Question:
What do you think is the best solution in dealing with the North Korea situation?
Booger Head
2010-05-25 22:56:22 UTC
Sanctions? Nukes? Three brisk spankings and a butterscotch enema for "Dear Leader"?

What do you think would be the best way to handle the situation?
Fourteen answers:
zizi yO
2010-05-25 23:00:30 UTC
All have their options:



A nuke wouldn't be the best idea. China/South Korea may be unnerved by the blast radius, plus the fact that North Korea would probably try to fire off all their nukes before being vaporized.



Sanctions is the equivalent of a slap on the wrist and that's been tried numerous times.



Waiting out for Kim Jong-Il to die wouldn't work either because when he's done for and if his son doesn't have his influence, a military general may launch a coup d' etat which would lead to potential North Korean aggression.



There really is no real answer to this.



Best strategy though might be to utilize sanctions to the max though. North Korea absolutely needs the supplies/food to maintain their state of affairs. Though like I said earlier, that may not really work if it hasn't proven successful the last few times.
2010-05-26 06:04:16 UTC
It's a very difficult situation but I think it is being handled the right way. The US is going to carry the big stick and talk a small game in the meantime, but we are at this moment beginning to show naval presence and I think NK will get the message. The South, I feel bad for them. They lost lives in that attack and they will have to bite their lip again. The problem is that clear, factual information is not all there yet. It may very well be a case of a SK vessel spying in North sea territory. Either way, until we know hard facts it is just a grave situation all around. I hope it does not escalate any further.
2010-05-26 06:07:27 UTC
This is from a post in the New York times website, I thought it was interesting enough to share it:



This is the local election season in Korea, and President Lee's authoritarian government, like the previous regimes of his party, is resorting to red-mongering to garner the support from wary Koreans. They have good reasons to appeal to old dependable tactics like North Threat. This local election almost coincides with the first anniversary of the former President Moo-Hyun Roh's suicide, widely regarded here as orchestrated by President Lee and his minnows for their political gains. His death drew wide condemnation of the current goverment, and his funeral was attended by about 5 million people.



The most curious thing about the sinking of the frigate "Cheonan", which sank amidst the USA-South Korea joint war exercise including the 3 most technologically advanced Aegis cruise ships, nuclear submarines and serveral other warships, is that there are no tell-tale signs of the hard explosion in the ship, although the sinking was allegedly caused by a torpedo! None of sailors dead or alive suffered from the concussions, no dead fish found floating in nearby water, no observation of flashes, or water columns typical of the underwater detonation. Even the structural damages suffered by the ship shows no sign of the detonation of high explosives near or within the ship.



Remember this is the most heavily guarded military zone in the world, barring almost none. At the time when the ship sank, nearby land-based military posts were training their infra-red cameras on it. The Korean military claimed that the crucial few minuites' worth of video on the very event of the frigate torn apart was not recorded, although videos are available before and after. How improbable is it that all the cameras from multipe observation posts whose job is to record all events 24 hours 365 days missed the event? There are even allegations that some high ranking military brasses watched the full video of the event, and that they saw the ship just plitted into two halves. As usual, the Korean military is denying the story.



In order to explain the lack of the apparent hard explosion, the government-appoined military commission in charge of the investigation came up with a ultra-sophisticated "bubble-jet" torpedo scenario . This is the torpedo technology only USA is supposed to have made it to work so far, because it has to be highly intelligent enough to posit the torpedo precisely in the middle of a moving ship, just a few meters below the hull right before the detonation for the optimal effect. Actual requirements for the technology has to be more than sophisticated, because the water around where the ship sank is not only very shallow, only a few meters deep at most, and the tide is fast, at a few knots. And the waves were high at 3 meters on the night of the sinking. Perhaps even treacherous is fishing nets mounted around the water. How smart is the torpedo that can navigate around all these obstacles, and hit the anti-submarine frigate, well south of the border, while leaving no sign of sonar signature! Subsequently the speed boat or submarine escaped undetected. Here we only have to assume that the North Korean navy owns ultra-silent, stealth submarine/submergibles that can evade any conceivable military technology...



