- Since the creation of Pakistan, its end game is to cause as much destruction within Bharat by activating direct insurgency in Kashmir, extending support to terrorists in the Northeast and supplying arms and explosives to sow seeds of internal dissent. Their mindset being what is, driven by a fundamentalist religious ideology, which is basically undemocratic and totally devoid of any concern for the common man's need in the country.
The Pakistani government has systematically and brazenly sponsored murder and terrorism in Bharat for more than a decade without any retaliation. Various Pakistan's Prime Minister has clearly said from time to time that such aggressions will happen again and again. This is a classical case of diminishing responsibility.
From Bharat's point of view, it would be justifiable if Bharat persists for total victory in Kashmir, which in its aftermath would induce political developments that would not allow Pakistan to exist in the form that it exists now.
Pakistan has been sponsoring terrorism in Bharat for the past 57 years. Casualties in these terrorist activities have been in several thousands. Bharat still talks about peace and tolerance and friendship with Pakistan. Patience of Hindus of Bharat with Pakistan seems to be infinite. This has given them the incentive to continue with more terrorism, bombings etc. So far, Bharat has never tried to prosecute Pakistan for its terrorism. Pakistan will never end its policy of terrorism and destabilisation as long as we have a policy of timidity and tolerance. Pakistan ridicules us because we reward their hostility with friendship and even with money, bus trips and cricket matches. So far Pakistan has never paid a price for its mischief against Bharat. Hence, sponsorship of terrorism will continue. What has been missing in Bharat's dealings with Pakistan, it is accountability and punishment. Pakistan is a criminal country and needs to be punished severely.
Pakistan spends more than 60 percent of its annual budget on its corrupt bureaucrats and on military and debt services. Such expenses can never invigorate its economy. Depending on the United States and Islamic countries for economic assistance and handouts is not a clear solution for any country, may be even Pakistan, which is forever mired in terrorist activities and minority suppression of non-Muslim Hindus and in Sind and Baluchistan.
Pakistan realises that as long as Bharat remains economically strong, Bharat could not be militarily defeated and destroyed. It has therefore embarked on building terrorist cells all over Bharat and escalating proxy war. Bharat has already spent about 95,000 crore rupees fighting the proxy war, not including the cost of war in Kargil. Now Bharat has to fight on several fronts -- on the Line of Control against the Pakistan-backed intruders, on the diplomatic front and also internally to foil secessionist designs of the Inter Services intelligence, beside the economic front where if steps not taken effectively might prove disastrous.
A brief review of demographic facts will convince anyone that Hindus are indeed facing a survival threat. It is worth reminding that at the time of partition in 1947, the Muslims constituted about 25 percent of the population of united Bharat.
In 1947, at the time of independence from the British, Pakistan had between 30 to 40 percent Hindus; today the Pakistan population has less than one percent Hindus. Hindu population in the Islamic Bangladesh has reduced from 38 percent in 1947 to about eight percent now. But the Muslim population in "secular Bharat" has swelled from eight percent to eighteen percent. This is mainly due to high growth rates amongst Muslims and migration from the neighbouring Islamic Bangladesh and high birth rate in Muslim families. While in the "secular Bharat", every one, including Muslims has enjoyed equal rights, in Islamic Pakistan, Hindus, Sikhs and Christians do not have voting or any other rights.
Both in the Islamic Pakistan and the Islamic Bangladesh, Hindus are placed under discriminatory and threatening conditions. This led to ethnic cleansing of Hindus and Sikhs from the land they lived and thrived for thousands of years. In Bharatiya Kashmir, Hindus have been cleansed out by Pakistan supported Islamic terrorists as Pakistan wants Kashmir part of its country. It is not just Kashmir; Pakistan is after, the whole Bharat along with the destruction of Bharat and extermination of non-Muslims and Hindus in particular.
Muslims must not be allowed to execute demographic genocide of Hindus through population growth. Bharat should internationalise the issue of ethnic cleansing of Hindus from Pakistan, Bangladesh and Kashmir and call for accountability for these deeds. This is a very legitimate issue. In addition, the high growth rates of Muslims and the associated long-term consequences affecting non-Muslims survival should be spelled out. Raising these issues at the international level should generate sympathy, understanding and possibly support for corrective actions taken to remove this threat from Pakistan.
