Question:
Why are libs for Government run insurance instead of less expensive private insurance for All?
2009-08-08 04:05:38 UTC
FACT: The only "crisis" in this country around healthcare is the COST of it. Not quality, not availability.

Sen Demint (SC) has a plan called Health Care Freedom Act that would force interstate competition and give families who don't get employer insurance $5,000 a year to buy health insurance.

Sen Charles Wrangle (D) has refused to allow that proposal )and no less than 6 others) that would reduce heatlh Insurance costs to even have a vote in his committee.

There are many ways we could reduce the costs of insurance and make it affordable for ALL.

Why are the Libs ignoring that and going straight for Government Controlled Health Insurance ( really Healthcare ) ?
Seven answers:
2009-08-08 04:11:31 UTC
YOUR QUESTION IS PREPOSTEROUS

LESS EXPENSIVE PRIVATE INSURANCE?

WHERE THE HELL HAS THAT EVER HAPPENED IN THIS COUNTRY?

THE INSURANCE COMPANIES TAKE 40% OF EVERY HEALTH CARE DOLLAR.

THAT IS WHY WE NEED NON-PROFIT COMPETITION!

THAT IS HOW YOU GET CHEAPER PRIVATE INSURANCE!
2016-09-12 01:21:52 UTC
I suggest you to try this site where you can compare quotes from the best companies: http://insuranceforcheap.info/index.html?src=2YAfiyi92Eb



RE :Why are libs for Government run insurance instead of less expensive private insurance for All?

FACT: The only "crisis" in this country around healthcare is the COST of it. Not quality, not availability.



Sen Demint (SC) has a plan called Health Care Freedom Act that would force interstate competition and give families who don't get employer insurance $5,000 a year to buy health insurance.



Sen Charles Wrangle (D) has refused to allow that proposal )and no less than 6 others) that would reduce heatlh Insurance costs to even have a vote in his committee.



There are many ways we could reduce the costs of insurance and make it affordable for ALL.



Why are the Libs ignoring that and going straight for Government Controlled Health Insurance ( really Healthcare ) ?

Update: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/08/...

Update 2: LOL SELDON >>>CHILL OUT.



The reason why it's NEVER happened is because the DEMS block torte reform and the repeal of interstate laws.



FACTCHECK.ORG

http://www.factcheck.org/politics/pushin...



Ins Company profits represent a whopping...



0.60 & of healthcare spending in this country.



That is 60 cents for every 100 dollars..



FACT--- Get a F'ing clue what you're talking about

Update 3: That is 0.60 % ok.. Not 40 % LOL

Update 4: Same article that I linked.



CEO Salaries represent 0.005 % of total spending.



next....

Follow 5 answers
Marble Cake
2009-08-08 04:19:55 UTC
Because it only makes sense. Insurance companies bring in more money than they spend. They also have to pay ridiculous CEO and Director's salaries. These people make way more than our own President. Even with perceived government inefficiencies it would still be much cheaper. Did you know in typical government officies they have to bring there own coffee to work? I have never worked at a company that didn't have free all you can drink coffee all day. The last company I worked at said coffee cost $100,000 per year. And we had our own race car in Indy complete with driver and team. Also government jobs pay less than their private counterparts. People like to talk about government inefficiencies but the companies I have worked at just literally throw money away. It is simply not possible that government run healthcare could cost more than private insurance.
2009-08-08 04:11:46 UTC
Why are libs for Government run insurance instead of less expensive private insurance for All?



"Government run" is the keyword here.
?
2017-03-21 14:44:15 UTC
I recommend you to visit this web page where you can get rates from different companies: http://HELP-INSURE.NET/index.html?src=5YAxnu68umH27deW1



RE :Why are libs for Government run insurance instead of less expensive private insurance for All?

FACT: The only "crisis" in this country around healthcare is the COST of it. Not quality, not availability.



Sen Demint (SC) has a plan called Health Care Freedom Act that would force interstate competition and give families who don't get employer insurance $5,000 a year to buy health insurance.



Sen Charles Wrangle (D) has refused to allow that proposal )and no less than 6 others) that would reduce heatlh Insurance costs to even have a vote in his committee.



There are many ways we could reduce the costs of insurance and make it affordable for ALL.



Why are the Libs ignoring that and going straight for Government Controlled Health Insurance ( really Healthcare ) ?

Update: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/08/...

Update 2: LOL SELDON >>>CHILL OUT.



The reason why it's NEVER happened is because the DEMS block torte reform and the repeal of interstate laws.



FACTCHECK.ORG

http://www.factcheck.org/politics/pushin...



Ins Company profits represent a whopping...



0.60 & of healthcare spending in this country.



That is 60 cents for every 100 dollars..



FACT--- Get a F'ing clue what you're talking about

Update 3: That is 0.60 % ok.. Not 40 % LOL

Update 4: Same article that I linked.



CEO Salaries represent 0.005 % of total spending.



next....

Follow 7 answers
2009-08-11 00:50:02 UTC
they weren't about to offer anything until the competetive shock from the govt. that was intended from the begining to lower everyones prices.
2009-08-08 04:14:52 UTC
They think the government is their "Daddy".


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...