Was 9/11 a conspiracy?

Question

Firstly rip to all that sadly lost their lives. Secondly someone told me today that there was more to it, just want to know your thoughts on it

Answer 1

it was a Mossad job.



http://www.rys2sense.com/hub/get/post/



http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/fiveisraelis.html



http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/israel_9-11_index.html



http://killtown.blogspot.com/2005/11/dancing-israelis-on-911.html



http://physics911.net/

Answer 2

Binary options let users trade in currency pairs and stocks for various predetermined time-periods, minimal of which is 30 seconds. Executing trades is straightforward. The system uses user-friendly interfaces, which even an 8 years old kid, can operate without having to read any instructions. But winning trades is Not easy.

Binary trading is advertised as the only genuine system that lets users earn preposterous amounts of money in ridiculously short period of time. Advertisers try to implicate as if you can make $350 every 60 seconds; if it was true then binary trading would truly be an astonishing business.

However, does it make any sense? Can every trader make tons of money in binary trading? Who is actually paying all the money or the profit to traders?

The first challenge is finding a trustworthy binary broker; secondly, you need to find a binary trading strategy, which you can use to make profits consistently. Without an effective trading strategy, there is no way you can make money in this business.

Learning a profitable trading strategy is possible, You should watch this presentation video https://tr.im/d0306

It's probably the best way to learn how to win with binary option

Answer 3

/11 conspiracy theories are conspiracy theories that reject the mainstream interpretation of the September 11 attacks. These theories assert that the official report on the events is not sufficiently forthright, thorough or truthful. Many critics allege that individuals in the government of the United States knew of the impending attacks and intentionally failed to act on that knowledge. Some critics state that the attacks could have been a false flag operation carried out by a private network of high-level officials in the U.S. Government. The common suspected motives were the use of the attacks as a pretext to justify overseas wars, to facilitate increased military spending, and to restrict domestic civil liberties.

Many of these theories have been voiced by members of the 9/11 Truth movement, a name adopted by organizations and individuals who question the mainstream account of the attacks.[1] Generally, individuals and groups belonging to the 9/11 Truth Movement reject the accuracy of the mainstream account of the attacks, demand a new investigation into the attacks, and often investigate aspects of the September 11 attacks themselves. A prominent claim is that the collapse of the World Trade Center was the result of a controlled demolition.[2][3] Some also contend that a commercial airliner did not crash into the Pentagon; this position is debated within the 9/11 Truth movement, many of whom believe that AA Flight 77 did crash there, but that it was allowed to do so via an effective stand down of the military.[4]

Published reports by the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology rejected the controlled demolition conspiracy theories.[5][6] The community of civil engineers generally accepts the mainstream account that the impacts of jet aircraft at high speeds in combination with subsequent fires, rather than controlled demolition, led to the collapse of the Twin Towers.[7]

Answer 4

It was a conspiracy of course ... the question is "who are all the conspirators".



One thing is for sure - the official explanations are so full of lies and impossible coincidences that it casts the whole of the official story into doubt.



Before answering the question in your own mind, you might first want to learn about the media deception and how and why that deception worked. There is an excellent academic paper about that available from this media watchdog group from Sonoma State University.



Deconstructing Deceit: 9/11, The Media, and Myth Information

http://www.projectcensored.org/articles/story/deconstructing-deceit/



There is a link on that page to their paper, which is in PDF format. The summary from the main page reads as follows:





"This investigative report concerns itself with the ongoing phenomena of media myth making and the events of September 11th, 2001. Corporate mainstream media have resurrected powerful myths from America’s past to shape public perception in the present. Through the prism of 9/11 as case study, one can see how the corporate mass media are in fact doing more myth making than news reporting, which amounts to a form of censorship. Here, Professors Huff and Rea examine central historic American myths the corporate media and even much of the alternative independent media have extended into the post-9/11 era especially about the events of 9/11 themselves. This analysis looks at how media mythmaking surrounding the events of 9/11, exploiting the strong emotions these events aroused, has prevented a dispassionate inquiry of its causes or of those responsible."





