How Many Vets Could Have Got Retirement Benefits With The 1 Billion and "Change" That Obama Spent In Libya?

Question

Ron Paul would cut out useless federal agencies to save trillions and end all the wars we are in to save trillions more. Obama wants to reduce military retirement benefits to save 450 billion.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/07/world/panetta-weighs-military-cuts-once-thought-out-of-bounds.html

Answer 1

Ron Paul 2012

Answer 2

Conservatives are against sending better body armor to our troops. Conservatives wanted this war as well and now that we won, the ones that did not gave credit to everyone except Obama. And now you have the nerve to ask this question. Step back fool.

Answer 3

Ron Paul would kill this country. His ideas are truly a threat to both the security of the US and the world.

Answer 4

Vets don't get retirement benefits unless they serve 20 years or more.



If you separate from service before that you don't get retirement benefits.



You do get veterans benefits though.

Answer 5

Those are big promises for someone who after 20 plus years in Congress hasn't accomplished anything to speak of

Answer 6

Way to miss the point of the article entirely. Good job.

Answer 7

How about the billions wasted in corporate welfare?

Answer 8

How about the medical care, and mental health care they need so desperately.

Answer 9

Notice how the lefties are conveniently leaving that out but then claim the Police are willfully attacking Veterans at OWS protest? Obama, the left and OWS are just plain pathetic !!!!!!!!!!!!

Answer 10

Not nearly as many as could have gotten them with the trillions spent in Iraq.

Answer 11

Your messiah Qaddafy is dead and those vets need to get a job and get off my teat.



Deal with it.

Answer 12

Zero if the fund was invested in "green technology".