The right of a population to survive is the most fundamental human right of all rights. Bharatiya Muslims now have two Islamic countries, Pakistan and Bangle Desh exclusively for themselves. Hindus have been driven out of these two exclusive countries and have only Bharat for themselves.
Unless Bharat takes a rigid stand against Pakistan or abolishes the nuisance of the existence of Pakistan, there will be no end of this mischief. Pakistan is an Islamic terrorist state like other Islamic states. Why Bharat have to be friendly with Pakistan all the time or why Pakistani cricket team is allowed to play in Bharat where Muslims of Bharat raise the slogan "Pakistan Zindabad". Unconfirmed reports said that when cricket match between Bharat and Pakistan, then at that time none of the 1000 or odd "Pakistani cricket fans" who came to Bharat to "witness the match" never returned. Were they spies?
Inability of the Bharatiya political leadership in the past to grasp the essential elements of the entire picture is evident from the fact that Pakistan continues activities detrimental to Bharatiya nation state even today.
By smuggling of mercenaries and arms via the coastal areas of Gujarat, hostile terrain?s of Gujarat, Kashmir, porous borders of Rajasthan, and by extending narco-terrorism into Punjab, Pakistan keep continue to tie down Bharatiya military and police and the administration. To a determined enemy, endless possibilities abound since it has gauged that as Bharatiyas, we do not have the will to pose a direct challenge to Pakistan's integrity. The enemy Pakistan holds to ransom Bharat because the pre-eminent power in the subcontinent refuses to project any counter threat.
The faulty Bharatiya doctrine envisages defending the territorial integrity of Bharat by deploying the military resources merely to push back the Pakistan invasion to borders. The enemy Pakistan is allowed to live to strike on another day. Prithvi Raj Chauhan defeated Mohammed Gauri seventeen times and every time Prithivi Raj let the invader go, with the ultimate result Mohammed Gauri won on his eighteen attempt. When Prithvi Raj lost the battle, he lost his empire and was killed and Hindus became slave of Muslims for thousand of years. The doctrine of letting the enemy go unhurt and unpunished is an extension of the centuries old fortress mentality which resulted in invasions from our western borders.
Our history argues against letting the enemy go unpunished because the defensive defence mode erroneously allows the enemy to retain the element of surprise. With large borders located in hostile terrain, this politico-military doctrine expects the impossible to guard physically every square inch of the territory. Another negative dimension is the internal consumption of enormous military power due to external interference.
Weapons and forces by themselves do not constitute a source of security or a threat but the ideas and attitude governing their use and usability do. Therefore in order to safeguard national interests, the political leadership must shift to the strategic doctrine of offensive defence. This will ensure defence of national interests along with territorial integrity. It is an assertive, not aggressive philosophy which, if used wisely, can deal effectively with forces inimical to Bharat.
In the offensive defensive mode, a correct appreciation of the situation and counter action to neutralise the developing threat are mandatory. What is military meant for? Military is meant for destroying enemies and for creating peace and prosperity in the country. It is time that Bharatiya military be used to destroy Pakistan and other enemies of Bharat.
The bitter truth about the partition of Bharat out of fundamentalist hatred, the agonies of the Bharat bound migrants of that time and misadventure in Kashmir in 1947 - 48, reveal the first signs of Pakistani design to disturb the tranquillity of Bharat. Various actual and proxy wars with Pakistan and terrorist activities has compelled Bharat to shell out billions of dollars to defend us. Under the offensive-defensive doctrine, the bottom line assessment is that a stable Pakistan is not in our national interest. A counter strategy to degrade Pakistan's capability to pose a threat in future needs to be worked upon. Bharat should also deal with Pakistan with cold-blooded ruthlessness.
Without a national identity, Pakistan is an incomplete and, therefore, an insecure state. Our counter strategy must be a pragmatic study of the prevalent conditions in Pakistan. Seeds of instability were sown by the Punjabi Muslims who dominate all structures of power. Claims laid to equality in power sharing by the Sindhis, Pathans and Baluchis were ignore...