Next, have a look at these web sites of many highly qualified and reputable who share one thing in common. That is they are willing to stand up and be counted as publicly questioning the official account of 9/11.



Don't for a minute think this is the movement in totality. Most people are not willing to PUBLICLY question 9/11 for fear of stigmatization and/or damage to their careers.



Senior Military, Intelligence, and Government Officials

http://www.wanttoknow.info/officialsquestion911commissionreport



Professors

http://www.wanttoknow.info/070618professorsquestion911



Pilots

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/



Veterans

http://v911t.org/



Scholars

http://stj911.org/index.html



Architects and Engineers

http://www.ae911truth.org/



Firefighters

http://firefightersfor911truth.org/



Medical professionals

http://mp911truth.org/



911 Survivors and family members (those that did not place themselves under gag order by accepting the settlement.

http://patriotsquestion911.com/



(Page also includes links to other groups) not mentioned above



*****



If you conclude that the official explanation is BS, do not feel compelled to subscribe to an alternate theory. It is not the responsibility of the people to present an alternate theory. It is the responsibility of the government to provide provable and believable explanations for the events of that day.



By the way .... be careful to avoid calling it a "government" conspiracy. If the government was involved in any way, the involvement would better be described as "criminals in positions of power in government ". There is a huge, huge difference.

Answer 5

You can make too much money with Binary Options and you have to ways for that: learning to do very well or as you can see clicking the link below: ( http://forexsignal.kyma.info ) The most important thing is that if you have the right programs and you study the right stuff you WILL success in this buisness! This course explain everything you need to start a very profitable trading activity.

Answer 6

A lot of interested traders are asking themselves the question if you can really make money with binary options? The answer is that you can indeed make money in binary options trading. Learn here https://tr.im/MuSaf



Obviously this is a perfectly legitimate question considering that most people have not traded binary options in the past and generally believe that investing is a very difficult activity.



However, you will have to put an effort into it. You will have to learn money management, reading of charts as well as the usage of indicators.

Answer 7

Multiple people involved = conspiracy.

I wish people here would figure out what the hell conspiracy actually meant.



Of course it was a conspiracy.

The question is, who did it?

The govts explanation isn't satisfactory.

I'd be satisfied if they produced at least ONE clear image of a 757 anywhere near the Pentagon.

Just one clear image.

Why are there tons of images of the Hudson miracle, but none of a 757 anywhere near the Pentagon. All we get is a crayon smear of an image that could be a hacked up loogey for all we know.

How many security cameras are within a 5 mile radius of the Pentagon?

A hell of a lot more than were around the Hudson miracle.

I believe that it's rational to expect that one clear image of a 757 should be made available to the public to set our minds at ease.

Just one.

Uno.

One.

Answer 8

the best trading software http://tradingsolution.info

i have attended a lot of seminars, read counless books on forex trading and it all cost me thousands of dollars. the worst thing was i blew up my first account. after that i opened another account and the same thing happened again. i started to wonder why i couldn,t make any money in forex trading. at first i thought i knew everything about trading. finally i found that the main problem i have was i did not have the right mental in trading. as we know that psychology has great impact on our trading result. apart from psychology issue, there is another problem that we have to address. they are money management, market analysis, and entry/exit rules. to me money management is important in trading. i opened another account and start to trade profitably after i learnt from my past mistake. i don't trade emotionally anymore.

if you are serious about trading you need to address your weakness and try to fix it. no forex guru can make you Professional trader unless you want to learn from your mistake.

Answer 9

Try this site, it has a guided tour

http://www.911weknow.com/



there is much more evidence linked from there.



Also this documentary is pretty good;

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8172271955308136871



The one that is most science based is this one:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4617650616903609314



There aren't any serious people left who defend the findings of the 9/11 commission, even the lead counsel to the commission John Farmer, says it was set up to fail:

http://montreal911truth.org/home/tag/john-farmer/



if you look into it with an open mind what you will find is quite shocking

EDIT

For those who believe only crazy people doubt the official story. take a look at this list, they are far from crazy

http://patriotsquestion911.com/

Answer 10

I agree with the answerer that stated "kill the infidel" being in the Koran. It does not make those people look any better nor is their posturing that they are a community of peace believable.