The comic thing about the alleged remains of the torpedo the commission herladed as the exhibition A for the public recently is that the torpedo is not the super-sophisticated one they've been arguing for, but the antique variety developed by NK in 1980's.



The Korean military has been refusing to reveal any information related to the sinking, except the pieces of information fitting their own foregone conclusions. Facts as simple as the trajectory of the ship at the fateful night have not been disclosed. Such information would tell a lot about the causes of the sinking. Not that they have not disclosed such information ever before. In the previous administrations, they were a lot more forthcoming. Under the current administration? NopThey behave as if they have the full confidence of the power that be, and they don't need the support from the Korean people.



The ship showed the plenty signs of agrounding. It had numerous scratch marks alongside the hull. The bottom was even slitted with gaping holes, with the stress marks everywhere. All blades of a screw were bent toward the bow and the other torn apart. A sure sign of the ship trying to back off from agrounding.



Lost are in the midst of the Cheonan sinking not only the lives of 46 conscripted and enlisted soldiers (none of officers dead), but also the prospect of the peace between two Koreas, and the transparency of democracy. With the election campaign in full swing, the goverment party is calling anyone who questions the goverment version of the event "the reds", and began indicting them.



We may hear the true story, perhaps in the next government
Not having an Obasm
2010-05-26 06:07:18 UTC
A briefcase nuke in Hanoi.



Just kidding. Sort of.



I'm afraid there is nothing short of state sponsored violence (in whatever form - from assassination up to and including all out war) that will stop that man. He may not be as insane as that crackpot in Iran, but he is far more of an ideologue and will not respond to either or UN sponsored sanctions. As proof, look at what effect any of those tactics have had on him so far, and he's too old to change now.
mousepad
2010-05-26 06:02:11 UTC
We need to get China out of its neutral position and pressure N.K. The problem is, China identifies itself as Communist and does not want to betray N.K. by getting on the "wrong side" of the partnership. China still trades with N.K. and wants to continue that relationship. Given its global status, they also want to be looked up as the "big brother" whenever the Asian countries are in need.



The other interesting attitude by China is that they don't want to tell another country what to do with their weapons program, because that would seem hypocritical. They've been feared by Western powers for a time for developing military weaponry scaled for war, so they're not exactly encouraged to do the same for N.K.
2010-05-26 06:50:21 UTC
Nothing will happen. There will be a lot of posturing. There will be a war of words to save face.

The reason I say this is because America won't want to upset China because they owe about 900 billion dollars to China. All three of them are intertwined because of trade and won't want to cause damage to their own economies by falling out with each other because they all have too much to loose. China won't want a war because of border controls with North Korea and won't want millions and millions of starving communists fleeing into their country.

http://www.ustreas.gov/tic/mfh.txt
L.T.M.
2010-05-26 06:00:07 UTC
The Powell Doctrine: Once at war Powell has asserted that every resource and tool should be used to achieve decisive force against the enemy, minimizing US casualties and ending the conflict quickly by forcing the weaker force to capitulate. This is well in line with Western military strategy dating at least from Carl von Clausewitz's On War.
Smooch The Pooch
2010-05-26 06:04:38 UTC
Some huge no-holds barred guaranteed threats. N Ko is provoking to get us moving....
Destructive Politics The Book
2010-05-26 06:07:49 UTC
let them fight it out or it will be another 50 years of cold war between those 2 countries.
lonewolfe38652
2010-05-26 06:06:50 UTC
Glow in the dark!!
2010-05-26 06:01:42 UTC
Nuke all the gooks for good!

They should do it now before they kill us all.
Big Daddy
2010-05-26 06:00:35 UTC
It is S. korea's problem.



And they have not been open about where the boat was and what it was doing when it sank.
zzone
2010-05-26 06:04:23 UTC
Send Nancy Pelosi over there, naked. they would puke themselves to death.
2010-05-26 05:59:38 UTC
you cant get involved in everything that happens its not our call


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...