I'm a libertarian, not a tea party person but I hope that won't matter to you.
Outsourcing is just a form of free trade. Economics studies of free trade confirm that free trade creates jobs for both trade partners and that the jobs created are generally higher paying than the domestic alternative. This is true EVEN when there is a large disparity in standard of living.
Outsourcing actually PRESERVES US wealth and jobs. Imagine two companies that are identical in every way but one: Company A has outsourced it's tech support to India, and Company B has not. If Company B's tech support is of much higher quality than A, company B will be more productive and will have an advantage in the market. If they do not, the cost savings A acquired by outsourcing will give them an advantage. Thus protectionists claim that A's decision cost American jobs.
But in fact it's not true. Because there is also a company C out there that is FULLY international and is selling it's good in competition with A and B. If C can offer a lower price point and A and B cannot outsource, then A and B will wither and die.
A savvy protectionist might object and say I proved their point, that free trade should be disallowed. But not so fast. Because while protectionism can protect A and B from C, that protectionism will lead to trade retaliation and A and B will have a harder time than C gaining access to emerging markets. Thus C will grow faster. Also, we aren't factoring in the immense cost savings that consumers reap because they have access to C's cheaper goods or A's cheaper goods. This savings is real money in people's wallets that they can spend, invest, save, or whatever. That in turn further charges up the economy.
Protectionists need to understand that TECHNOLOGY has already made borders obsolete. Markets can reach one another cheaply now and laws that slow that down make everyone poorer.