Terrorism has been present a long time before 9/11 so there is more likelihood that 9/11 was an al-qaeda job. Even al-qaeda claims it to be their achievement against America.



I still do not know why they hate us. We buy their oil for prime price. We use it at a high rate and the Arab world has significantly benefited by our currency being poured into their economy. Just because the people who collect the cash do not divvy it up with the general population does not mean that we are at the root cause of some of their people being poor.



They do not have the guts to stand up against their own heads of state that are becoming rich off the land that belongs to the people there.



Hope their God will shed light to them. Also they do not believe that their God is not our God.



And no 9/11 is not an inside job.



Also this question about the pentagon plane crash is simple. A plan with a full tank of gas will evaporate leaving nothing absolutely no trace. Duralumin (the metal that aircraft is made of) is flammable above a certain temperature, It will flash and burn like Magnesium.

Answer 11

there are always two sides to a story some people will say no and be mad at you for asking the question in the first place with no knowledge of it other than what they hear on fox news and others will say yes with loose facts that they got from one youtube video or movie that they seen. research it yourself and come to your own conclusions. You have more than likely been exposed already to what conventional news such as cnn and fox news along with what our government says. so to start to see the other side go on google video and search zeitgeist.(it starts our kinda slow but then it gets into 911) I STRONGLY recommend that every american at least look into it and get the "facts" from both sides....if there really is a conspiracy then cnn and fox news would be compromised sources of information...just something to think about....

Answer 12

A group of blood thirsty, hate filled, bigoted, genocidal, Muslim extremists conspired to murder as many innocent civilians as possible



Do you understand how gleefully Obama released confidential documents about the water boarding of 3 sub-human murderous Muslim extremist pigs done a few times to each over 6 years ago? How much more gleefully would he have released documents that could have implicated Bush, Cheney, or other members of the Bush Administration in a plot like 9/11. It would have enabled democrats to win every election for the next 100 years.

Answer 13

YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



Osam Bin Laden Conspired with Kaled Shied Muhammad to send people into America, learn to fly then take new skills and fly planes into the World Trade Building, the Capital Building and the Pentagon.



Some say he was hired by Saddam Hussein also.

Answer 14

Of course it was a conspiracy. Terrorists conspired to hijack planes and fly them into buildings.

Answer 15

was and still is. questions have never been answered. don't worry about it too much, nobody cares about our fellow 3000 citizens that were killed that day.





still see a lot of people in denial here. told you nobody cares. they are all too comfortable in their matrix.

Answer 16

I strongly doubt it was, but it is very very suspicous that there was no crash debris at the site of flight 93 in pennsalvania.



there is no way a jumbo jet can crash and totally evaporate.



every crash in history has some major plane parts and that is a fact.



the huge hole in the ground is not like a plane crash it looks like a bomb or missle.



but even if it was a conspiridy what can we do about it



sorry for mispelling i am drunk

Answer 17

Well its a fact they found explosives in the dust and all three collapses defy basic physics i.e. all buildings fell in virtual free fall speed in a normal collapse they wouldn't fall anywhere close to free fall speed.

Answer 18

yes. watch loose change on yout tube. :P



who knows if it was. both sides have good arguments but which side is lying?

Answer 19

People who believe in the 9/11 conspiracy are out of touch with reality. They are mentally ill and with low self-esteem. Conspiracy theories fill them with a sense of self-importance. They are delusions of grandeur -- they believe they are privy to vitally important info that most people don't have. In reality, 9/11 "truthers" are sad, lonely, and mentally ill people.

Answer 20

no. 2 points!!



think about this for a second...the conspiracy theory is that jews were the reason for 9/11 just to start a war with islam over oil.





seriously??? the jews make muslims look bad???? Gee, I thought it was the suicide bombers and the long list of TERRORIST ATTACKS FROM MUSLIMS BEFORE 9/11 that made them look like TERRORIST.



