Sorry, but that is a lie and you should already know that is a lie. I am not for Trump. In fact, I hope he gets impeached. Still, the impeachment process including inquiries takes time. Thus far there is not even evidence of Trump doing anything illegal. Don jr.'s actions MIGHT have been illegal depending on how one reads the law.
That's right, this is up to interpretation. The question is if Don was asking for something of monetary value from the Russian and whether or not the Russian lawyer truly represented Russia. It would actually be pretty difficult to show both beyond a reasonable doubt. If we were talking about a preponderance of the evidence in a civil trial, that would be another matter.
Furhter, you have impeachment being done by Congress. If the democrats were in charge of Congress, this woudl happen quicker. Then again, if Hillary were president under a repub Congress with all the crap she has done, she would likely be impeached.
If anything, Trump being loud and brash has caused him to be more likely to be impeached because of all of the negative media attention. Further, the media is known to be biased against while straight males.
So my suggestion is that you should stop lying. You are doing yourself no favors. The only people that believe the nonsense you spew are idiots that would believe that crap wrapped in tin foil is a Hershey's kiss. For the rest of us people who would actually consider impeachment, it just shows the impeachment side to be either liars or ignorant.
Edit:
AS far as Hillary not getting elected, she screwed herself. You don't call 40% of the US "deplorable" and not have that affect your election. And talking about people not voting for her, because they are sexist, WHEN YOU ARE IN THE LEAD, is just plain ignorant.
Her biggest mistake, however, was her avoidance of the media. Trump was headline news during most of the election process. Hillary hid from negative press instead of directly tackling the negative press. If she would have come out and directly dealt with the press, she would have easily mitigated the effect of the "slow trickle" of negative press. Her silence made it worse.
In fact, I would have taken every new press story as an opportunity. Go on news and spend 1 minute talking about the story and smoothly move over to your policy and how you are going to bring jobs to the US or improve health care or whatever. If she would have done that after every news story on her, she would have easily won. In fact, that would have made the whole series of stories about her an actual net positive. THAT is exactly what Bill Clinton and Obama would have done. That is why Obama and Bill won and Hillary lost.
The biggest problem Hillary had was that she is simply not charismatic. Bill and Obama are charismatic. They are able to motivate the Democrats to come out and vote. You have to remember that in a nation of >300 million people, the idea that your vote does not really matter is actually quite true. Your vote doesn't. Your vote is not going to decide crap. MANY votes will decide, but one makes no difference at all. You have to strongly motivate people to vote and Hillary simply did not get the numbers because she is not charismatic. Trump did not win because of more repubs coming out ot vote, but because of less democrats coming out to vote.
All of this is rather known, if you actually were looking at the reasons and doing research instead of just spouting some ignorant nonsense.