTC
An outside job (Israel) with inside cooperation.
anonymous
2009-02-08 13:14:28 UTC
what not again ...try another question if you can think of a good one
anonymous
2009-02-08 13:12:40 UTC
I do, me and my cousin spent like a day ages ago researching it.



And from what we gathered I do think it was an inside job.
bmovies60
2009-02-08 13:11:42 UTC
"do you think 9/11 was an inside job?"



No, I'm not a nutjob.



Now give me my 10 points.
BabyDoll
2009-02-08 13:13:19 UTC
Yes i do, always have. Dont know what his father began though so cant answer ur 2nd question.
anonymous
2009-02-08 13:11:42 UTC
I don't know. I just don't know. There's convincing arguments on both sides of the debate.
anonymous
2009-02-08 13:16:14 UTC
no


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...