The jews don't have to make muslims look bad...the MUSLIMS make muslims look bad. It also doesn't help that "KILL THE INFIDEL" is in the quaran.

Answer 21

Yes. Al Qaeda conspired to fly planes into buildings.

Answer 22

step away from the medicine cabinet and step into reality.



I think someone has watched one to many films from that crack pot Micheal Moore.

Answer 23

No. Who benefits from this? U.S.? Did U.S. benefit anything? No.

Answer 24

There is definitely more and it gets complex. It's probably helpful to look at a few facts. The best place to start would be actual footage of witnesses who were there at the scene when it all happened.



Please watch this first video linked here. It’s only one minute. You’ve read this far into my response so please take just one small minute and watch this first video. You’re going to be impressed. This is a local news video of a witness named Kenny Johannemann testifying to explosions that happened in the basement of one of the WTC towers. While he is testifying you still see both of the twin towers burning behind him in the background. This was live footage and it's only ONE minute long. Go ahead and watch this here:



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yEuzU3LMgCA

(YouTube Key Words: Johannemann suicide)



Those explosions were from charges that were set up to weaken the structure preparatory to pulling the tower. You say, “wait, this doesn’t fit anything I know, maybe there is some other explanation for those explosions in the basement.” True. This is just one piece of evidence, but it’s a piece of evidence that raises a lot of questions. You didn’t see this on TV either. Does that prick your interest?



The government has promoted a “theory” that maybe the fuel from the jet trickled down the elevator shafts into the basement and subsequently exploded. Could this be? Let’s continue and look at other evidence. Barry Jennings was another witness that got stuck in Building Seven during 9/11. Remember, Building Seven was NEVER hit by a jet. In Barry's case an explosion blew out a stair well below him leaving him hanging and stranded for hours until the fire department got him out. Both the twin towers went down during the time he was stranded. Building Seven, a tall building in it’s own right (47 stories tall), came down at around 5:20 (later that day). Fortunately, he was saved. Watch his account here:



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VntHVueucM8

(YouTube Key Words: Barry Jennings dead age – more hits when “dead age” excluded)



Again, the explosions he talked about were from charges that were set up to weaken the structure preparatory to pulling down this building. You say, “Hold On! Building Seven housed the FBI and the CIA offices, so who would have access to set up explosives in there? There has got to be another explanation.” True. This is just one piece of evidence which raises more questions. Again, you didn't see Barry’s testimony on TV.



William Rodriguez, head janitor at the towers, was meeting with some people in basement level #1 (the highest of several basement levels) when an explosion from below pushed everyone upwards, causing ceiling tiles to fall and walls to crack. Just as William started to express to others what he thought that explosion might be, an airplane hit and shook the building from above. His story begins at 9:31 here:



http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4380137365762802294&ei=beHcSfiDF4L8qAPn2eD4DQ&q=William+Rodriguez&hl=en

(Google Video Key Words: William Rodriguez)



Now, let’s look for other different kinds of evidence. Steve Jones, a physicist, obtained WTC dust samples from the collapsed WTC towers from people who lived nearby. He analyzed it and found that the dust contained residues of explosives. Steve Jones first became famous when he became known as the “voice of reason” during the Pons / Fleischman "Cold Fusion" debacle of 1989, if you remember that. For a Nuclear Physicist, like Steve Jones, analyzing dust samples for explosive residues is a relatively simple task. It may be similar to asking a PhD mathematician to do arithmetic. He reported his detailed findings here in Boston:



http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1957490867030316250&ei=JspdSaLNBZa4qAObztThDw&q=steve+jones+boston

(Google Video Key Words: Steve Jones Boston)



In this lecture, you recall, he offered other scientists to take parts of his samples in order to analyze the "red chips" that he had recently discovered. That was December 2007. These specks have now, in fact, been confirmed to be unexploded “nanostructured super-thermite” particles. That confirmation is not just a smoking gun IT IS THE GUN. See the article here:



http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Scientists_find_active_superthermite_in_WTC_0404.html



The actual paper in its entirety can be found here in PDF form. Be sure to click the “download” link here:



http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM



If you get into the actual paper, you learn that the explosives may actually have been sprayed into position like paint or insulation!



