Question:
Why do left wingers keep forgetting it was Clinton who first told us about Saddam's WMD and attacked in 1998?
Liberals Love Censorship
2014-03-10 18:20:28 UTC
No WMD were ever found in Iraq during Clinton's entire presidency.

Yet here he is, talking as if he's positive Saddam has WMD, and he's so sure of it he's launching a military attack over it:

“Earlier today, I ordered America's armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces. Their mission is to attack Iraq's nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors…

“Other countries possess weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missiles. With Saddam, there is one big difference: He has used them. Not once, but repeatedly. Unleashing chemical weapons against Iranian troops during a decade-long war. Not only against soldiers, but against civilians, firing Scud missiles at the citizens of Israel, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and Iran. And not only against a foreign enemy, but even against his own people, gassing Kurdish civilians in Northern Iraq.

”The international community had little doubt then, and I have no doubt today, that left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will use these terrible weapons again. "

Speech from the Oval Office by President William Clinton, explaining his attack on Iraq
reported by The Associated Press
Wednesday, December 16, 1998

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/stories/clintontext121698.htm

Bill Clinton was impeached on December 19, 1998.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ENAV_UoIfgc
President Clinton orders attack on Iraq in 1998

Do a google video search on "democrat wmd" to see how many Democrats insisted that Saddam had WMD, all the way back to Al Gore in 1992.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AEIOtn1wk5g&NR=1
WMD AND THE "LIARS" WHO SAID SADDAM HAD THEM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0h6gehCPvpk
Gore To Bush: You Ignored Saddam's Terrorist Ties!
Al Gore lashes out face-to-face at President Bush, Sr. in 1992, accusing him of failing to act on Saddam's nuclear weapons and WMD programs.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ysmwASJKCDc&feature=related
BUSH LIED!- with groovy photo of Slick and Hillary as Eurotrash


There is NO PROOF that there were ever WMD in Iraq during Clinton's presidency.
Ten answers:
tribeca_belle
2014-03-10 18:27:52 UTC
Clinton did not invade Iraq. Bush did.



The issue was whether there were WMDs in Iraq at the time that Bush wanted to invade.



The UN inspectors in Iraq were not finding any. They begged for more time to complete their inspections. They were forced to leave because Bush was invading.



What about that do you not understand? Why are cons constantly trying to blame Clinton for Bush’s invasion?



Edit: Every time you cons bring up this Clinton excuse it just reminds everyone how determined Bush was to invade and what a horrible act he committed that cost thousands of lives unnecessarily. We are also still paying for that very expensive war.



You might also review the PNAC attempts to get Clinton to invade Iraq. He refused. Oil was a major factor in the PNAC thinking. Saddam had shut out the American oil companies from consideration for future contracts. The PNAC neocons in the Bush administration finally got their way.



Bush is responsible for what Bush did – not Clinton, not Obama, not Democrats in Congress, not any other entity on whom you would try to foist the blame for Bush's actions.
honestamerican
2014-03-11 01:24:27 UTC
Which does not excuse that Bush lied about using all diplomatic avenues before using force in Iraq!



Bush ordered the UN weapons inspectors out of Iraq so he could start bombing! Even though Saddam was complying with the UN resolutions at the time!



Enough said!
mommanuke
2014-03-11 01:31:14 UTC
Actually, I believe that it was the first Bush who brought his name up, but he had to be careful because he knew, having been head of the CIA, that we had sent him the WMD's to fight Iran when he started a war with them. But what Clinton said in the 90's was just as irrelevant as the fact that Republicans were not the ones who started the KKK 150 years ago. We knew better before we invaded.
toddrick
2014-03-11 01:23:34 UTC
Sweet story. Never saw it before. How does it end.



Remember when clinton launched cruise missiles at a factory in Afghanistan in an attempt to kill a little known figure named Osama and he was crucified by republicans.
?
2014-03-11 01:30:39 UTC
Bill Clinton was burdened with a full republican Congress for his two terms as president.
?
2014-03-11 01:45:41 UTC
The sad thing here is that NONE, and I mean, NONE of these Liberals that have answered have ever heard of Operation Infinite Reach. They don't know that Clinton bombed another sovereign country because he thought they were making WMD's. No WMD's were ever found. LIBERALS DON'T CARE.
?
2014-03-11 01:30:09 UTC
"Clinton did not invade Iraq. Bush did."



Liberal Logic: It's OK to talk about how evil someone is as long as you don't have the balls to do something about it.
2014-03-11 01:25:30 UTC
They don't care about the truth, and they don't even care if you know their lying, Obama ran his campaign on Lies, so That's the message sent to Libs
2014-03-11 01:22:36 UTC
Wow, that's a lot of slick Willy. He was right .
?
2014-03-11 02:03:01 UTC
Bush made him say it though....lol


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...