Steve Jones’ findings may not fit the stories that you have heard in the news but it does lend support to what Johannemann, Jennings and Rodriguez testified that they saw. You say, “The news media isn’t going to shoot itself in the foot by making something up.” So how do we rectify all the contradictions that we were told in the news? Could Steve Jones and these witnesses be glory-seeking kooks trying to make a name for themselves?



Then take a look at this:



Here is a BBC report announcing the collapse of the Solomon Building (the official name for Building Seven). There is only one problem. The reporter standing at the scene and announcing this didn't realize that, in fact, you could still see Building Seven still standing off to the right. It actually collapsed within about 20 minutes after that live report. Watch it here:



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JlL6ewlW6oc

(YouTube Key Words: BBC Solomon slips – you get more hits by excluding “slips”)



How did the BBC know in advance that Building Seven would collapse? The fact that it was announced in advance is strong support that the flow of information on this tragedy was being controlled.



Were the people at the BBC the only people privy to this information? Probably not. Larry Silverstein was the leaseholder of Building Seven. In a 2002 PBS documentary he talked about how he discussed the Building Seven situation with the fire department and how the decision was made by that department to "pull" it. Well, there is one problem with his testimony that you may want to consider. It takes about a week to rig a building with explosives before you pull it. So are buildings constructed with built-in explosives just in case they need to be blown up in a hurry? Building Seven went down that same day. Whoops! Watch Larry's testimony from the PBS documentary here in this short clip:



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C3E-26oVIIs

(YouTube Key words: PBS Silverstein)



Incidentally, luckily for Larry, he insured his property in the nick of time just six months before September 11th! It was a sweet deal. So who orchestrated this terrorist event anyway? They had to get past the FBI and CIA and prepare at least three buildings for demolition as well as direct the activities of men with box cutters (if they even existed). It’s clear from the evidence presented here so far that at least some of the media was in on this. What else could explain the BBC blunder? They had to control the information to those of us who might not like the idea that a few thousand people had to be killed in order to fulfill some kind of agenda. What’s in it for these people that were “in the know?”



Aaron Russo was a famous movie producer who became best friends with one of the Rockefeller family members (Remember “The Rose” and "Trading Places" starring Eddie Murphy?). This is the same Rockefeller family that is a large shareholder of the Federal Reserve Bank -- a private company that loans money to our government and contributes to our huge national debt. You see the name “Federal Reserve” at the top the dollar bill. Yes, we're talking about THAT Bank! Anyway, the upshot of this friendship was that in the year 2000 (11 months before 9/11) Aaron Russo learned from his Rockefeller buddy that there was going to be an "event". He was told that out of this event the U.S. would go into Afghanistan and look for Bin Laden in Caves and then the U.S. would go into Iraq. His fascinating testimony about this "event" starts at 22:03 here in this interview:



http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5420753830426590918&ei=oMNdSciBKpa4qAObztThDw&q=aaron+jones+cancer&hl=en

(Google Video Key Words: Aaron Jones Cancer)



One more thing. In February 2009 a 44 story Chinese skyscraper caught fire and thoroughly burned into a crinkling cinder. However IT DID NOT COLLAPSE. By comparison WTC Building Seven had a few small fires and was never hit by a plane. It DID COLLAPSE. See that article here:



http://www.infowars.com/fire-consumes-wtc-7-size-skyscraper-building-does-not-collapse

(Google Key Words: China 44 fire consumes)



Amazingly, all this evidence is only the tip of the iceberg. Each of these are separate independent pieces of evidence from unconnected sources. When taken together they paint a clear picture. You are a juror in a court of law. What would be your verdict? Remember, the word “conspiracy” is not in the dictionary to describe a fiction.